This is a repost from another BADASS blogger, Randi James…important information for anyone in California that has had to deal with a corrupt whore of the court, Janelle Burill. The intent of the blogging is to expose the corruption of family court everywhere. If we need to take down the corruption one official at a time so be it. Family court and it’s whores have underestimated the power of a woman….that was your first mistake among many that are coming…because payback IS a bitch…and a mother too.

Payback is a Bitch

I’d like to dedicate this to that special person that likes to Google their name and then get gag orders placed on bloggers:

The first step in exposing a corrupt MFT or LCSW is usually the filing of a complaint with BBS –

{ To : Enforcement Analyst Board of Behavioral Sciences 1625 North Market Blvd, Suite S200, Sacramento, CA 95834. Tel 916-574-7830 http://www.bbs.ca.gov Ref : Fraud & Misconduct by Janelle Burrill LCS 16216 }

A small percent of valid complaints are investigated by the Boards enforcement analysts and actions taken. Serious misconduct that justifies revocation of license and requires further criminal investigation is sent to the Division of Consumer Affairs, Division of Investigation – They are tasked to conduct a detailed investigation and their findings with details are given back to the BBS for action. BBS sends the findings with evidence to the Attorney General’s office for prosecution along with either interim or permanent suspension orders.

There are many complaints against Burrill. Her perjury, fraudulent practices are exposed with evidence that she or her lawyer husband cannot hide, suppress any more. It is with law enforcement and the people who are supposed to protect consumers have seen and heard it. The complaint against Burrill is being actively investigated by a small team of senior investigators at the Division of Investigators since April 2009. Its been six months and they have uncovered necessary and sufficient evidence and are in the process of sending in their findings. If you are a victim – You can supplement their case and send your complaint with any factual evidence of Burrills fraud directly to the investigators – address below

{To : Senior Investigator, Department of Consumer Affairs

Division of Investigation, 444 North 3rd Street, Suite 201, Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel : 916-324-1497

Ref : Fraud & Misconduct by Janelle Burrill LCS 16216}

Burrill is exposed and her corrupt ways will end soon (Another couple of months). We are optimistic that her ability to harm California families especially children will end. All her prior reports and recommendations to the courts will be thrown out. Prepare yourself – The AG’s report on Burrill is public content and you can call BBS or DCA and get a copy to go back to the courts on any bull shit, fraud she served the courts in her career.

If you are in Sacramento or Placer County then you can send a letter to the District Attorney for their help as-well.

Jan Scully, Sacramento DA, 901 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814

Bradford R Fenocchio, Placer County DA, 10810 Justice Center Drive, Suite #240, Roseville, CA 95678

Be optimistic, don’t give up – Lets get the facts in to the DCA investigators so we can see Burrill in handcuffs for Christmas

victims

JUST SOME OF THE VICTIMS OF BURILL


Let me count the ways…..

It has now come the stand off between my child and the county putting me in jail.

If my crime is protecting my child when she says she’s scared to go to her fathers because he drinks and so does grandma.

When my child told me that she is made to sleep on grandmas living room floor or  if she does not like that, she may chose to sleep in the unfinished basement.

She tells me of both her father and grandmother taking her to the bar, drinking and then when they left the bar, grandma got into the wrong car. There was even a witness, several of them that watched as two drunks left a bar with a worried looking girl.

When the child that wet the bed constantly stopped since she refused to go back to him. The child that tells me she doesn’t believe they will put me in jail, that says she would go instead of me. If I have gotten this far and put in jail by the same county that did nothing to protect my daughter from her drunk driving sexual abusive father in 2006. You know who you are and I know what you are and if you think I have contempt for you, you are correct.

I have NOTHING BUT CONTEMPT, DISDAIN AND DISGUST FOR ALL OF YOU

Hon. Frank M. Calvert, Oconto County Family Court Commissioner

Hon. David G. Miron, Marinette County Circuit Court Judge

Attorney/GAL Aaron Krzewinski, Oconto County

Child Protection Worker, Carrie Silbernagel-Burke Oconto County

Hon. Francis Boyle, Marinette County Family Court Commissioner

Psychologist, Michael Mervilde, Green Bay WI

Counselor, Jennifer Werner, Green Bay WI

prisoner


and my daughter also feels contempt when she grows up and she will thank you for making her who she will become…..your worst nightmare….a child out for revenge for jailing her mother and not protecting either of us when we needed it most. See the wheels of abuse do go round and round. Our bond will never be broken she and I are the same and you can try but you will never succeed.

justice

What minor’s counsel does not want you to hear

http://www.examiner.com/x-14600-LA-Family-Courts-Examiner~y2009m10d20-What-minors-counsel-does-not-want-you-to-hear?cid=exrss-LA-Family-Courts-Examiner

Remember Maija? She is the young girl we heard on YouTube, crying and begging her attorney Ruth Estep, pleading not to be forced to live with her father.

Ms. Estep, appointed by the court, said the judge did not listen to a word she said. But listen to this YouTube video that dramatizes the testimony in court by Ms. Estep after the tearful plea from her client.

I have heard, but not seen any order or transcript, that Tonya Pinkins is required to remove all copies of the tape from the internet. This perplexes me. My understanding is that tapes cannot be used as evidence against a person if made without consent, but the actual taping is not a violation of law. And even if criminal charges cannot be brought against Ms. Estep, shouldn’t the court rethink its appointment of an attorney who does not seem to be representing her client?

dog_kick

 

I don’t understand it….why would my dog hate me? I’m his owner, I give him housing and shelter, he is only here because of me.

I own him, I can do whatever I want to him and he better not hate me for it, I own him.

Why does my dog hate me when I buy him treats but then it is so much fun to tease him by taking them away. Just withholding his milkbone a few extra seconds makes him appreciate me more, I am his owner, I own him.

Why does my dog hate me, he reminds me of his mother… that bitch, I use to kick her around too and then she ran off, I OWNED her. But I still have my little buddy here to keep tormenting….torturing her still…..this dog really hates me…why? Must be his mother that taught him to hate me…what other reason would a dog have to hate it’s owner? He’s my dog to kick…you can’t hate me for that, I own him.

What’s that? You want your Mommy? Sorry….I own you.

 

F**** YOU CPS

F**** YOU CPS

EVEN IF CPS HASN’T PROTECTED YOU DEAR DAUGHTER….THERE IS HOPE

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2130034

B.C. incest victim awarded $600,000 judgment

Keith Fraser, Canwest News Service

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

A 19-year-old Victoria woman who suffered horrific sex assaults at the hands of her father has been awarded nearly $600,000 in damages.

The girl, identified only as C.C.B. in a B.C. Supreme Court ruling, sued her father, identified only as I.B., over sex assaults that occurred while she was between the ages of about five and nine years old.

The crimes were reported to police in 1999 and after a 19-day criminal trial, I.B. was convicted and sentenced to six years in prison. He was released from prison in 2008, but for the civil lawsuit he chose not to appear or be represented by a lawyer.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Victoria Gray concluded that the victim suffers from an anxiety disorder, depression and intrusive thoughts about the abuse, lack of trust in others and low self-esteem and educational underachievement.

The judge said the plaintiff was entitled to a “significant” award of damages because of the severity of the abuse and the many aggravating factors.

“The defendant was the plaintiff’s natural father and sole custodial parent, and in a relationship of trust,” said the judge. “The plaintiff had little support from anyone else, because the defendant kept her from school and insisted that she spend time with him, and as a result the plaintiff was extremely vulnerable.”

The plaintiff was awarded $250,000 for pain and suffering, $300,000 for future earning capacity and $41,800 for cost of future care. Though the defendant did not appear at trial, his father recently passed away and the judge said the inheritance is available to be applied to the judgment.

Canwest News Service

censorship.svg

FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTS ME

Freedom of speech, or the freedom of expression, is recognized in international and regional and human rights law.

Looking at my statcounter I’ve seen the nosy county worker searching and googling for their own name….pathetic if you ask me.

Nonetheless…continue reading my blog you might actually be educated on how CPS workers, Judges, Attorneys and other Whores of the Court place children at risk.

You originally called the mother and child a liar, it was proven they were not and then you did what you do best…NOTHING.

This is what has brought us all here and you should know that my blog is very popular within several organizations that are aware of your actions particularly…don’t tread on me.

Hope you enjoyed your time here :D ….we’ll be watching

Number of Entries:
Entry Page Time:
Visit Length:
Browser
OS
Resolution
56
22nd October 2009 12:08:13
2 hours 4 mins 40 secs
IE 6.0
WinXP
unknown
United States Returning Visits:
Location:
IP Address:
Entry Page:
Exit Page:
Referring URL:
0
Oconto, Wisconsin, United States
Centurytel Internet Holdings (207.230.213.135) [Label IP Address]
mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/the-grudge/
mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/the-grudge/
No referring link

dtom-shirt-for-den-2

Quentin-Tarantino-Talks-Kill-Bill-3

Who am I? I’m a Mother and I’m the most deadliest woman on the face of the earth

After years of abuse, threats, coercion and colluding with my abuser one woman is taking on a county (two actually) who have tried very hard to break her and her child. What they don’t know is that the Mother that they decided to use their underhanded tactics on isn’t from around these parts. She’s a warrior…and just like Beatrix Kiddo in Kill Bill…her enemies made her stronger.

So thank you Oconto County for giving me the strength, courage and tenacity to fight for my child and for what is right. Thank you Marinette County for helping me realize that you will never stop colluding with my abuser and for that I will never shut up, give up or go away. My child also has learned from your tactics and you will NEVER break the bonds between us…you have made us stronger….to face our abuser that you allow to stalk us in family court. The days of the corruption, collusion and cronyism is numbered for your ilk. Soon my daughter WILL be of age and I hope she sues ALL of your asses for failing to protect her when you had the chance….but for now….you should all remember that……

YOU NEVER GET BETWEEN A LIONESS AND HER CUB

Kill-Bill-Vol-2-Uma_l

WHEN WILL THIS STOP?!

ATLANTA — Three people were killed and at least one was injured in Athens, Ga., on Saturday when a University of Georgia professor opened fire at a community theater, police officials said.


George M. Zinkhan III, a professor at the University of Georgia, was being sought by the police.

The police identified the gunman as George M. Zinkhan III, a professor of marketing at the university’s business school. He was at large early Saturday evening.

The coroner for Athens-Clarke County, Sonny Wilson, said the shootings occurred around 12:30 p.m. Police officers responding to a call at the Athens Community Theatre, near downtown, said they had found three adults killed by gunfire. News reports said that one to three other people had been injured.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitutio n identified one victim as Marie E. Bruce, 57, the wife of Mr. Zinkhan and the president of the theater’s board of directors. Beth Kozinsky, the membership director for the theater, told the newspaper that the other victims were Ben Teague, 63, and Tom Tanner, 40, also theater officers.

Athens is 70 miles east of Atlanta.

An alert on the university’s Web site identified Mr. Zinkhan as “a suspect in a shooting off campus” and warned, “Use extreme caution if contact is made.”

Students were informed by a text alert.

“Some people are kind of freaking out,” said Carolyn Crist, a junior and the editor of the campus newspaper. “Some people are honestly nonchalant.”

A biography of Mr. Zinkhan, 47, on the university Web site said he was the co-author of two books, on consumption and electronic commerce, and had served as editor of The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science and of The Journal of Advertising. He received a doctorate from the University of Michigan in 1981 and a bachelor’s degree from Swarthmore College in 1974. He joined the faculty at the University of Georgia in 1994.

Either immediately before or after the shooting, Mr. Zinkhan dropped off his two children at the home of a neighbor. “He indicated that he needed someone to watch his kids for an hour,” the neighbor, Robert Covington, said in a telephone interview. “He said there had been an emergency.”

Mr. Zinkhan’s children are now in the custody of the police, Mr. Covington said.

Another neighbor, Dana Adams, described Mr. Zinkhan as disarmingly quiet. “He was the kind of strange character that did not talk,” she said. “But I never thought he’d do something like this.”

Josh Gurley, 21, a university junior who was in Mr. Zinkhan’s course on consumer buying behavior, said the professor unexpectedly canceled class last week and said students did not need to take the final exam.

UPDATE!

GEORGE ZINKHAN BODY FOUND

Fugitive muder suspect George Martin Zinkhan III dug his own grave and covered himself with debris before firing a single bullet into his head, investigators told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

His well-hidden body was discovered Saturday by cadaver dogs in thick woods about 1,000 yards from an elementary school.

His body was removed a few hours later and sent to the State Crime Lab. Athens-Clarke County police are holding a news conference at this hour.

The dogs found the body about a mile from where Zinkhan’s red Jeep Liberty was recovered more than a week ago in some woods not far from his home in Bogart, in Clarke County.

The body has tentatively been identified as Zinkhan’s until the state medical examiner can make a final identification using dental records.

When Zinkhan’s jeep was found on April 30, police swarmed over the area looking for traces of the fugitive. The body was found outside the original search area, sources said Saturday. According to WAGA-TV, searchers returned to the area with dogs on Friday with no results. They resumed the search Saturday morning.

U.S. Marshals, Athens-Clarke County police and officials from the coroner’s office were on the scene when an AJC reporter arrived at 1:30 p.m. Saturday afternoon. Officials took the body away at 1:45 p.m.

Georgia Bureau of Investigations spokesman John Bankhead said the body had been taken to the crime lab and an autopsy and identification would be completed by the end of the day Saturday.

The playground at Cleveland Road Elementary School was cordoned off as a crime scene. A short distance away, toddlers and their parents were attending a birthday party in the school’s gym.

Aaron Clanton, a teacher at the school, arrived Saturday morning around 10:40 a.m. for his son’s party that was supposed to take place at the school playground. Clanton said police were already on the scene. They told him Zinkhan’s body was found about 1,000 yards behind the playground, in the woods.

Zinkhan, 57,was the subject of a nationwide manhunt since April 25 when three people were shot dead at Athens Community Theatre near the university campus — Zinkhan’s estranged wife, Marie Bruce, and Ben Teague and Tom Tanner.

All three were members of the Town & Gown Players. They were attending a luncheon with a few dozen current and former members that afternoon.

Witnesses said an argument ensued between Bruce and Zinkhan, who left the party. He returned with two handguns and started shooting, hitting Bruce, Tanner and Teague multiple times.

Zinkhan then went back to his car, in which his daughter, 10, and son, 8, were waiting. He drove the children to a neighbor’s house and asked Covington to watch the kids because there was an emergency.

A respected professor of marketing at UGA’s Terry School of Business, Zinkhan eluded authorities for nearly two weeks.

Police believed they caught a break April 30 when they found the Jeep Liberty. But a search by dozens of heavily armed law enforcement officers over more than 300 acres of Clarke and Jackson counties failed to locate Zirkhan.

Last Saturday, authorities staked out Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport in Atlanta. Zirkhan had purchased an airline ticket for a May 2 flight to the Netherlands, where he taught part time at an Amsterdam university and owned a home there. But again, there was no sign of him.

Police later said his passport had been recovered in the Jeep.

Law enforcement authorities intensified their search for leads in the case in recent days, distributing a GBI sketch of Zirkhan clean shaven and without a beard. The Athens-Clarke County Police Department on Thursday offered a $1,000 reward for information leading to his arrest

relieved_woman

REVISIONS:

BILL NUMBER: AB 612	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN SENATE  JUNE 28, 2009
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MAY 5, 2009
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  APRIL 22, 2009

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Beall
   (Coauthors: Assembly Members Ma, Smyth, and Torrico)
   (Coauthor: Senator Yee)

                        FEBRUARY 25, 2009

   An act to add Section 3027.3 to the Family Code, relating to
custody and visitation.

	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

   AB 612, as amended, Beall. Custody and visitation: nonscientific
theories.
   Existing law governs the determination of child custody and
visitation with a child in contested proceedings. Existing law
provides for the use of court-appointed investigators, as defined,
including court-appointed evaluators directed by the court to conduct
a child custody investigation in those proceedings. Existing law
authorizes the court to appoint a child custody evaluator if the
court determines it is in the best interest of the child. If directed
by the court, the evaluator is required to file a written
confidential report on his or her evaluation. The report may be
received in evidence on stipulation of all interested parties and is
competent evidence as to all matters contained in the report.
Existing law requires all child custody evaluators to have completed
specified training relating to domestic violence and child abuse.
Existing law requires the Judicial Council to adopt standards for
court-connected evaluations, investigations, and assessments related
to child custody. Existing law also requires the Judicial Council to
formulate rules of court that establish education, experience, and
training requirements for child custody evaluators and to establish
related forms, as specified.
   This bill would provide that  a child's expression of
significant hostility toward a parent may be admitted as possible
corroborating evidence that the parent has abused the child. The bill
would prohibit a court from concluding that an accusation of child
physical or sexual abuse against a parent is false based solely on
the child's expression of significant hostility toward the parent.
The bill would also require that, on and after January 1, 2010, these
provisions be included in all training required of child custody
evaluators, and would, consequently, require the Judicial Council to
revise training standards for child custody evaluators  
allegations of physical or sexual abuse against a child are to be
investigated using specified methods of data collection and analysis.
The bill would provide that the rules of evidence applicable in
criminal proceedings shall apply whenever the court considers an
allegation of physical or sexual abuse against a child in a custody
proceeding. The bill would also provide that unproven, nonscientific
theories, including, but not limited to, alienation theories, as
specified, are not consistent with generally accepted clinical,
forensic, scientific, diagnostic, or medical standards. The bill
would prohibit a court from relying upon an unproven, unscientific
theory and from accepting into evidence any finding provided by an
expert witness or court appointed professional who has relied on
  an unproven, nonscientific theory that is a basis for that
finding. The bill would require the Judicial Council to provide
training consistent with these provisions  . The bill would
include a statement of legislative intent.
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    It is the intent of the Legislature
that courts strive to protect the safety of children by ensuring that
abuse allegations are investigated appropriately and that protecting
children from physical and sexual abuse is the highest priority in
custody and visitation decisions. 
   SEC. 2.    Section 3027.3 is added to the  
Family Code   , to read:  
   3027.3.  (a) Allegations of physical or sexual abuse against a
child are to be investigated using methods of data collection and
analysis consistent with the requirements of Section 3118, as further
clarified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Rule of Court
5.220, as it read on January 1, 2009.
   (b) The rules of evidence applicable in criminal proceedings shall
apply whenever the court considers an allegation of physical or
sexual abuse against a child in a proceeding pursuant to this
division.
   (c) Unproven, nonscientific theories, including, but not limited
to, alienation theories that assume that a child's report of physical
or sexual abuse by one parent is influenced or fabricated by the
other parent, are not consistent with generally accepted clinical,
forensic, scientific, diagnostic, or medical standards. The court may
not rely upon an unproven, unscientific theory and the court may not
accept into evidence any finding provided by an expert witness or
court appointed professional who has relied on an unproven,
nonscientific theory that is a basis for that finding.
   (d) Nothing in this section shall limit the consideration of
actual evidence, behaviors, statements, or conduct by either parent
or by the child.
   (e) The Judicial Council shall provide training consistent with
this section.  
  SECTION 1.    It is the intent of the Legislature
that courts strive to protect the safety and best interest of
children in custody matters by ensuring that allegations of physical
and sexual abuse are investigated appropriately or referrals are made
to the child welfare services agency.  
  SEC. 2.    Section 3027.3 is added to the Family
Code, to read:
   3027.3.  (a) A child's expression of significant hostility toward
a parent may, in the discretion of the court, be admitted as possible
corroborating evidence that the parent has abused the child. The
court may not conclude that an accusation of child physical or sexual
abuse against a parent is false based solely on the child's
expression of significant hostility toward the parent.
   (b) On and after January 1, 2010, the provisions of this section
shall be included in all training required pursuant to Section
3110.5. 

Assemblymember Beall: Junk Science Should Be Thrown Out of Court

AB 612 Requires Family Courts to Restrict Use of Pseudo Syndromes in Custody Cases

(Sacramento) – Assembly Bill 612,  legislation from Assemblymember Jim Beall, Jr. (D-San Jose), outlawing unscientific “alienation’’ theories that have fueled bitter and expensive child custody battles, cleared its first hurdle on Tuesday when it was approved by the Assembly Committee on Judiciary. Supporting the measure at the hearing was award winning television star Nancy Lee Grahn (General Hospital’s Alexis Davis) and others. nancy

The bill seeks to prohibit courts from considering nonscientific theories when making decisions on child custody or visitation. The American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family “noted the lack of data to support so-called ‘parental alienation syndrome,’ ’’ according to an association statement.

AB 612 would also eliminate training in non-scientific theories, such as parental alienation theories, from Judicial Council-approved education for family court professionals.

“We want to change a harmful family court practice that apparently has gone unchecked for some time, resulting in innocent children being improperly placed,’’ Beall said. “This legislation requires family courts to follow the legal principals of accepted evidence. Pseudo ’syndromes’ should not be allowed as evidence in life-altering custody determinations.

The Parental Alienation Syndrome presupposes that the custodial parent brainwashes the child to make false statements against the other parent. The theory or syndrome has been employed by some abusive parents to regain custody of the victimized child, experts say.

“Too many times, court evaluators are sidetracked by this pseudo syndrome into presuming the child’s hostility toward the non-custodial parent resulted from ‘programming’ by the custodial parent while completely ignoring symptoms of abuse or domestic violence by the non-custodial parent,’’ Beall said.

By prohibiting non-scientific theories, the bill makes evidentiary standards in family court more consistent with other courts.

For additional details on each of the measures please visit the website of Assemblymember Beall: www.asm.ca.gov/beall

Here are links to audio of Assemblymember Beall and Nancy Lee Grahn:

Assemblymember Beall says its time for California to ban the use of the so-called parental alienation syndrome argument.

Assemblymember Beall says use of the parental alienation syndrome argument has resulted in children being abused.

Nancy Lee Grahn, television actress (General Hospital’s Alexis Davis), says AB 612 is desperately needed.

Nancy Lee Grahn says parental alienation syndrome is bogus science.

Friday night and Christy Grice is running from her own home and is shot in the back. This is not some random act of violence this is a growing trend in America where women are not being protected by the courts and the Judges that took an oath.

Violence Against Women Act is useless until Judges and other court officials are trained……we will never stop fighting for Christy, Kelly, Marie and all the other women that have become a statistic….your voices will never be silenced, that is my promise.

christy_phixr

UPDATE: Monday 5/11 @ 10:45am
PORTSMOUTH, Ohio (WSAZ) — Scioto County Sheriff Marty Donini has released more information on the shooting deaths of Christy Grice and her ex-husband, Keith “Butch” White, over the weekend.

The sheriff says the case is being investigated as possible murder-suicide.

Donini says Grice was shot in the back, running away from her home on Filmore Lane in Wheelersburg late Friday night.

The sheriff says White was found dead at his home on Route 140 in Wheelersburg at around 11 a.m. Saturday morning.

Donini says White died of a self-inflicted shotgun blast.

Investigators say the couple had been divorced for about 6-7 months.

Court records show that Christy petitioned for a domestic violence civil protection order against her then-husband back in late 2007. Her attorney says Christy testified that Butch had threatened her life. Butch said he did not. The judge ruled it was a “he said, she said” with not enough evidence and did not grant the order.

Sheriff Donini says domestic violence protection orders do not guarantee safety.

“In this case, with such violence, you don’t know that it would have helped, but you can never tell,” Sheriff Marty Donini said.

Donini also tells WSAZ.com that Grice’s daughter was at an after-prom party when her mother was shot.

Grice worked as a pharmacist at King’s Daughter Medical Center

art.coleman.ktvi

art.wheats.family.w

For some of us, CNN is the official news source, meaning, it ain’t even important, unless we see in on CNN! So many murders, murder-suicides, and familicides have taken place since 2009 began, but few of them have made it to CNN headlines.

Many local news sources have made trivial attempts at explaining the deaths and the perpetrators’ motivations. There have been maybe one or two great articles that do not site the economy exclusively (See 52 Days of Domestic Violence Flu), because it’s not really the economy, but rather the thinking that prevails in a paternalistic society like ours. (See The Murder Suicide Epidemic: Larger Longitude Study Debunks “Mother Killer Myth” and, Family Annihilations, Murder-Suicides: Warning Signs Go Unheeded Because We Normalize Them and, Join Up the Dots)

This front page article on CNN (as of 10pm 5/19), Despondent dads driven to kill loved ones, presents multiple reasons behind why these fathers choose to murder. The economy is cited as a stressor, but at least it doesn’t overpower the fact that murder is still a choice that is being made by those thirsty for power and control. The two reasons cited are “revenge” and “despondency.”

Mental health was also cited as a factor (as usual):

Case Western researchers found that more than three-fourths of the offenders in 30 murder-suicides in the Cleveland, Ohio, area had signs of mental illness. Half of the men had borderline personality disorders, which trigger significant mood upheavals, impulsiveness and feelings of worthlessness.

So, now that this information has been provided, what are we going to do with it?

I’ll warn you, CNN, that you may get some hate mail/emails/phone calls and a nasty campaign from fathers’ rights groups in the near future for posting this article (like Lifetime Network and the DART bus ads). They will say that you are doing fathers a disservice, and that not all men are violent, and that this piece is misandrist, and that you have been infiltrated by the feminazis that also took over the family court…never mind the fact that many women, children and a few innocent men are dead and continue to die almost weekly, never mind that you are not talking about ALL men, never mind that this society spends all of its time talking about this and that bad mother (and when men abuse, women are “failing to protect”), never mind that society remains intent on using the field of psychology to exclusively label and punish women/mothers (the Mother’s Act, Parental Alienation), never mind that those who control the media outlets are men.

And I ask again, now that this information has been provided, what are we going to do with it? More will die next week. More restraining orders will be ignored, more judges will disregard the law, more psychologists will violate ethics…What are we going to do?

I just noticed that CNN’s Father-Killer Timeline, to which I linked above, is utterly inadequate. Please visit Violence Against Women and Children News Central, Intimate and Domestic Violence in the News, Violent Angry Men, and Chaos Theory’s murder-suicide map for more accurate accounts of the 2009 murders.

Also read great comments on Shakesville!:

Also, it’s telling that you don’t see nearly as many mentally ill women killing their spouses for reasons not related to domestic violence. If mental illness were the sole reason men so often kill their wives and children, mentally ill women would be doing it, too. Instead they usually hurt themselves or, sometimes, their children…

pigcop2008

Atlanta officer suspended over comments about mayor

By MARCUS K. GARNER

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Atlanta Police Chief Richard Pennington on Saturday suspended the police union head who said he wanted to beat Mayor Shirley Franklin with a bat.

“The Atlanta Police Department does not condone nor will we tolerate supervisors making irresponsible and inflammatory remarks against the Mayor or any citizen of the City of Atlanta,” Pennington said in a statement released late Saturday night regarding Sgt. Scott Kreher.

Kreher would be relieved of duty and placed on paid administrative leave pending a psychological evaluation, Pennington’s statement said.

Kreher, president of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers — Local 623, on Wednesday told city council members that he wanted to hit the mayor “in the head with a baseball bat.”

Kreher could not be reached Saturday night for comment.

The comment came during a public discussion about seriously injured police officers receiving poor treatment from the city’s workers’ compensation program.

Kreher later apologized for the statement, but Franklin vowed publicly to file federal and state complaints against him.

A statement Saturday from the mayor’s office called Kreher’s comment “reprehensible,” and said she felt threatened.

Franklin declined to comment on the issue of the city’s workers’ compensation plan, however.

sunrise-apr26

Why She Did It

Sunrise commissioner Sheila Alu exposed a judge’s misconduct — at great personal risk.

By Bob Norman

Published on May 26, 2009 at 3:50pm

  • Kyle T. Webster

    Alu: The judge slayer.

    Alu: The judge slayer.

Sheila Alu sometimes feels like a marked woman. The Sunrise commissioner has been called a “rat” on blogs and newspaper websites, has been shunned at her day job as prosecutor in the State Attorney’s Office, has lost friendships, and was personally attacked in a recent deposition.

Her sin: coming forward about gross misconduct on the part of a well-connected local judge.

Alu, a single mom first elected to office in 2001, came forward in New Times last year about Broward Circuit Judge Ana Gardiner’s improper socializing with a prosecutor during a first-degree murder trial. As a result, the Florida Supreme Court overturned the death-penalty conviction of Omar Loureiro last week and ordered a new trial.

Although a number of courthouse insiders laud Alu for speaking out about a courthouse rife with abuse and corruption, she has gained no shortage of enemies for doing the right thing.

And real justice hasn’t come. The erratic Gardiner, whose career has benefited from friendships with State Attorney Michael Satz and disgraced former Broward Sheriff Ken Jenne, has yet to be punished despite the fact that she had improper communication with a prosecutor and clearly violated a defendant’s constitutional rights.

Worse, the judge demonstrably lied in an April 30 deposition in the Loureiro appeal when she denied much of Alu’s story. In that deposition, Gardiner also made unseemly personal allegations against the Sunrise commissioner that Alu says are untrue.

The 46-year-old Alu says she’s not sure if speaking out about Gardiner’s misconduct was worth it. “I’ll think I made the right decision if other people come forward when they see misconduct at the courthouse,” she says. “If they don’t, it wasn’t worth it.”

To understand why Alu came forward against Gardiner, why she put her career as a politician and prosecutor on the line, you have to go back to her childhood in Palm Beach County, where she grew up in an abusive and neglectful household and was put into foster care when she was 11.

She says she suffered terribly in state-supervised care, an experience that later motivated her to want to change the bureaucracy and fight corruption. But before she ever thought about politics, she wanted a family of her own. After a failed first marriage, she and second husband, Joe Alu, a Plantation police officer, had a daughter, Christina, in 1991.

Four years later, Joe Alu was blown up in a house explosion that severely burned him and another officer, Jim O’Hara. Two young girls were killed, as was their estranged and distraught father, who had poured gasoline throughout the house.

While caring for her husband, Alu learned that if he were unable to return to work, the city’s health coverage would run out for the family. Her fight to change that put her in the public eye. “Go to the mayor’s office,” she told the Sun-Sentinel. “Go bang down his door.”

A political career was born. Her effort ended after a triumphant trip to Washington, D.C., where she watched then-President Bill Clinton sign the Alu-O’Hara Public Safety Officer Benefits Act on the lawn of the Rose Garden.

The issue also led Alu to become politically involved at the local level. In 2001, she won election to the Sunrise commission.

During her first term, she met lobbyist Ali Waldman, the girlfriend and lawyer for land baron Ron Bergeron. Waldman was leader of a group of political women who called themselves the Steel Magnolias. Alu joined the club, which also included state Rep. Ellyn Bogdanoff and political operative Mary Fertig.

The women were hyped at one time in the media as corruption fighters, and Alu took the role to heart. “I thought the Magnolias were about ridding Broward of corruption and putting incorruptible people into office,” she says. “I really believed that.”

Alu, who divorced Joe Alu in 2004, and Waldman became close. Alu says she looked up to Waldman, who encouraged her to enroll in law school at Nova Southeastern University. Waldman often brought Alu to Bergeron’s expansive ranch, Green Glades, and the women were seen at dinners and charities all around town.

But Alu knew that Waldman lobbied local governments on behalf of clients, including the superwealthy Bergeron. She says she told Waldman never to lobby her on Sunrise matters or the friendship would have to end.

“We had an explicit oral agreement, ‘You don’t lobby me, we don’t do any business together, we’re just best friends,’ ” says Alu.

There were a few gifts above the $100 limit she was allowed to receive. In 2005, she had Waldman and Bergeron over to her house for dinner. When Bergeron saw that only one burner worked on her stove, he had a new one delivered for $1,200. Alu properly disclosed the gift on state forms.

She didn’t see anything wrong with it because she never used her political office to help Bergeron or Waldman. And neither of them ever asked. Until 2007.

Early that year, Waldman began talking about a plan to build a large housing development on the old Sunrise Country Club site. Alu says Waldman told her that the company proposing it, Miami-based GC Homes, was good and that she was a friend of the owners, Pedro and Michael Garcia-Carillo.

Alu says she began to suspect that Waldman was using her friendship to push the golf course development in her city. She tried to avoid the topic.

Then came the night of March 23, 2007, when Alu met Judge Ana Gardiner at Timpano on Las Olas Boulevard for dinner and drinks.

Alu says that Gardiner called before arriving and said she was with someone she shouldn’t be with. Then the judge showed up with homicide prosecutor Howard Scheinberg and fellow judge Charlie Kaplan.

What happened next is well-known to those who follow Broward news: Gardiner and Scheinberg began laughing about a juror fainting at a murder trial after seeing gruesome photographs of the murder victim. They also laughed about the fact that both the defendant, Omar Loureiro, and the victim were gay.

When Alu realized that Gardiner was the judge in the case and Scheinberg the prosecutor and that the trial was still ongoing, she was stunned. She had just taken the ethics portion of the Florida Bar test the week before and knew this was utterly wrong — even cause for a mistrial.

As Scheinberg rode with her to another bar, Alu says she immediately asked him, with outrage in her voice, how he and Gardiner could talk about an ongoing case. He told her that if she felt it was wrong, she should report it to the bar.

When they arrived at the Blue Martini, Scheinberg was extremely upset by the conversation and left almost immediately. Kaplan and Gardiner left with him.

The next day, Alu sought advice from lawyer Stuart Michelson, husband of County Commissioner Ilene Lieberman.

“He was astonished at what they’d done,” says Alu. “He started spewing off canon violations. I asked him, ‘What should I do about it?’ He said that I wasn’t technically a lawyer yet so I didn’t have a legal obligation to report her to the bar.”

Another friend, property appraiser’s investigator Ron Cacciatore, heard about what had happened from Judge Kaplan, who has since died of a heart attack, and called Alu about it. He says he told her that she shouldn’t repeat what she had heard. “She was agonizing over the behavior of a sitting judge,” says Cacciatore. “I told her to forget about it… sometimes the right thing can cause you more problems.”

Now Alu was at odds with two friends, Waldman and Gardiner, over serious ethical issues. To top it off, the trio of women flew to New York City for a shopping trip the next weekend, in part to celebrate Alu’s graduation from law school.

She says that it was the first real vacation she’d taken in nearly a decade and that she was ready to have a good time. But once they were there shopping on Fifth Avenue, it went downhill fast.

Alu rarely spoke with Gardiner in New York or ever again; their budding friendship was already dead. (In a deposition taken more than a year later, when the Timpano incident was finally investigated, Gardiner denied talking about the case with Scheinberg. In an ad hominem attack, Gardiner also accused Alu of drinking too much and having an affair with the married Cacciatore — an accusation both Cacciatore and Alu strongly deny.)

Alu says that she still wanted to save her friendship with Ali Waldman but that the lobbyist wasn’t making that easy.

“Ali kept talking about developing this golf course,” she says. “It wasn’t like she just brought it up once — she kept going on and on and on about it. I finally said, ‘What is the deal with you and this golf course?’ And she said, ‘This is one of my clients.’ My mouth dropped wide open.”

Alu says she reminded Waldman of the no-lobbying rule. “I told her she wasn’t even registered to lobby and she wasn’t supposed to be lobbying me,” says Alu. “Ali said it was a gray area. I told her there was no gray area and that she could either choose our friendship or her client.”

About a month after returning from New York, Waldman made her decision when she registered as a lobbyist for GC Homes with the City of Sunrise. Alu and Waldman haven’t spoken since — and Alu, after hearing complaints from residents about the golf course, killed the plan before it even had a chance to come up for a vote on the Sunrise commission. Waldman didn’t respond to a call for comment.

Months after the Timpano incident, Alu told me, off the record, what Gardiner had done and said it still bothered her. I told her it was a very important story, but she refused to go on the record, saying that it might not do any good and that it could ruin her career as a lawyer.

In January 2008, Alu was hired as a prosecutor for the State Attorney’s Office. A month later, on Super Bowl Sunday, Judge Gardiner crashed her car on a Fort Lauderdale street while spying on a boyfriend at a party.

Using the bizarre accident as a springboard, I began reporting on allegations of improper relationships with lawyers that have been made against Gardiner over the years. Again, I asked Alu if she would go on the record about what she’d seen. After first refusing, she called and left a message on my answering machine.

“OK, I thought about it. I’m ready to give you my quote and what I want to say about Ana Gardiner, and you can use my name,” she said. “I realize by speaking out to the press about this incident… it could lead some people from the legal community to shun me or potentially blackball me, but I became a lawyer to seek justice… I still believe in a defendant’s right to a fair trial. I feel the public has a right to know.”

Soon we would find out.

With festivities of “Father’s Day” rapidly approaching and knowing that all the “Super Dads” are all getting their superhero costumes cleaned and are preparing to sulk on Father’s Day because they get a bad rap. I must say a special “Thank You” to all the insipid, worthless assholes that think they can do a better job than a mother.

F        is for Family Court, that you’re always in

A        is for Abuse, and all other sins

T        is for Tricks,  dirty ones are all you know

H       is for Hatred, driving you on and on so

E        is for your Ego, when I do see you I want to vomit and scrub my skin

R        is for Resentment, ask your children they’ll clue you in

Put that all together and what does it spell??

Egotistical, controlling, abusive mama’s boy with no backbone.

BTW…You CAN’T milk a FUCKER, FUCKER

dad

Let's Get HonestVAW NewsThe Truth About The Family CourtDenom His Chaos TheoryRights For Mothers NewsOz Pig pageFathers Rights NakedGlenns CultThe Truth About The Family CourtCustodial Justice - A Human Rights IssueRandi JamesBattered Mothers Lose CustodyKansas Family Court Reform CoalitionCold North WindIndiana Mothers For Custodial JusticeMama LibertyVIolent Angry MenMama LibertyEXPOSING THE UNTOLD TRUTHS OF FAMILY LAW WEBGUIDEAnonymums

http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/06/rockefeller_jur_3.html

WONDER WHAT THE MYSTERY IS HERE?

Another day — and no verdict — in ‘Rockefeller’ case

June 11, 2009 04:29 PM

ryan_rockefeller-9_met.jpg
(David L. Ryan/Globe Staff)

Clark Rockefeller on Wednesday in Suffolk Superior Court.

By Maria Cramer and Andrew Ryan, Globe Staff

A Suffolk Superior Court jury has concluded its deliberations for the day in the parental kidnapping trial of the man who calls himself Clark Rockefeller.

ryan_rockefeller-7_met_001.jpg
Judge Frank Gaziano

The jury, which began deliberating after closing arguments Monday and has spent three full days since, was sent home at about 4 p.m. today.

On Wednesday, the jury asked a judge what prosecutors had to prove in the case in which the defendant has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. Judge Frank Gaziano told the jury that prosecutors had to prove that Rockefeller understood the legal and moral consequences when he kidnapped his 7-year-old daughter last summer after a bitter divorce.

“The Commonwealth does have to prove the defendant could appreciate the criminality or legal import and the wrongfulness or moral import of his conduct,” Gaziano told the jurors. “Further, when you asked ‘Or can the Commonwealth meet its burden by proving just one of these?’ The answer to that question is no.”

Rockefeller, 48, has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to the kidnapping charge. He is also accused of giving police a false name and two counts of assault on a social worker supervising the July 27 visit with his daughter in the Back Bay. Prosecutors allege that the defendant is really Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter, a con man who came to the United States as a German exchange student in 1978 and never left.

The question about the legal definition of insanity gets to the crux of the case, which hinges on dueling diagnoses from mental health experts, who gave contradictory testimony.

Public officials call for major changes in family law

By Kamika Dunlap
Posted: 06/11/2009 06:54:02 PM PDT
Updated: 06/11/2009 09:03:13 PM PDT
http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_12573211

OAKLAND — One by one, parents around the Bay Area are beginning to step forward to share heart-wrenching stories of the injustices they experienced in California’s family court system.

These parents have joined with thousands of others statewide to reform the family courts and protect child victims of violence and sexual abuse from judicial decisions the parents say place children in harm’s way.

“I’m living proof this is happening today,” said Susan, a California Family Court litigant and mother whose daughter was placed with her accused molester. “The family courts crisis is a plague and it’s destroying peoples’ lives.”

About 58,000 children per year in the U.S. are ordered into unsupervised contact with physically or sexually abusive parents following divorce, according to experts at the Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence.

Many people concerned about the systemic problems with family court attended a daylong public forum Thursday at the Alameda County Conference Center.

Some compared the family court crisis to the Catholic Church sexual abuse scandals because of what they call an institutional level of collusion of harm against children. Event organizers said they hoped the forum would inspire families who have survived traumatic family court ordeals to come forward in order to shed more light on the breakdown of the family court system.

Participants, including family court litigants,

child advocates and the general public, gathered to discuss the family court crisis and take a closer look at problems and solutions. The forum’s session featured public testimony by speakers and a panel of legal experts and attorneys who gave free general legal advice about how to best protect themselves in the family court.

The event was organized by the Center for Judicial Excellence in partnership with UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law, California Protective Parents Association, Justice for Children, California Safe Child Coalition, Child Abuse Solutions and the Incest Survivors Speakers’ Bureau.

Their collective goal was to push to improve the judiciary’s public accountability and strengthen and maintain the integrity of the courts.

In addition, the center produced a documentary, Family Court Crisis: Our Children at Risk, and screened a 12-minute clip at the forum.

The American Judges Association found that approximately 70 percent of batterers succeed in convincing authorities that the victims of their abuse are unfit or undeserving of sole custody.

Alameda County Supervisor Gail Steele and actress Nancy Lee Grahn from ABC’s “General Hospital” are family court reform advocates and also participated in the panel discussions.

Steele announced a new initiative to help better protect vulnerable children in family court. It includes her support of the passage of new proposed legislation by Assemblyman Jim Beall, D-San Jose, and Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, D-San Francisco, to reform family court. Her initiative also calls for the passage of Sen. Mark Leno’s request for a legislative audit of Marin and Sacramento Family Courts. She also is pushing for ombudsman positions to be created in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office, where parents can go for help and to plead their case.

“The system has to change in California and across the country,” Steele said.

Grahn did not talk in detail about her $1 million family court battle but said her experience was “maddening and perplexing.”

She was upset to learn that some laws were unfair and that some court procedures were abusive and treated children like hostages or assets that need to be divided up.

After a three-year ordeal, Grahn finally gained custody of her 11-year-old daughter. She now works with community organizations and travels the state to meet with lawmakers and inform them about the about pitfalls of the family law system.

“I met people who were in similar or worse situations,” Grahn said. “There are thousands of women who were protective parents and their children were taken away and handed over to their abusers.”

For more information visit, www.centerforjudici alexcellence. org

Reach Kamika Dunlap at 510-208-6448 or e-mail kdunlap@bayareanews group.com.

batman_yellow_belt_tan

Mario Salazar hit his 18-month-old son with a belt buckle, causing bad bleeding that required staples to close the wound. This genius then slapped a police officer who tried to arrest him. But you see, Mario can explain everything. He wasn’t TRYING to hit the child. He was trying to hit HIS WIFE, who was holding the baby and “using him as a human shield” (in Mario’s rather twisted take on things). So it was really HER fault. Thanks for clearing that up for us, Mario. Just like the time my ex husband threw a baby bottle at me while I was holding our youngest daughter. He told the police he “tossed” it at me…it just so happened that my face caught it, luckily.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/140432

An 18-month-old Mesa boy was hospitalized on Wednesday after his father hit him over the head at least twice with a belt buckle while trying to hit his wife, according to a police report.

Mario Salazar, 21, who also is accused of hitting his wife with the belt during an argument, later slapped a police officer in the face when officers attempted to arrest him at his residence in the 1700 block of East Elton on Wednesday, the report states.

Salazar was arrested on suspicion of felony child abuse, aggravated assault on police, resisting arrest and assault, according to the report.

The boy, who was badly bleeding, was taken to a hospital after the argument between Salazar and his wife. The boy had staples placed on his wound and medical staff called the police to report the incident, according to the report.

Salazar also told police, “I didn’t mean to hit him. His mother was using him as a shield.”

Salazar, who also told police he did not intentionally strike the officer, told the police he was an illegal immigrant and that he had been deported once before and returned to the United States after paying a coyote to smuggle him across the border.

ADIOS MUCHACHO

ADIOS MUCHACHO

Pedophiles, abusers and felons getting sole custody,because everyone in Family Court gets a suckle from the teat of the grants. I’ve followed the blood money trail in the name of “Responsible Fatherhood Initiatives”.

Pig_suckling_phixr

Access and Visitation Grants:

Federal Allocation and State Match

Number of parents that received each service type and the number of States that provided these services in FY 2006
State Federal Allocation State Match Total Funding
Alabama $142,610 $15,846 $158,456
Alaska $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Arizona $179,474 $19,942 $199,415
Arkansas $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
California $988,710 $109,857 $1,098,567
Colorado $130,679 $14,520 $145,199
Connecticut $101,505 $11,278 $112,783
Delaware $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
District of Columbia $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Florida $519,757 $57,751 $577,508
Georgia $272,041 $30,227 $302,267
Guam $100,000 $0 $100,000
Hawaii $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Idaho $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Illinois $329,141 $36,571 $365,712
Indiana $164,289 $18,254 $182,544
Iowa $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Kansas $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Kentucky $115,835 $12,871 $128,706
Louisiana $175,073 $19,453 $194,525
Maine $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Maryland $176,152 $19,572 $195,724
Massachusetts $171,937 $19,104 $191,041
Michigan $289,707 $32,190 $321,897
Minnesota $123,675 $13,742 $137,417
Mississippi $113,215 $12,579 $125,795
Missouri $171,130 $19,014 $190,144
Montana $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Nebraska $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Nevada $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
New Hampshire $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
New Jersey $217,628 $24,181 $241,809
New Mexico $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
New York $605,368 $67,263 $672,631
North Carolina $272,566 $30,285 $302,851
North Dakota $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Ohio $334,160 $37,129 $371,288
Oklahoma $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Oregon $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Pennsylvania $341,055 $37,895 $378,950
Puerto Rico $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Rhode Island $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
South Carolina $142,481 $15,831 $158,312
South Dakota $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Tennessee $178,061 $19,785 $197,845
Texas $646,627 $71,847 $718,474
Utah $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Vermont $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Virgin Islands $100,000 $0 $100,000
Virginia $192,500 $21,389 $213,889
Washington $171,388 $19,043 $190,431
West Virginia $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Wisconsin $133,236 $14,804 $148,040
Wyoming $100,000 $11,111 $111,111
Total $10,000,000 $1,088,889 $11,088,888


MIGHTYMOUSE+ILUVYOU4_phixr

“Father Rights” groups are gearing up in trying to get people to believe they are biased against in Family Courts, especially for “Father’s Day”

Their agenda is that they have no agenda…they mold their views to align with their views...or a as a fellow blogger succinctly put it..

Child abuse doesn’t exist, or if it does exist, it’s for the good of the child (discipline you know), but if it’s not proper fatherly disclipline and it’s child abuse, only moms do it. Any questions? (Abandon logic all ye who enter here)”

The year 2009 hasn’t been too good for the Father Righters to get their point across since the countless of murders of children and estranged women.  One hell bent father has written about an Ol’ School deadbeat dad.

In 1927, Samuel W. Reid apparently refused to pay his child support a.k.a. alimony he stated he “would not pay to have HIS child with the evil ex wife”.

Which is how these men operate, the same as they did in the relationship, they are angry. They stalk their ex wives, girlfriends and even us bloggers who are mothers that tell the truth about Family Court. They call us nasty names, leave nasty comments and lie. But at the end of the day I laugh when I think of their little worlds crumbling with each murder, each arrest and each expose….Goodnight boys.

Batman-Robin-Photograph-C11796794-736362_phixr

GO ROUND AND ROUND

ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK

ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK

Domestic Violence experts and advocates all advise women that if you are in an abusive relationship, get out! The other side to that coin is that when you bounce back from an abusive relationship with the intent on making a new life with your children be forewarned, the Family Court system is not your friend.

In some counties the Judges will not even consider any domestic violence evidence. A Judge in Family Court in Australia is quoted as:

“Whether in fact there was on one side allegations of domestic violence and abuse or whether the applicant was in any way involved in extra marital affairs does not in any way concern me.” Judge Bell

This is just one more slap in the face for an abused woman. Family Court cares not for you or your children, they care for money and boy what money they get! (see Father Hood post). Judges give their friends, GAL’s, Psychologists and Attorneys business.

Lesson One

How Guardian Ad Litems work…

An Oconto County WI Family Court Commissioner, Frank Calvert has consistently appointed attorney, Aaron Krzewinski as a GAL in cases that come before him. What does this mean? Well..for starters this means that Mr. Krzewinski will get at least $2500 for his duties. His duties will allegedly include talking to both parties, the children, family members, school officials, you name it. Now depending on who filed first and IF the father wants a substantial change in placement will depend on how Mr. Krzewinski will make his recommendations.

Five out of five parents that had Mr. Krzewinski as their children’s GAL stated that he had little if no contact with the children. In fact one child wished to speak to this GAL and was refused so the 11 yr old took a cab from his home for five minutes with “his” attorney. The child was amidst a custody dispute where the father wished to retain sole custody and move them out of the country. This child expressed to the attorney that he did not want to leave America, neither did his older austistic brother, both wanted to stay with their mother. The recommendations of the GAL was that the children were to move with their father due to the fact that the father was offering to fly the GAL twice a year to the foreign country to “check” on the children. Luckily the attorney for the mother proved to be worth his salt and objected to such a blatant use of bribery and a new level of corruption.

Now back to the GAL and his fees, like I said $2500 is usually the minimum deposit for his “hard” work. Then you’ll get an itemized bill that will have his phone calls, faxes, emails and other various GAL duties that he’s done. But wait, what’s this? He talked to you once and your ex abuser ten times? But I’m not solely picking on Mr. Krzewinski, he’s not the only useless prick out there in Guardian Ad Litem-land. He is among other of corrupt Family Court officials that do not have the best interests of children at heart but rather their bank accounts and wallets instead.

These stories and more is what has made the new breed of women that have rose from the ashes. We are the monsters that you created. We know that they can’t teach you ethics, morals or even to tell the truth in law school but as long as we have freedom of speech, your deceptions will be uncovered.

UPDATE

Pedro Enrique Rosabal,  the poor dear suffered something terrible from those ubiquitous “marital problems”–which naturally justifies why he picked up his kids at school, taunted the mother by calling her on the phone and telling her he was going to kill them, and then doing so. (When will the press finally stop referring to scumbags who torture and kill their families as having “marital problems”? Wrong! Innocent women and children have problems with violent scumbags.)

To ALL people that believe that mothers commit more violence and murder I challenge you to a 30 day countdown. Even though since January of 2009 there have been numerous murders of women and children from their estranged fathers versus mothers……we will start…..NOW.

bigstockphoto_At_Gun_Point_2661874


Father suspected of killing 2 children in Houston

3 hours ago

HOUSTON (AP) — A father was suspected of shooting and killing his two children on Tuesday and then turning the gun on himself in an apparent attempted suicide, police said.

Police had been looking for the 8-year-old girl and her 6-year-old brother after their mother reported to authorities that “her estranged husband had called saying he had picked the kids up from the school and planned to drive them to an unknown location and kill them,” spokesman John Cannon said.

A short time later, officers were called to an apartment complex in southwest Houston after a resident and a maintenance worker became concerned when they saw two children and a man in a car with its engine on.

The children were found shot and pronounced dead on the scene. A .380-caliber pistol was found in the car.

“All evidence indicates the suspect shot the kids while inside the car at the apartment complex parking lot and turned the gun on himself,” Cannon said.

The 33-year-old man was transported in critical condition to Ben Taub General Hospital with a gunshot wound to the head.

Cannon said the names of the children would be released by the Harris County medical examiner’s office. He did not release the father’s identity.

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Related articles

HE DOESN’T HIT HER

HE DOESN’T THREATEN HER

HE DOESN’T PUSH HER

HE DOESN’T HURT HER IN ANY WAY…..BUT IF HE DOES…..YOU BETTER WATCH OUT…BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW….

The news report below is encouraging….the comments that the ignorant made are disgusting, but this is how DV Survivors are treated.

Supreme Court sets new precedents in domestic violence

by Andrew Clevenger

It was big news last week when the state Supreme Court reversed and vacated Tonya Harden’s 2007 murder conviction. Harden, you will recall, killed her husband, Danuel Harden, with a shotgun he had used to beat and threaten her during what Justice Menis Ketchum described as a “night of domestic terror.”

Tonya Harden(That’s Harden’s booking photo, from September 2004, on the right. Her two black eyes are obvious, but the puncture wound to her right forearm, bruising to her chest and arms and her fractured nose aren’t visible.)

By a 4-1 vote, with Chief Justice Brent Benjamin dissenting, the justices ruled that the physical and sexual assaults by Harden’s husband and his threats to kill her and their children informed her state of mind and were relevant to her claim of self-defense.

As Angie Rosser of the West Virginia Coalition Against Domestic Violence and the Associated Press’ Tim Huber have pointed out here and here, the 44-page opinion sets some new precedents in West Virginia law. It’s a pretty big deal when the Supreme Court issues new precedent, so the new syllabus points are worth repeating here:

–Where a defendant has asserted a plea of self-defense, evidence showing that the decedent had previously abused or threatened the life of the defendant is relevant evidence of the defendant’s state of mind at the time deadly force was used. In determining whether the circumstances formed a reasonable basis for the defendant to believe that he or she was at imminent risk of serious bodily injury or death at the hands of the decedent, the inquiry is two-fold. First, the defendant’s belief must be subjectively reasonable, which is to say that the defendant actually believed, based upon all the circumstances perceived by him or her at the time deadly force was used, that such force was necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury. Second, the defendant’s belief must be objectively reasonable when considering all of the circumstances surrounding the defendant’s use of deadly force, which is to say that another person, similarly situated, could have reasonably formed the same belief. Our holding in Syllabus Point 6 of State v. McMillion, 104 W.Va. 1, 138 S.E. 732 (1927), is expressly overruled.

–Where it is determined that the defendant’s actions were not reasonably made in self-defense, evidence that the decedent had abused or threatened the life of the defendant is nonetheless relevant and may negate or tend to negate a necessary element of the offense(s) charged, such as malice or intent.

–An occupant who is, without provocation, attacked in his or her home, dwelling or place of temporary abode, by a co-occupant who also has a lawful right to be upon the premises, may invoke the law of self-defense and in such circumstances use deadly force, without retreating, where the occupant reasonably believes, and does believe, that he or she is at imminent risk of death or serious bodily injury. In determining whether the circumstances formed a reasonable basis for the occupant to believe that he or she was at imminent risk of death or serious bodily injury at the hands of the co-occupant, the inquiry is two-fold. First, the occupant’s belief must be subjectively reasonable, which is to say that the occupant actually believed, based upon all the circumstances perceived by him or her at the time deadly force was used, that such force was necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury. Second, the occupant’s belief must be objectively reasonable when considering all of the circumstances surrounding the occupant’s use of deadly force, which is to say that another person, similarly situated, could have reasonably formed the same belief. Our decision in Syllabus Point 2, State v. Crawford, 66 W.Va. 114, 66 S.E. 110 (1909), is expressly overruled.

11 comments

1 Courtney { 06.17.09 at 10:15 am }

Do you know what the opinion says? It says that this woman was justified in killing her husband in cold blood. That’s what it says. The DV advocates are rejoicing but if the genders had been reversed, they’d be singing a different tune. What this opinion does is give abused women an exception to the murder statute. They can lay in wait and kill their abusers. But if a man ever advances this defense, I have a feeling the outcome will be different. The cour has basically crafted an exception to the murder statute with this opinion, for abused women. But according to the language of the opinion, anyone in a situation where they felt they were in danger could put on this defense. However, the DV advocates consider it a victory for abused women. Now what’s wrong with this picture?

2 Courtney { 06.17.09 at 10:17 am }

P.S. – for anyone who feels threatened in their own home, I meant.

3 Expatriate { 06.17.09 at 10:36 am }

Courtney, clearly you know nothing about the psychology associated with being a battered woman or have been battered yourself, or you would not make such ignorant statements. And what I find most intriguing is that this sort of comment would come from a woman. How progressive of you! I have said for years that we women are our own worst enemies. Your comments are proof of that assertion.

4 Courtney { 06.17.09 at 10:53 am }

Expatriate, I live with it for the five years of my marriage and for five more after that. And typical of women, you attack me personally for not agreeing with you. I too was trapped and it took me five long years to extract myself. And I can tell you that if there had been a gun in that house, one of us would be dead today. I thought myself about waiting until he passed out and killing him with a baseball bat, but I was afraid I’d just make him mad.

You have a lot of nerve to attack me because I am objective aboout this opinion. You think DV victims deserve an exception to the murder statute and the court agrees with you. So you are in the catbird seat. I disagree and you call me backward, ignorant and undermining. YOU girl are Exhibit A of what’s wrong with women.

Because I lived with a mentally ill (he was committed shortly after our divorce and has been in and out of mental insitutions since) violent drunk and because I worked myself free and am no living well, I might be actually harder on these women because I know it can be done. I also know that I wouldn’t kill the SOB because he was my children’s father (odly he was a very good and kindly father) and they would be left to the system if I were in prison. So I did what was best for them. I finished school, I left, I married well and was able to give them a good life.

(edited to remove objectionable language, personal attack)

5 Courtney { 06.17.09 at 10:58 am }

P.S.

A defenseless man was shot and killed in his hospital bed by his estranged wife. Where are you rightous types and your candle light vigils? Maybe his wife will invoke this opinion by saying she was emotionally battered and had been threatened, and felt he would kill her.

Under the language of this opinion, she can advance self defense theory at trial.

The court regularly carves out exceptions to the law to benefit particular litigants. But with this case, they set new precedent. They said that with a “reasonable” fear, a victim of domestic violence could kill her spouse in cold blood.

Now you, are a little hypocrit. This opinion advocates vigilante justice and murder. Isn’t that what you’re against?

Those close to the investigation know a lot you don’t know, things that couldn’t come into trial and therefore, not in the appeal record. You dear, are the ignorant one.

6 Nature Boy { 06.17.09 at 11:19 am }

Courtney, you are entitled to your opinion and I will not call you names for it. I do disagree with you. If you read Angie Rosser’s Op-Ed linked in at the beginning of this blog or you can cut and paste to your browser from here http://www.wvgazett e.com/Opinion/ OpEdCommentaries /200906120470 this is an important decision for victims of domestic violence. You explained that you were able to escape your circumstances of abuse and better your life, and for that you are both lucky and to be congratulated. But what of the next woman? The women like Harden? I do not understand domestic violence, and cannot for the life of me understand how a man could do what this man did to Mrs. Harden and their children. What I do know is that if someone were treating me like that or threatening my kids like that, I would hope that the law protected me and my right to protect my kids and myself. From reading the news and op-ed articles and the court decision about Mrs. Harden, it sounds like the law almost failed to protect her, because I do not see what she did as deserving prison time.

7 Courtney { 06.17.09 at 11:48 am }

Nature Boy, Expatriate could learn a few lessons from you.

I will tell you why I’m disturbed by this opinion and the response of the DV advocates to it.

First of all, I believe the law is the law and as much as some people would like to, it shouldn’t be bent or distorted to accomodate sympathetic litigants.

Before this decision, the bar was fairly high for proving self defense. That is because you can’t have people going around and killing each other then screaming self defense. It’s not the Old West. Before Harden, a person had to be in imminent danger. That meant someone was actively trying to kill them and they defendend themselves.

In Harden, this woman waited until her husband was passed out drunk on the couch (the court glossed over this but it was established by investigators) then took a shotgun, put it behind his head and shot him, literally spraying the area with brain matter and moving his eyeball to his cheekbone.

The court has now removed the immenent danger element of self defense and replaced it with the subjectively reasonable standard. That means what is fear of death depends is fact based and in consideration of what a person PERCIEVES as the threat of death or bodily injury. They further carved out this murder exception for people who are co-habitating.

To people like Expatriate, violence is okay when someone has it coming as in Harden. That’s what the opinion really says if you read between the lines. These DV advocates claim to be against violence yet they are advocating violence by saying this opinion is a victory for battered women.

This opinion nor DV experts contemplate personal responsibility excpet to eliminate the duty to retreat, and as a former DV victim, I can tell you that simply being a victim should not exempt the victim from accountability.

When I was living the nightmare of domestic violence, my chief concern was my children. I did not want them growing up in such an environment. They kept me from killing their father. I also did not want to face them and explain why I murdered their dad and why they would be growing up with a dead father and imprisoned mother. So I was motivated to do the right thing by them.

Now I’m free. I raised them in a good environement and educated them both. They had trips and good clothes and a nice house and cars on their sixteenth birthdays (I actually overcompensated I think) none of which they would have had if I’d been in prison. But if this opinion had been out and I knew about it and I had in fact kept a gun, things might have been different.

We shall agree to disagree. Then see how this opinion plays out in the court system if a man tries to raise it as a defense.

8 Courtney { 06.17.09 at 12:13 pm }

Another P.S. I’ve had a down morning but that’s over so I won’t be able to follow up to the attacks from people like Expatriate who think that because they are righteous in their beliefs they can personally attack those who don’t agree with them.

The Harden opinion removed very important deterrent elements from domestic violence situations. Rather than promoting women to flee a home of violence and take some sort of responsibility for a potentially deadly situation, it tells them they can skip divorce court and go straight for the shotgun.

That’s a fact and the DV advocates need to own up to the subtlties and implications of this decisions. If the goal is to get women out of abusive sitations then this opinion is a set back.

Last week a woman, estranged from her husband, shot and killed him while he lay helpless in the ICU of the hospital. Clearly that man had a reason to fear for his life. Under Harden, he could have killed the wife before she killed him – that what Harden says, “wait ’till he’s asleep and kill him before he kills you.”

But then you can imagine how that would have gone over with the myopic jerk knee advocates.

In the past two weeks, two men in Charleson have been killed by wives or estranged wives. Watching how their deaths have played out in the media is a prime example of why the system is flawed. As an objective person who believes in seeing both sides of every story, I find it disturbing. But by doing so, I am an enemy of women according to people like Expatriate.

I’ve said my piece.

9 Previously Bruised & Battered { 06.17.09 at 1:03 pm }

I for one am just as excited about this change in precedent as the DV Advocates. The law has not exactly stood behind victims of domestic violence, on the contrary, a lot of times, it forces them to be in the situation.

I have personally experienced this…. 5 years ago, as I stood, crying, beaten, bloody and bruised from face to feet, I had a police officer tell me that my beating (with my baby in my arms) was MY FAULT, because I let my abuser come home. It did not matter that after he left, and I changed the locks so he could not come back, that same police department told me I HAD to let him come home, because his name was on the lease too. I was also told I could not have him removed from the lease without his permission. This same police officer threatened to arrest me if I decided to file charges against my abuser, because I defended myself, and he had a BITE MARK. I did not file charges because I had children that needed me to be at home with them. I did file for an order of protection, and was granted one, but only after my abuser was given the right to stay in our apartment, and myself and our children were forced to leave (I was from here, he was not, so the judge determined that I could stay with relatives) with only a few personal belongings that my abuser chose to let me take (while a police officer watched).

To make a VERY long story short… I can understand why women choose to kill their abusers… why not kill them instead of continue to be abused by them, or you can try to take the legal route and be abused all over again. I somehow managed to get back on my feet and me and my children now have a good life… Do I wish that I would have killed him… yes, sometimes I think it would have been easier than dealing with the 2 years of legal hell I had to endure trying to fight (in court) the man who tried to kill me in front of my children.

Am I saying this is always the case? No. But it happens. Courtney, you call victims of domestic violence sympathetic litigants… I see them for what they are…. VICTIMS. It does not matter their gender, if someone is abused, beaten or killed by their significant other, they are a victim. I am happy that you made it out of your situation… you were fortunate. Perhaps you should attend one of the candlelight vigils (there are plenty) that are held all over the US in October as a remembrance to those who have lost their lives to domestic violence (my great-grandmother was one)…. it may change your perspective.

10 J { 06.17.09 at 1:37 pm }

Really, cut the BS. The woman could have left while he was passed out. Instead, she chose to get a gun and shoot him while he couldn’t defend himself. To say that she’s justified is to condone vigilante justice.

DV advocates ignore the fact that it’s not always one sided. Rather than empowering women, teaching them that they’re equals with men, and promoting non-violence, these organizations have devolved in to the most base of gender-hate clubs, and now it’s apparent that they cheer outright murder.

11 Dawn Miller { 06.17.09 at 2:08 pm }

Thanks, all, for commenting. Just a reminder of the rules:
Disagree all you want, but no personal attacks, please. Thanks to Nature Boy for pulling the discussion back on topic.

Good thing Obama Sr. didn’t want custody of his son…Obama Jr. might not have turned out as good as he did with the help of being raised by a SINGLE MOTHER?!

Obama Fatherfood

Barack Obama got a basketball, his first name and ambition from his father. Little else.

The son gave back more than he received: a lifetime of ruminations about the man who abandoned the family, a memoir named “Dreams from My Father,” and endless reflections on his own successes and shortcomings as a parent of Sasha, 8, and Malia, 10.

As a candidate and now president, he’s been telling men what sort of father they should be. It’s become his Father’s Day ritual.

He’s asking American men to be better fathers than his own.

The president showcased fatherhood in a series of events and a magazine article in advance of Father’s Day this Sunday. He said he came to understand the importance of fatherhood from its absence in his childhood homes — just as an estimated 24 million Americans today are growing up without a dad.

Fathers run deep in the political culture as they do everywhere else, for better and worse. Michelle Obama has said many times how her late dad, Fraser, is her reference point and rock — she checks in with him, in her mind, routinely, and at important moments.

Obama’s presidential rival, John McCain, called his own memoirs “Faith of My Fathers,” tracing generations of high-achieving scamps. The father-son presidencies of the George Bushes were bookends on Bill Clinton, whose father drowned in a ditch before the future president was born and whose stepfather was an abusive alcoholic nicknamed Dude.

A Kenyan goatherder-turned-intellectual who clawed his way to scholarships and Harvard, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. left a family behind to get his schooling in the United States. He started another family here, then left his second wife and 2-year-old Barack Jr. to return to Africa with another woman.

His promise flamed out in Africa after stints working for an oil company and the government; he fell into drink and died in a car crash when his son was 21, a student at Columbia University.

“I don’t want to be the kind of father I had,” the president is quoted as telling a friend in a new book about him.

And in an interview Friday with CBS News, Obama said: “It was only later in life that I found out that he actually led a very tragic life. And in that sense, it was the myth that I was chasing as opposed to knowing who he really was.”

His half-sister, Maya, called his memoirs “part of the process of excavating his father.”

Obama now cajoles men to be better fathers — not the kind who must be unearthed in the soul.

His finger-wagging is most pointed when addressing other black men, reflecting years of worry about the fabric of black families and single mothers, but it applies to everyone.

Father’s Day 2007: “Let’s admit to ourselves that there are a lot of men out there that need to stop acting like boys; who need to realize that responsibility does not end at conception; who need to know that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child but the courage to raise a child.”

Father’s Day 2008: “Any fool can have a child. That doesn’t make you a father. It’s the courage to raise a child that makes you a father.”

Father’s Day 2009: “We need to step out of our own heads and tune in. We need to turn off the television and start talking with our kids, and listening to them, and understanding what’s going on in their lives.”

He doesn’t hold himself out as the ideal dad. No driven politician can.

“I know I have been an imperfect father,” he writes in Sunday’s Parade magazine. “I know I have made mistakes. I have lost count of all the times, over the years, when the demands of work have taken me from the duties of fatherhood.”

He volunteered for those demands, as all people do when they want power. His years as a community organizer, Illinois lawmaker, U.S. senator and presidential candidate often kept him apart from family.

At the same time, he went to great lengths in the 2008 campaign to find time with his girls and wife, and now considers the routine family time one of the joys of living and working in the White House.

The new book “Renegade” by Richard Wolffe recounts strains in the marriage early this decade, arising from his absences and from what Michelle Obama apparently considered his selfish careerism at the time. The author interviewed the Obamas, friends and associates.

Obama himself attributed his “fierce ambitions” to his dad while crediting his mother — a loving but frequently absent figure — with giving him the means to pursue them.

“Someone once said that every man is trying to either live up to his father’s expectations or make up for his father’s mistakes,” he once wrote, “and I suppose that may explain my particular malady as well as anything else.” By malady, he meant the will to achieve.

Obama was a schoolboy in Hawaii when his father came back to visit. He gave his dad a tie. His father gave him a basketball and African figurines and came to his class to speak about Kenya. He was an impressive, mysterious figure whom Obama found compelling, volatile and vaguely threatening.

The visit took a sour turn when Obama went to watch “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” and his father made him shut off the TV, saying he watched too much. Obama slammed the bedroom door; a loud argument ensued among grown-ups.

Not the quality time Obama has in mind in asking dads to turn off the TV now.

Do Lawyers, Judges, GAL’s or any other court appointed court whore think they really have no repercussion to their crimes? Apparently they thought that ALL the children they failed to protect and represent would never remember or ever grow up. Guess you thought wrong. So now all the children that are coming of age and whose lives are irretrievably changed forever…NOW they all will have their reckoning….and THIS is just the beginning. Sorry you didn’t steal all our laughter.

Laughing_Child laughingchild-laughing

Marin Teen Files State Bar Complaint Against Court Appointed Lawyer

Misconduct Allegations Against Sandra Acevedo include Fraud, Perjury and Conspiring to Cover Up Child Abuser, Neglect and Endangerment

In what may be the first case of its kind, 18-year-old college honor student, Alanna Krause, formerly of San Geronimo, has filed a complaint with the California State Bar against attorney Sandra M. Acevedo, the lawyer appointed by then Marin Family Court Commissioner, Sylvia Shapiro-Pritchard, to represent her best interests during her parents’ divorce.

The complaint against Ms. Acevedo (State Bar # 129188), the court appointed attorney for the Minor Child in 1993-1994 in Marin County Superior Court case FL 4889, alleges that Ms. Sandra M. Acevedo conspired with Alanna’s father, Marshall Krause, his girlfriend, Lana Clark, LCSW, and others to:

1)     commit fraud and illegally obtain money

2)     delay, hinder and prevent evidence, testimony and prosecution

3)     commit and suborn perjury

4)   commit child abuse, neglect and endangerment

In 1994, Ms. Acevedo was appointed by Commissioner Sylvia K. Shapiro-Pritchard to represent Alanna’s “best interests” in Marin County California Superior Court case FL 4889 – the divorce/custody case of her parents, Marshall W. Krause v. Lauren Krause.   Instead of representing her best interests, Alanna alleges that Ms. Acevedo knowingly and willfully colluded with her father, a nationally renowned attorney and past president of the Marin Bar Association, and his girlfriend, Lana Clark, to cover up Mr. Krause’s child abuse of her.

Throughout Family Court FL 4889 proceedings, Alanna, who has spoken nationally to conventions and conferences on the issue of Child Abuse, repeatedly told Ms. Acevedo about her father’s abuse and mistreatment of her and asked Ms. Acevedo directly to make these facts known to the court.

Records submitted to the State Bar show that Ms. Acevedo had extensive contact with Alanna teachers and doctors and attended Alanna’s meetings with Child Protective Services. Though Alanna told her teachers and CPS about her father’s abuse, apparently Ms. Acevedo misled them into believing that Alanna’s abuse was being handled by the court, when, in fact, Alanna alleges that Acevedo acted to keep the truth and the issue out of court.

Alanna claims that Ms. Acevedo threatened her mother and her when they tried to bring the truth to the court’s attention themselves. Acevedo supposedly repeatedly attempted to convince Alanna to stop trying to communicate these important facts about her father to the court. Alanna claims that Acevedo ignored medical records of Alanna’s injuries and  perjured herself in declarations to the court.

Furthermore, Alanna alleges that Ms. Acevedo maintained intimate constant contact with her father’s girlfriend, Lana Clark, and intruded Clark’s fabrications and false opinions into the case, which heralded Mr. Krause, blamed Alanna’s mother, and undermined and destroyed Alanna’s credibility, despite the fact that she was a child with no motive other than her own safety. (Services for which Clark received approx. $15,000).

Ms. Acevedo billed nearly $17,000 for her services. Though the court clearly stated it did not have jurisdiction to legally assign Alanna’s mother’s family support to legal fees, Ms. Acevedo took payment from her mother’s family support anyway.

If Ms. Acevedo had done her job, Alanna alleges, the abuse would have been investigated, facts would have been brought into evidence, court rulings might have accorded with evidence, justice might have been done and she might not have had to endure years of her father’s abuse in his full custody. Because Ms. Acevedo willfully did not act in her best interests, Alanna claims to have  suffered years of abuse, neglect and endangerment.

In September, 1997, at the age of thirteen, Alanna ran away from her father and Marin to Los Angeles where she sought and obtained protection, adequate legal representation and justice in Los Angeles Juvenile Court. In the hand of a capable attorney, the court was made aware of the abuse from the first hearing and chose to protect her from her father, in contrast to the results of Acevedo’s representation.

After several months of investigation, on January 12, 1998, the LA Department of Child and Family Services Investigation Report was adopted by Los Angeles Juvenile Court. On this day her father, Marshall Krause pled “No Contest” to WIC Section 300; subdivisions a) & b). The charges that he was a current and future danger to Alanna were sustained. Alanna was then made a Ward of the Court. Her Juvenile Court case stayed open for almost 18 months to protect her from the actions of the Marin Court and it’s appointees for as long as possible. In August 1999 she was placed in my mother’s full custody, where she always wanted to be.

Her attached editorial, “Letting Children Speak For themselves- Youth in Court Need Attorneys Who Represent their Interests Fairly, Strongly” published statewide in the Daily Journal in July, 2000, describes Ms. Acevedo’s failure to represent her best interests and the effect that failure had on events. Click.

Alanna sent numerous documents and supporting evidence of Ms. Acevedo’s alleged professional misconduct. She asked that the  complaint should be cross referenced with the current State Bar investigation of her father, Marshall W. Krause, Esq. in State Bar case # 98-0-01507, which is being handled by Mr. Jeff Dal-Cerro, Assistant to the Chief Trial Counsel, and Ms. Lisa Edwards, CA State Bar Investigator. Click.

Alanna believes there is sufficient clear and convincing evidence for State Bar disciplinary action against Ms. Acevedo.  Among the documentation submitted to the State Bar are copies of KCAL TV’s three part investigation Crimes of Custody which aired in LA in November 2000 which features Alanna and her mother; Alanna’s  editorial, “Letting Children Speak for Themselves-Youth in Court Need Attorneys Who Represent Their Interests Fairly, Strongly, published in the SF and LA Daily Journal in July 2000; Pertinent sections of  Findings on Judge Michael Dufficy, Commissioner Sylvia Shapiro & Court Appointees in Marin County’s Superior Court in California” by Karin Winner, published by The Justice Seekers, Inc. in February 2000; LA Children’s Social Worker’s Judicial Review Report and LA Juvenile Court rulings; A complete history of the several Krause v. Krause cases in Marin, Ventura and LA County courts with “Attachments” of supporting evidentiary documents as well as Ms. Acevedo’s itemized bills revealing the extent of her involvement and influence in Alanna’s case.


Father’s Day Horror: Man Kills Himself and Daughter in Apparent Murder Suicide

By Ray Stern in Crime Blotter, News
Monday, Jun. 22 2009 @ 4:02PM

It’s been a particularly bloody few days for Valley children. Loggan Lampert, 14, is bludgeoned to death by his uncle. A 2-year-old beaten with a belt buckle, allegedly by her mom’s boyfriend, dies. Another 2-year-old dies after being hit by a car in his trailer park. And now this:

A Valley father who went camping with his 3-year-old daughter in a remote area near the Grand Canyon apparently shot himself and the girl.

Family members were unable to make contact with Ryan Peters, 29, and began call police frantically, worried that Peters was suicidal after his recent divorce and loss of child custody to his ex-wife. A relative made mobile-phone contact with Peters, who said he was camping between Jacob Lake and the Canyon’s North Rim. A Coconino County deputy found the bodies early this morning.

child abuse cropped.jpg

See full text of news release by the Mesa police below:

Coconino County Sheriff’s Detectives Investigate the Deaths of a Father and his Daughter at Jacob Lake

Flagstaff, AZ- Coconino County Sheriff’s Deputies are investigating the death of 29 year-old Ryan Peters and his three year old daughter Teigan Peters, both from the Phoenix area. On June 22, 2009 at about 12:25 a.m. the deputy assigned to the Fredonia district located a campsite in the area of Parissawampitts Point off of Highway 67 that leads to the North Rim of the Grand Canyon. He observed the bodies of an adult male and a very young female, both with apparent gunshot wounds.

On Sunday June 21, 2009 at about 9:p.m. officers of the Mesa Police Department called the Coconino County Sheriff’s Office with an attempt to locate on Ryan Peters and his daughter. The Mesa Police Department was contacted by a relative of Ryan Peters who described him as despondent and possibly suicidal as the result of a recent divorce and the determination of the custody of his daughter.

Mr. Peters’ family members contacted the Mesa Police department on Sunday at about 5:30 p.m. with concern for the safety of Mr. Peters and his daughter Teigan. At the time of the initial report it was only known that he was camping however the location was unknown. During the course of the afternoon several family members were in cell phone contact with Mr. Peters and shared that information with the Mesa Police Department.

During their investigation Mesa Police Officers and Detectives learned that Ryan Peters’ ex-wife filed a custodial interference complaint with the Gilbert Police Department on June 19, 2009 when Mr. Peters failed to return Teigan to her mother as stipulated by a custody agreement.

At about 9:p.m. on Sunday a family member told Mesa Police Officers he had talked with Ryan and confirmed he was camping in an area between Jacob Lake and the North Rim of the Grand Canyon.

Coconino County Sheriff’s Detectives will continue the investigation of this apparent murder-suicide in an attempt to determine the events that lead to the deaths of Ryan and Teigan Peters.

Brenda says:This is my grandneice. She is an angel and her father the devil.

Posted On: Monday, Jun. 22 2009 @ 6:50PM

chad says:I know teigans mom and had the pleasure to work with her for a year or so. I am so sorry for your loss. I am so sorry this happend to you T. Please know that my thoughts and prayers are with you right now. I just dont understand, no matter how messed up you are why this precious little girl? such a selfish act.

Posted On: Monday, Jun. 22 2009 @ 7:17PM

Terrence says:I read throughout the article and I dont think to anything else in this article.I agree with you. Nice comment as well as nice article.
Terrence
workouts

Posted On: Monday, Jun. 22 2009 @ 10:16PM

Suzanne Reynolds says:I met Teigan brefly at a Family Easter gathering…my first response to her as a mother to her mother was…she is so adorable!! Teigan was loved by my nephew who is currently in a relationship with her mom and all though I didn’t know her well my heart goes out to her and her family. ~Auntie SR

Posted On: Monday, Jun. 22 2009 @ 10:17PM

Uncle Tony says:Angel Teigan, make room in heaven for the rest of us who had the honor to be introduced to you. And “T”, Uncle “T” is telling you that beautiful and precious little “T” will be welcoming us into God’s Kingdom in exactly 688 days from today (6-23-2009)and I would not dare give someone false hope at such a time as this !

So don’t despair dear mamma, and get yourself ready to be acceptable before the Lord by picking up that Gospel of Grace and it is where your comfort lies at this time; for there isn’t anything more that the rest of us could say to you that could get you closer and quicker to your baby right now than this.

Begin with the Psalms and then check out Amos 3:7 & Matthew 24…
By so doing, God will be gently taking you by the hand and towards your precious little girl who will run to greet you again !!!

The hope of the God’s eternal LOVE that awaits us is what will keep you strong right now; and don’t let ANYTHING stand in the way of that, YOU HEAR ME ???

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 12:48AM

Uncle Tony says:Angel Teigan, make room in heaven for the rest of us who had the honor to be introduced to you. And “T”, Uncle “T” is telling you that beautiful and precious little “T” will be welcoming us into God’s Kingdom in exactly 688 days from today (6-23-2009)and I would not dare give someone false hope at such a time as this !

So don’t despair dear mamma, and get yourself ready to be acceptable before the Lord by picking up that Gospel of Grace and it is where your comfort lies at this time; for there isn’t anything more that the rest of us could say to you that could get you closer and quicker to your baby right now than this.

Begin with the Psalms and then check out Amos 3:7 & Matthew 24…
By so doing, God will be gently taking you by the hand and towards your precious little girl who will run to greet you again !!!

The hope of the God’s eternal LOVE that awaits us is what will keep you strong right now; and don’t let ANYTHING stand in the way of that, YOU HEAR ME ???

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 12:50AM

Crystal says:I don’t think that anyone has the correct thing to say in this situation,You just simply exist and thats all you can do at this point. I grew up with this family and I too have a daughter the same age and being a close member of the family and hearing the cries of a mother wanting her baby is the single worst sound in the world and I looked at the strongest women, mother,girlfreind,daughter ect that I have ever seen. The strength that she posessed was beyong explanation. I love you all so much more than you will ever know and Leah, If you ever get a chance to read this…It’s you and me, thick or thin no matter the odds no matter the hurt, we get through it togather, always have…always will, you are my sister and I love you very much!

~I know your in heaven you beautiful little angel!Make sure to hold your mamma tight and lay with her as she knows your right there with her!

-Crystal and Hayle

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 1:14PM

Heather Selby says:My heart breaks for Ryan and Teigan’s family’s. This is a horrible situation. Ryan is not a horrible person he did a horrible thing. He loved that little girl so very very much!! Seems like now almost to much. He was so afraid of losing her. I remember the 1st time I meet Teigan she kept yelling daddy daddy fix my egg. Ryan went right over and put her easter egg back together. Teigan lend over and kissed him on the cheek and said I love you daddy. People can say whatever they want about Ryan but the one thing he was, was a really good dad.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 4:55PM

Ray SternAuthor Profile Page says:What a chilling comment.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 5:03PM

MaryJane says:”Good Dads” don’t kill their children. “Good Dads” don’t kill their children.”Good Dads” don’t kill their children.”Good Dads” don’t kill their children.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 7:47PM

Sorry we can’t stomach the father rights agenda anymore….remember…

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

GOOD FATHERS DON’T KILL

http://www.indystar.com/article/20090623/LOCAL0503/906230356/

MURDERER

MURDERER

BROWNSBURG, Ind. — In the last minutes of Father’s Day, police believe, a Brownsburg man violently stabbed his estranged wife to death.The couple’s two daughters, ages 8 and 12, slept with their mother as the attack began before midnight Sunday. The girls ran and escaped injury, police said.

“Daddy stabbed Mommy,” one of the girls said in a 911 call after her father left early Monday. They hid in a closet about 20 minutes, police said.

Joseph L. Warnock, 41, is charged with murder in the death of Angela A. Warnock, 38. He was arrested about 9 p.m. Monday north of Brownsburg and taken to Hendricks County Jail in Danville.

Detectives said Angela Warnock was stabbed many times. Sheriff’s Detective Sgt. Charles Morefield described injuries to her arms as “defensive wounds, like she tried to resist.”

“This looked like a crime of passion,” he said.

A judge had ordered Joseph Warnock to stay away from the family home in the 10400 block of Splendor Way in the Eagle Crossing subdivision, about a half-mile west of 56th Street and Raceway Road on the Hendricks-Marion county line.

Shortly before midnight, Warnock parked in a church lot about a quarter-mile from the home, walked through farm fields and broke in the patio door, investigators believe. He stabbed his wife with a steak knife, a weapon he apparently took to the house, detectives said.

Police and their dogs tracked Warnock to the church lot but didn’t find him during a search around Eagle Creek Park and nearby areas on the Northwestside of Indianapolis.

Sheriff’s officials said a caller reported seeing a man matching Warnock’s description sitting next to a utility box in the 10500 block of East County Road 600 North — about a quarter-mile from the Warnock home.

An off-duty officer working night security at Eagle Crossing arrested Warnock without incident, sheriff’s officials said.

“Our officers recognized him immediately,” Morefield said. “He just put his hands in the air and gave up.”

Warnock was shirtless and wearing shorts and tennis shoes. He was dirty and had light scratches on his body — the kind that might come from running through twigs, Morefield said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31569447/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

FotoFlexer_Photo

Frank-Lombard-photo

Duke official charged in child sex case

Court documents say he identified himself online as ‘perv dad for fun’

updated 1:21 p.m. CT, Fri., June 26, 2009//

WASHINGTON – A Duke University official has been arrested and charged with offering a 5-year-old boy for sex.

Frank Lombard, the school’s associate director of the Center for Health Policy, was arrested after an Internet sting, according to the FBI’s Washington field office and the city’s police department.

According to an affidavit by District of Columbia Police Detective Timothy Palchak, an unidentified informant facing charges in a separate child sex case led authorities to Lombard.

Authorities said that Lombard tried to persuade a person — who he did not know was a police officer — to travel to North Carolina to have sex with a child.

The detective’s affidavit charges that Lombard identified himself online as “perv dad for fun” and said in an online chat that he had sexually molested the boy. The court papers say Lombard also invited the undercover detective to North Carolina to have sex with the boy and even suggested which hotel he should use.

Lombard was charged in federal court in Washington with attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with a child. If convicted, he could face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

He appeared in federal court in Durham, N.C., on Friday before Magistrate Judge Wallace Dixon. At the hearing, Lombard agreed to be transferred to Washington for a later court hearing. His lawyer did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs at Duke, said Lombard has been employed with Duke University since 1999. He is now on unpaid administrative leave.

“Duke is cooperating with the investigation,” Schoenfeld said. He said the university was notified of the incident after Lombard was arrested.

Authorities executed a search warrant Wednesday evening at Lombard’s home, according to court documents. The papers show investigators seized two webcams, five computers and a sex toy, among other items.

Good News For 2-Mo Old Child Abuse Victim

Updated 6/26/2009 9:35:29 PM
Posted By: Kevin Rowson
Casey Todd, 27, charged with sexually assaulting his 2-mo. old daughter.
CARROLL COUNTY, GA — The Carroll County Sheriff Office says a 2-month old baby who was sexually molested and battered by her father, has been released from the hospital. Chief Deputy Brad Robinson says “The baby is expected to make a full recovery.” Robinson says the baby is in the custody of the Department of Family and Children Services.
The baby suffered a fractured skull and a broken leg. Casey Todd, 27, of Carroll County was charged with Aggravated Child Molestation, Aggravated Battery and First Degree Child Cruelty. He was arrested on June 15th. Six days prior to the alleged abuse, the baby’s mother talked about her concerns for how her husband was treating the baby on-line.

On momslikeme.com, the baby’s mother expressed her concerns about her daughter’s well-being. Atlanta’s Momslikeme.com web site is owned and run by 11Alive’s parent company Gannett.

We are not identifying the mother or her daughter for their protection.

On June 9th the mother wrote: “Help me please my daughter is not even two months and she’s has already had little bruises on her arms and legs and back. Her daddy is really rough with her. And every time he picks her up she screams and don’t stop.”

“I’ve talked to him and told him if I seen one more bruise on her he’s gone and he’s doing much better with her, but she still screams, I still think he hurts her but I don’t see anything.”

But one day later the mother backed off the serious nature of her first post and wrote: “Well I think he’s just a little rough with her. There not like blue or black bruises but there little red ones. I know he’s not doing it on purpose.”

“I asked the doctor if she bruises easy and she said its possible.”

“Thanks for everything everybody I really appreciate it.”

The Carroll County Sheriff Office says Todd’s own mother questioned how her son treated his daughter, but said she never would have expected what allegedly happened.

On the same day the baby’s mother posted her concerns, she also entered her husband into a photo contest on the moms like me website. The baby’s mother posted a picture of Todd holding his baby daughter. The mother called him “The greatest dad ever.”

Father and Murderer Leslie Schuler Didn’t Want to be a “Visitor” to His Child Anymore

http://www.boston. com/news/ local/massachuse tts/articles/ 2009/06/25/ life_support_ for_boy_in_ fathers_day_ beating_expected _to_be_removed/

Seven year-old Nathaniel Turner will be taken off of life support following a brutal father’s day beating by none other than his father. According to what I have gathered from the media, this case has many twists and turns–almost every one of them a relevant issue that I continuously write about…It is all very confusing but I’ll try to sort it out.

Father Leslie Schuler was an absent father who paid child support when he felt like it.

There was a paternity test–don’t know if the father initiated, or perhaps the mother was on government assistance and thus the Child Support Office would have surely gone after their money the money due to the child. After paternity was established, a child support order was issued.

At some time, the mother, Alicia Taylor, asked for child support to be increased whilst simultaneously, father Leslie Schuler asked for visitation. No mention if perhaps the Child Support Office or the local fatherhood groups/program put this nonsense (asking for visitation) into the father’s head (see The Purpose of Child Support Enforcement). And God knows how both the fatherhood groups and the Child Support Office target Black men. Oh, whoops, my bad, the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) and the fatherhood groups ARE THE SAME THING!!! (see The Office of Child Support Enforcement Wants to Promoted Both Agreed Upon Child Support Orders and Visitation Orders)

The judge denied the child support increase request and also the visitation request because a Department of Revenue (DOR= Child Support) lawyer told the judge that the mother didn’t have custody of the child. I have heard this same scenario repeated many times in my circles. Remember that when DOR comes into your case, you, the custodial parent, are no longer a party to what was originally your own case.

But the father didn’t have the child at that time either. It seems that the Nathaniel had been with his grandmother in Alabama because the mother had “mental problems.” Could her mental problems have been related to…um…maybe not having enough money to support her son…or…um. ..maybe.. .her history [of abuse] with the father of her child? I don’t know. Just speculating.

However, the father does have a “lengthy criminal record.”

But what does this mean?

According to the fresh U.S. Department of Justice Special Report: Practical Implications of Current Domestic Violence Research for Law Enforcement, Judges, and Prosecutors:

Most studies agree that the majority of domestic violence perpetrators that come to the attention of criminal justice or court authorities have a prior criminal history for a variety of nonviolent and violent offenses against males as well as females, and of a domestic or nondomestic nature.

…Similarly, 84.4 percent of men arrested for domestic violence in Massachusetts had
prior criminal records, averaging a little more than 13 prior charges (resulting from five to six arrests) — including four for property offenses, three for offenses against persons, three for major motor vehicle offenses, two for alcohol/drug offenses, one for public order violations, and 0.14 for sex offenses.

More eye opening, in light of the fact that many men are not charged or convicted (money and power)…you know, since “false allegations” are so prevalent:

Even if abusers have no prior arrest records, they may be known to local police..

Studies of abusers brought to court for protective orders find similarly high rates of criminal histories, ranging from slightly more than 70 percent in Texas to 80 percent in Massachusetts.

Anyway, moving forward, since most of the corruption is occurring with the law enforcement, judges, and prosecutors who don’t give a damn about the report…

Of course DCF is covering its ass saying that they investigate people before they give them custody. When the hell did they start doing that? And obviously, absent father Leslie Schuler wasn’t a part of this investigation.

And CPS won’t comment on whether they were previously involved with the family. Well, of course they won’t comment if there could be any possibility of negligence on their behalf. CPS, like DCF and DOR/CSE are all government entities.

Somehow, the grandmother is lead to believe that the father has court-ordered summer visitation with Nathaniel. She never sees an order, but want to be sure she is in compliance with the law. Grandmas don’t want to be caught up in no shit (ask Eddy Curry’s child’s grandmother). BUT, somehow, no one from the court can find any order granting custody or visitation to the father. WTF?

And so, the father gets his wish to “meet the child and build a relationship,” and while he is doing so, proceeds to emotionally and physically abuse his son Nathaniel who has ADD (which, by the way is an oh-so common condition that manifests itself during and after abuse). This ends in the father’s day demise of the young boy.

Father Leslie Schuler is originally charged with assault and battery. Additionally, his girlfriend, Tiffany Hyman, is charged with the same for failing-to-protect. There goes that infamous woman-only charge again. Failure-to-protect.

Now I have read the comments on the article and they really paint girlfriend Tiffany out to be a monster accomplice. I MAJORLY disagree, based on the little bit on info that we have so far.

Tiffany is 28 years old. Is she a mother also? Does it matter? Was she responsible for this child? If so, who made her responsible? And is she legally responsible?

I know no one wants to hear the “maybe she was a victim of abuse, too” argument, because society is woman-blaming. ..but I have to present this to you:

  • Are we, as a society, saying that it is some random person’s responsibility to protect other people?
  • Is it some random person’s responsibility to protect someone just because that person is a child? Or disabled? Or what?
  • In which scenarios must we intervene? And who gets to decide if we properly intervened, or not?
  • What about the risk to ourselves?
  • Are we saying that every person is required by law to take on the hero/heroine/ shero role given some specific or non-specific situation?

This is major!!!

Unless Tiffany participated in the beating, I think it is insane to hold her accountable. We could have had two dead human beings.

Why don’t we hold Child Support, DCF and the legal system responsible?

And then, to top it off, bringing the child off of life support is now a public forum with the decision subject to a judge’s approval. Is this necessary? Can’t families make decisions for their own loved ones. The government fucked this whole thing up and now it wants end-of-life decision-making powers?

Fatherhood. Fatherless. Visitation. Child custody. Child Support. DCF. CPS. Judges. Children. Access/Visitation. Your tax dollars

Who’s paying attention?

http://www.madhunt.com/paulette-macdonal-20090629.html

bat girl

Bradford fire wants Alliston’s ‘Bat Girl’ to pay for broken truck

Posted June 29, 2009

An Alliston woman charged with mischief for climbing the Cookstown Outlet Mall’s water tower in April is facing about $50,000 in potential restitution costs, including a $36,921 bill by the Bradford fire department because the truck that responded to the call, broke down on the way back to the station.

Paulette MacDonald, dressed as Bat Girl, climbed the tower to draw attention to Parental Alienation Awareness Day, made a second court appearance last week, and learned from the Crown’s disclosure the total cost being sought by South Simcoe Police, Innisfil Fire, and Bradford Fire, is $48,944.

Ms. MacDonald had scaled the tower before sunrise, unfurled a banner supporting her cause, then spent several hours unnoticed before “I finally yelled down to a group of young ladies coming out of the mall and requested that she notify the mall security for me.”

Police were called, as were firefighters, first from Innisfil, but then Bradford for its aerial truck.

“When the fireman asked me to come down the ladder of the firetruck, I didn’t want to,” said Ms. MacDonald in a press release from the group Fathers 4 Justice (F4J). “I felt much safer getting back down the way I came up.”

The F4J has also weighed into the situation, suggesting that Bradford should thank “Bat Girl.”

“In my eyes, Ms. MacDonald should receive thanks for highlighting flaws in the fire department’s equipment before it was actually needed in an emergency,” said Kris Titus, F4J National Coordinator. “This might have more to do with the competence of their maintenance system than our featherweight superhero. We’re obviously glad that she was safe during the rescue, considering the circumstances.”

Ms. MacDonald is due back in Bradford court July 23.

Click here to send a Letter to the Editor.

Dr. William H. Ayres appeared in a Redwood City courtroom Friday but did not enter a plea. Photo courtesy of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Dept. via AP

Dr. William H. Ayres appeared in a Redwood City courtroom Friday but did not enter a plea. Photo courtesy of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Dept. via AP

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/07/MNGTTP4OGV1.DTL

Stain doesn’t wash off,’ psychiatrist’s accuser says

Boys 9, 11, 12 in molestation case; probe found 21 alleged victims

John Coté, Elizabeth Fernandez, Chronicle Staff Writers

Saturday, April 7, 2007

Dr. William H. Ayres impressed colleagues as an articulate, accomplished child psychiatrist with a civic bent, and San Mateo County officials once lauded him for “his tireless effort to improve the lives of children.”

but for some of the 2,000 patients he saw in his private office over the past four decades, Ayres allegedly scarred their lives instead.

“It’s like a stain that doesn’t wash off,” said Greg Hogue, 37, of Santa Rosa, one of 21 men who prosecutors say have accused Ayres of molesting them as boys as far back as 1969. “He is trained to know exactly what kind of damage he is causing and is doing it anyway. That’s what blows me away.”

Ayres, 75, a former president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, appeared Friday in a Redwood City courtroom after his arrest at his San Mateo home Thursday night. He did not enter a plea to 14 molestation counts alleging that he masturbated three boys in his office from 1991 through 1996, when they were 9, 11 and 12 years old.

The alleged victims, all now in their 20s, are not named in court documents. Ayres, who is married and once served on a children and family commission with San Mateo County District Attorney Jim Fox and Supervisor Richard Gordon, faces up to 112 years in prison if convicted, prosecutors said.

During the four-year criminal investigation, 21 men accused Ayres of molesting them as children, prosecutor Melissa McKowan said, but childhood sexual assault charges could be brought in only three cases because the statute of limitations for such crimes is 10 years or until the victim turns 28.

Several alleged victims and a social worker wondered how Ayres could continue receiving dozens of referrals from the juvenile justice system for nearly two decades after the first complaint was lodged.

“He continued to be sent families and kids who put their trust in him when the county knew that there was this report put in by me and possibly others,” said Jeff Lugerner, who was a licensed clinical social worker when he brought a complaint to authorities in 1987 after Hogue told him Ayres had fondled him at age 15. “That’s what’s shocking to me. How do you continue to send people to somebody like that when you have had a claim filed against them?”

San Mateo police investigated the 1987 complaint and determined it was unfounded, the social services report read. County Counsel Thomas Casey said he couldn’t comment on how the county handled earlier complaints against Ayres.

For decades, the psychiatrist with the ruddy face and reddish beard — now turned gray — was a fixture in San Mateo County mental health circles. The county’s juvenile justice system, its court-appointed attorney program, pediatricians and social workers all referred patients to him for years.

He evaluated a patient referred by Juvenile Court Judge Marta Diaz as recently as March 2003, even though San Mateo police or the county Social Services Department had received at least three complaints of molestation by that time, including Hogue’s report with the department in June 1987, records show.

Police also investigated a Folsom state prison inmate’s allegation that Ayres had molested him, according to the transcript of police Detective Randall Billingsley’s 2004 deposition in a civil case brought by a former patient.

The inmate, who had been convicted of armed robbery, told a nurse during an evaluation at Atascadero State Hospital that Ayres had molested him during court-ordered sessions, Billingsley said. The detective said he was unclear on the outcome of that original investigation by his department. The inmate refused to talk to Billingsley when he followed up about 10 years later, the detective said.

A third incident was reported to San Mateo police in November 2002, records show. The alleged victim balked when police asked him to try to get Ayres to confess over a recorded phone call or to wear a recording device and confront the psychiatrist in person, the police report read.

That victim later filed the civil suit against Ayres after a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court ruling struck down a state law that had retroactively extended the statute of limitations for child molestation and allowed prosecutions years after the alleged crimes occurred.

County and court payments to Ayres stopped shortly before that lawsuit was filed in December 2003, documents show. The lawsuit ended with a confidential settlement in July 2005, after which Ayres’ attorney said the psychiatrist did not concede any wrongdoing.

Margaret Kemp, who worked as a San Mateo County judge from 1978 until 2004, said Ayres had a “glowing” reputation, and she referred as many as 200 cases involving juvenile sex offenders to him.

“He always did good work for the court,” Kemp said. “I never had reason to question him. … When we had kids who were charged with sex offenses, we would send them to him for evaluation.”

In an interview Friday, Kemp mused that her words sounded similar to those voiced in her courtroom by supporters of accused child molesters.

“Every time we saw someone charged with child molest, family and friends would stand up in court — even after the person had pleaded guilty — and say there had to be a mistake, he wouldn’t do such a thing,” said Kemp. “I hear echoes of that in what I’m saying to you. Oftentimes, child molesters, particularly middle-class, educated people, are completely unsuspected by people who live with them or work with them.”

Dr. David Schwartz, who worked for San Mateo County from 1965 until his retirement in 1987, said he initially thought highly of Ayres but later grew suspicious when a youth, who was living in a group home, adamantly refused additional treatment by Ayres.

“I had referred him to Dr. Ayres, but after a visit or two, he refused to go back and he wouldn’t talk about it,” said Schwartz. “His social worker and I were both concerned. That was my first clue.”

His second clue came years later, when a San Mateo detective consulted Schwartz, asking whether it was common practice for a child psychiatrist to perform a genital examination with a latex glove.

“I said absolutely not,” Schwartz said. “I told him that it was entirely inappropriate, unnecessary and potentially very destructive to a child. He did not name Dr. Ayres, but when I said Dr. Ayres to the detective, he nodded. I put two and two together.

“Child psychiatrists have a lot of power, they are almost priest-like,” Schwartz said. “These kids were reluctant to see a psychiatrist in the first place. In the child community, going to a shrink is something to be ashamed of. It’s a trust issue, and betrayal of trust is unconscionable.”

One of Ayres’ alleged victims, who is now dead, was detained in a juvenile facility for a few days in 1973, when he was 14, for drinking beer in a park. At the facility, Ayres had him strip naked and lie on an examination table while the doctor fondled his genitals, the victim later told his mother.

When news of the civil lawsuit settlement was released two years ago, her son told her about the alleged molestation, then went to San Mateo police, the mother said.

“They said the case was too old, but he insisted they make a report,” the mother said Friday. “My son carried this with him all his life. He had thought he was the only one.”


The chargesDr. William H. Ayres, a prominent San Mateo psychiatrist, is accused of 14 felony counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14. He allegedly molested three boys repeatedly between 1991 and 1996 while they were his patients.

citylights2_tease_t245

By Ernie Grimm | Published Wednesday, July 1, 2009

You know those framed certificates and diplomas that hang in your doctor’s office? It’s reassuring to see them, isn’t it? It’s nice to know that the pediatrician who treats your children has not only graduated from medical school and survived a hospital residency but is also certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. Before having that $4000 dental implant done, it’s comforting to look up from your reclined chair and see a framed certificate from the American Board of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery hanging on the wall. The two boards just mentioned are legitimate and respected, so you’d be right to feel comforted. But what if the certificates on the wall could be had by anybody, even a cat? How would you feel then?

Dr. Emad Tadros felt reassured when, according to court papers, he “noticed many impressive and professional-looking frames” hanging in the office of Dr. Stephen Doyne, a psychologist and well-known “730 custody evaluator” who works on custody cases in San Diego Family Court. The divorce-help website divorcewizards.com says, “The 730 evaluation is a study of the family, its members and their relationship with the intent of restructuring parental rights and responsibilities concerning their children. It is requested by the parents or ordered by a judge when parties cannot decide on the best custody arrangements for their child. One cannot simply go to court and present an individual side of the argument in hopes of a ruling in one spouse’s favor. There must be evidence to support a position and a judge, not knowing the family, will depend on the opinion of a mental health professional to describe the parties involved and the nature of their interaction.”

But the mental health professionals are not hired by the court. They’re hired jointly by the parties in the custody proceedings. Tadros was in Doyne’s office to decide whether to hire him to perform a 730 evaluation in his 2005 custody case. “Doyne reassured me,” Tadros continues in his court declaration, “that he was Board Certified in his line of work of forensic psychology and that the evaluation would be confidential. I trusted and relied upon Doyne’s representations about his credentials and about confidentiality, and on that basis I entered into an agreement with Doyne for him to be the custody evaluator.”

Tadros, who is a psychiatrist and the vice chief of Scripps Behavioral Health Services, came to regret the decision to hire Doyne (for $8000) upon observing the latter’s methods. “Being a board certified psychiatrist,” Tadros states in a lawsuit he later filed against Doyne, “I noticed that Doyne’s performance was poor and substandard. I also noticed what appeared to be unethical practices, such as billing for things that never occurred, and incorrect billing records.”

Tadros adds that Doyne “never contacted my therapist even once as the court recommended. In addition, I was never able to confirm the validity or truthfulness of Doyne’s contact with the mother’s therapist.”

Doyne turned in his custody evaluation on September 30, 2005. He signed it as a “Diplomate of American College of Forensic Examiners.” Unhappy with the findings in Doyne’s custody evaluation and deeply suspicious of his professionalism, Tadros began investigating Doyne’s qualifications. He discovered, his court declaration says, that “The ‘American College of Forensic Examiners’ and the ‘American Board of Forensic Examiners’ are sham organizations known as ‘vanity boards’ or ‘certification mills’…run by the same con artist, Robert O’Block, who sells fake mail-order credentials and ‘diplomas.’ Both of these organizations have specifically been exposed as mail-order credentialing shams in various media and professional journal articles, including…a Wall Street Journal article that called the American College of Forensic Examiners a ‘mail-order credentialing organization for which the applicants need only pay $350.00 and pass an ethics exam.’ ”

A 2002 article in the online journal of the American Bar Association chronicles how a psychologist obtained from organizations, one of them affiliated with O’Block, several professional certifications for his cat under the name Zoe D. Katze.

In repeated correspondence beginning in summer 2006, Tadros says he “wrote to Doyne and requested some of the records in my custody case. Doyne responded by providing me some but not all of what I requested.”

The court files include a copy of Doyne’s response letter, which names him a diplomate of the American College of Forensic Psychologists, not Forensic Examiners as was on the custody evaluation. Subsequent correspondence from Doyne contained the same appellation. But no American College of Forensic Psychologists exists. There is an American College of Forensic Psychology. Tadros contacted this organization. The college, Tadros says, “told me in writing they [never] heard of Doyne and they do not have Diplomates.”

Tadros also called the American Board of Professional Psychology, which he describes in court papers as “the only legitimate certifying body recognized by all state licensing boards and the American Psychological Association.… They checked their records and told me they have no record and have never had a record of Dr. Stephen Doyne as one of their Diplomates.”

Tadros filed a motion in family court to obtain Doyne’s curriculum vitae and records. In June 2007, Judge Jeffrey Bostwick ordered Doyne to release them. Doyne produced the curriculum vitae, Tadros says, but not the records. Instead, he “appealed the family court’s order. While the appeal was still pending, Doyne gave private case information to the California Association of Psychology Providers (CAPP) so CAPP would file an Amicus Brief in his favor.” The association did file a brief on behalf of Doyne.

“Many of the credentials that Doyne claimed in his CV, letterhead, and to [me],” Tadros says in his lawsuit, “were false, fraudulent and misleading.” The curriculum lists Doyne as an adjunct professor at the University of San Diego School of Law and an instructor at the University of California, San Diego. “However,” Tadros states, “both of those Universities have denied in writing that they have any record of Doyne.” Copies of those letters are lodged as exhibits in the court file.

“Doyne’s CV,” Tadros continues, “states he was an Instructor at California School of Professional Psychology/CSPP (now Alliant University). However, said University, too, has denied, in writing, having any record of Doyne.… Despite numerous formal requests by me asking Doyne to substantiate the credentials listed in his CV, at no time has Doyne done so. Doyne limited his reply to a letter from his attorney…stating the law does not require him to substantiate anything in his CV.”

Tadros’s lawsuit against Doyne alleges fraud, negligence, breach of contract, and violation of the California Business and Professions Code. The allegations are based on Doyne’s misrepresentation of his credentials and on Doyne’s divulging private information from Tadros’s custody case during an October 20, 2007 presentation to a conference of custody evaluators. Tadros seeks “damages against [Doyne] in an amount to be proven at trial” plus “court costs and attorneys’ fees.”

catdr

YOU GET A BUNCH OF VICTIMS TOGETHER AND DEMAND JUSTICE….THIS MEANS YOU!!!!!

By the way Sacramento…..make sure you audit about ALL the abusers that got custody of their children. Take a look at restraining orders, past abuse record and BELIEVE THE VICTIMS….. ie; children, women

CAVE_Photo

State orders audit of Marin family court

By Gary Klien

MediaNews staff

NOVATO — Prodded by Sen. Mark Leno and other lawmakers, the state Joint Legislative Audit Committee voted Wednesday to investigate the family courts in Marin and Sacramento counties.

The audit will focus on the use, and potential misuse, of court-appointed specialists in family-law disputes, such as mediators, investigators and therapists.

Critics say such appointees can form incestuous and incompetent networks more concerned with generating fees than helping children through painful custody fights.

“It becomes a service mill, a cottage industry of sorts,” Leno said Wednesday. “Maybe state law needs to be changed.”

Marin and Sacramento counties were chosen for the audit because of the number of litigants reporting problems and filing complaints, said Ali Bay, a spokeswoman for Leno. But any changes recommended by the auditors could inspire new statewide legislation.

The audit is expected to take four months and cost about $160,000. The start date has not been determined.

Leno said that because of the state budget crisis, the audit committee — which consists of seven assembly members and seven senators — could only approve two audits Wednesday. Six were under consideration, he said.

Leno, a Democrat representing Marin and parts of San Francisco and Sonoma County, said the committee voted unanimously for the family court audit, demonstrating the widespread doubts about the system.

“People are concerned the health and well-being of children might be at risk”, Leno said. “I’ve had mothers and fathers in tears in my office, telling me their sad stories.

“Minimally, we have to look into this and see what the truth is.”

The audit was approved two months after Marin Superior Court issued a report extolling its efforts to increase public confidence in its family-law division. The changes followed a turbulent decade for the family court, whose critics launched a fierce but unsuccessful recall campaign against several judges and a former district attorney.

To improve the system, the court announced, officials cleared a backlog of 1,500 stalled family law cases; translated legal forms and instructions in Spanish; conducted a public survey on court performance; and established a special twice-monthly calendar to help litigants who are representing themselves, according to the report.

But the report still didn’t address the core issue of the mediators and other specialists appointed to advise the courts, said Kathleen Russell of the Center for Judicial Excellence, a Marin watchdog organization.

“Needless to say, we’re thrilled that we had such unanimous support from the committee for the audit request,” Russell said. “We spent 17 months working with legislators to educate them about the problems. It’s really the end of a long journey, but we’ll be working with the auditors as well.”

The state auditors are expected to investigate how court appointees are selected, how they are trained and evaluated, how their fees are established, and how complaints against them are resolved, among other issues.

Judge Verna Adams, a former divorce lawyer who is Marin’s presiding judge, said she welcomes the audit because it could clear the record and instill more confidence in the court.

“We’re happy to have this happen,” Adams said. “We really would welcome a well-designed, professional review of our family law procedures.

“We’re confident that we’re following the law. If they want to do an audit of best practices, Marin is the best place for them to be.”



It is the opinion of this blog owner that DV shelters and/or Visitation Centers AND especially CPS workers/Social Services that this case is proof enough that you don’t do enough or anything at all. The CPS workers that I’ve had the “pleasure” of dealing with have been totally useless in protecting my child. Stay tuned because I plan on exposing every last one of you.

Supervised visitation centers: A safe haven for children and mothers amid threats of violence

But many facilities struggle with a lack of state support and declines in private contribution s

For Michael Connolly’s two young sons and their mother, the McLean County Family Visitation Center was a safe haven, a place where the boys could meet their erratic father under the watchful eyes of clinical social workers.

Connolly was prohibited from removing his sons from the facility in Bloomington. Carefully staggered arrival and departure times prevented him from crossing paths with the children’s mother, who secured a protective order against him after he threatened to “cut her open” and commit suicide.

It wasn’t until after a family court judge granted Connolly unsupervised visitation that he abducted Duncan, 9, and Jack, 7, whose bodies were discovered last month in the back seat of their father’s car in rural Putnam County. After the apparent double-homicide, Connolly hanged himself, officials said.

“In this case, the supervised visitation center worked really, really well,” said Alicia Aiken, a professor of family law at DePaul University. “It was a controlled setting that kept everyone safe.”

More than half a dozen centers like the one in Bloomington have sprung up in Illinois during the last decade, drawing rave reviews from attorneys, judges and other experts. They are viewed as one of the most valuable ways to keep victims of domestic violence and their children safe after a divorce or separation.

But many of these facilities do not have adequate resources to meet demand and struggle with a lack of state support and declines in private contributions, officials say. At the same time, federal “Safe Haven” start-up grants that provide crucial funding are phased out over time.

Last fall, a reduction in federal grant money forced the Bloomington center to all but eliminate supervised visits. DuPage County’s center, meanwhile, has a limit of six weekly visits.

And at the non-profit Branch Family Institute, which operates one of Chicago’s three centers, officials wonder how long it can survive. Federal grant money has been trimmed from $75,000 in recent years to $36,500, and funding from the city has remained relatively flat at about $50,000.

“We used to be hanging by a string, but now we’re hanging by a thread,” said Brenda Thompson, the institute’s president.

When such centers are unavailable, judges often place the responsibility for supervising visits with friends of the parents, relatives or other community members who are often untrained and ill-equipped to deal with the challenges and possible dangers, experts say.

Private supervision services are available, but at a cost of up to $150 an hour, they are out of reach for many families.

Some publicly supported centers charge a small fee, such as $5 an hour for parents who use the one in Rock Island County. The three centers in Chicago provide free services to city residents.

Apna Ghar, which means “Our Home” in Hindi and Urdu, is perhaps the oldest center of this kind in the state. Launched in 1991, it occupies space on two floors of an old brick building in Uptown and serves about 45 families at any given time.

The custodial parent usually arrives 15 minutes before a visit begins, remaining in a locked waiting room on the sixth floor while a staff member escorts the child to the ninth floor. The non-custodial parent unites with the child there in a comfortable room furnished with couches, toys and a television.

The visits, typically one hour a week, are supervised by a clinical social worker trained in domestic violence.

When the visit is over, the non-custodial parent remains on the ninth floor for 15 minutes, allowing the custodial parent and child time to leave the building. The non-custodial parent is escorted out and helped with any safety precautions, said Bob Gallenbach, a supervisor.

“We have an alarm, but we’ve never had to use it,” he said.

On a recent afternoon, a young mother was in the waiting room. She said she filed for divorce last fall when the abusive behavior of her alcoholic husband caused her to fear for their child’s safety. The father was granted unsupervised visitation until his wife proved to a judge that he was getting drunk during visits with the child, said his wife, who asked not to be identified.

The supervised visits, begun a few months ago at Apna Ghar, made a huge difference, the woman said. “I know my child will come back to me in one piece.”

Under Illinois law, the non-custodial parent almost always retains visitation rights, forcing interactions that can pose grave risks in cases of domestic violence, mental illness and substance abuse.

In December 2007, Herbert Poleate Jr., fatally shot his estranged wife during an exchange of their children in the parking lot of an automotive store in south suburban Lansing. The Illinois Department of Corrections employee then turned the gun on himself.

And as the Michael Connolly case underscores, non-custodial parents can use visitation as a chance to flee with the children.

In January, the judge granted Connolly alternate weekend and Wednesday visits, with pickups and drop-offs at a police station. He never returned with his two boys after a March 8 exchange, prompting authorities to launch a nationwide manhunt that ended when the bodies were found three weeks later.

When judges in family and domestic violence courts order supervision during visitations and exchanges, it’s an attempt to prevent this very thing from happening, experts say.

Moshe Jacobius, presiding judge in Cook County Court’s Domestic Relations Division, said the supervised visitation centers have been “a tremendous help.”

Many centers were opened with the help of the federal grants. Between 2002 and 2008, more than $3.5 million was awarded to them throughout Illinois. The cutoff point for such money varies from center to center. Nationally, federal funding for the program increased slightly, officials say.

Chicago’s three centers, which get an additional $135,000 in combined financial assistance from the city each year, have served as one of the federal program’s four national demonstration sites.

A new three-year Safe Haven award for $395,000 will help fund a supervised visitation center in Joliet. But as the federal start-up grants are trimmed, officials say the centers have had a hard time finding other financial support.

In 2000, the Illinois General Assembly passed a measure permitting counties to create fees for court filings to help fund the centers. DuPage County seized the opportunity, charging an $8 filing fee. So did McLean County, but so far Cook County hasn’t taken that step.

“In these economic times, it’s been very hard,” said Leslie Landis, manager of Chicago’s domestic-violence project who distributes funds to the city’s centers. “We’re trying to sustain the centers when they really need to grow.”

Meanwhile, officials at Chicago’s centers say the visits they oversee for hundreds of parents each year generally last no longer than eight or nine months. They usually end when a judge grants the non-custodial parent unsupervised visitation.

Experts emphasize that months of supervised visits do not guarantee that unsupervised meetings will be safe, as the Connolly case illustrates.

“A lot of judges see time passing as evidence that the problem is cured,” said Denice Markham, executive director of Life Span Center for Legal Services and Advocacy in Chicago, which represents victims of domestic violence. “Just because the parent complied in a controlled setting doesn’t mean it’s safe to grant unsupervised visitation.”

mtwohey@tribune. com

credibility

This one is somewhat shocking to me…but not totally.

We reposted a post from a mom’s group in Indiana which was pretty shocking….an Indiana ”shared parenting” advocate by the name of Stuart Showalter blamed a mother (Angie Warnock) for her own death when her violent husband stabbed her to death on Father’s Day in front of their children.  She had gotten a Protective Order against him three days prior because she feared him.  Stuart claimed she was practicing “parental alienation” because she went to get the Protective Order, and blamed her for her own death because she enflamed the situation by getting it.  Stuart’s view in his comment on the above post suggests any father, violent or not, deserves shared parenting.  While I have no problem with sharing parenting, I do have a problem with abusive, violent parents of either gender sharing parenting of children.

showalter“Shared Parenting” Advocate Stuart Showalter of Indiana

Stuart is “Executive Director” of the Indiana Custodial Rights Advocates and runs a “law blog.”  This is also a front for “Boone County Fathers.”  Stuart claims he has the ear of many politicians in the State of Indiana.  I wonder if they really know who they are talking to and that he is accusing dead mothers of so-called “parental alienation.”  If Indiana politicians are listening to this nutcase, God help them all.

As I always had thought and feared, many father’s rights organizations are run by violent men like this.  They are accusatory…blaming mothers for any and everything.  They are huge supporters of using the so-called “parental alienation” claim.  Their very drivel is abusive.  Unfortunately, good fathers hurting from a break in their relationship are lured into these groups, a goal of these nutcase leaders to make themselves look legitimate.  One of the commenter’s on our repost noted he was probably a neonazi…and they were right!  Yesterday, the mom’s group posted a story about it…and I thought it was just too good to let go…

Wanna see a little of Stuart’s history:

933 F.2d 573

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stuart W. SHOWALTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-1361.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Argued Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided May 30, 1991.

Robert M. Barnes, Susan E. Heckard, Asst. U.S. Attys., Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff-appellee.

Daniel J. Coffey, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendant-appellant.

Before CUDAHY, RIPPLE, and MANION, Circuit Judges.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

1 Stuart Showalter pleaded guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861(d). He appeals the length and conditions of his supervised release. We remand for resentencing because the length of supervised release exceeds the amount authorized by statute, but affirm the conditions of Showalter’s supervised release imposed by the district court.I.

2 Showalter headed an Indianapolis organization called the “Pure American Freedom Party,” which was loosely associated with other white supremacist “skinhead” and “neo-Nazi” groups in Indiana and around the United States. Showalter, then 20 years old, was prominently featured in a July 1989 article in the Indianapolis Monthly magazine called “Skinhead Society: Should a Local Group of Neo-Nazis be Feared, Tolerated or Ignored?” The article described the weaponry in Showalter’s apartment, and discussed the group’s potential for committing acts of violence. This publicity apparently brought him to the attention of his landlords, who sought to evict him from his apartment (in a predominantly black neighborhood) for late payment of rent and violation of the lease by having too many occupants. Showalter failed to leave on time, and was seen outside the apartment brandishing a weapon, so the police were called in to assist in his departure. When he failed to respond to their request to drop his gun and come out, the police broke in and arrested him and another occupant.

II.
3 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Showalter pleaded guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm–a “Remington Wingmaster .12 gauge sawed-off shotgun with an obliterated serial number”–in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861(d). He was sentenced within the guidelines to 14 months imprisonment, followed by five years supervised release. The terms of supervised release included the condition that Showalter “shall not participate in, or associate with those who do participate in, the organization known as ’skinheads,’ or in any neo-Nazi organization.” Showalter appealed both the length and conditions of his supervised release.

III.
4 The government concedes the district court erred in imposing a five-year period of supervised release. Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(b)(2) provides that the maximum length of supervised release for a “Class C” felony–where the maximum term of imprisonment is between 10 and 25 years, pursuant to Sec. 3559(a)(3)–is three years. The maximum term for violating 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861(d) is 10 years. See 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5871. Thus, under guidelines Sec. 5D3.2(b)(2) (renumbered November 1, 1989 to Sec. 5D1.2(b)(2)), Showalter must receive a term of supervised release of “at least two years but not more than three years.” We remand to the district court for the purpose of adjusting the length of supervised release.

5 Showalter does not challenge the condition of supervised release that he not participate in white supremacist organizations, but does raise three related objections to the requirement that he avoid associating with other skinheads and neo-Nazis. We review the district court’s imposition of conditions of supervised release under the deferential “abuse of discretion” standard. United States v. Alexander, 743 F.2d 472, 479-80 (7th Cir.1984) (citations omitted).

6 He first contends that the condition lacks the “certainty” required by the new Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 “because skinheads and neo-nazis are not readily identifiable groups.” No case law is cited to support the contention that the Sentencing Reform Act was intended to limit the broad discretion given district courts to determine conditions of supervised release (formerly conditions of probation). See Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 220, 53 S.Ct. 154, 155, 77 L.Ed. 266 (1932); United States v. Williams, 787 F.2d 1182, 1185 (7th Cir.1986).

7 The district court placed similar conditions on Showalter during the time between the guilty plea and sentencing, and Showalter had no difficulty understanding them then. At the sentencing hearing, the district court reprimanded Showalter for writing a letter espousing his white supremacist views to a newspaper in Washington state.1 Showalter responded:As regards to this happening after my plea agreement, I was under the understanding I was not to hang out with the skinheads out on the street up in Broad Ripple, so forth, have them over at my house, things like that. I wasn’t aware that it covered giving my opinion to a newspaper.

8 We hold that the condition is sufficiently clear to put Showalter on notice regarding the parameters of the court’s restriction on his associational activities.

9 Next Showalter argues that the condition of probation is not specific enough to comply with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3563(b)(7), which allows the district court to order the defendant to “refrain from frequenting specified kinds of places or from associating unnecessarily with specified persons; …”. Pressed at oral argument, Showalter’s counsel did not say that these “specified persons” must be listed by name, but he did contend they must be specified to some greater, but unexplained, degree.

10 We first point out that the district court is empowered, under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(d), to impose “any other condition it considers to be appropriate.” That would seem to provide an independent authority for the district court’s decision here. Even so, we think the condition imposed by the district court is authorized by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3563(b)(7).

11 In Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554, 555 (9th Cir.1974), the Ninth Circuit upheld similar conditions of probation on a defendant who was convicted of unlawful exportation of firearms from the United States to the United Kingdom. These conditions prevented him from participating in any American Irish Republican movement, from belonging to any Irish organization, from participating in any Irish Catholic organization, from visiting any Irish pubs, and from accepting employment that would directly or indirectly associate him with any Irish organization. The court found that the conditions of probation … are not too vague and are reasonably related to the goals of probation and the accomplishment of public order and safety and … do not constitute an abuse of the Court’s discretion in the circumstances.

13Id., 502 F.2d at 557.

14 We cited Malone with approval in Alexander, 743 F.2d at 480-81, where we noted that district courts frequently were allowed to prevent defendants from being involved in different types of “gainful activity” as a condition of probation. While the restriction on Showalter’s associational activity is significant, it is no more significant than that approved in Malone, and it is justified by the court’s concern that Showalter not involve himself with those who might fuel his proclivity for lawbreaking.

15 Finally, Showalter suggests that this condition does not comport with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(d)(2)’s requirement that it involve “no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to deter future criminal conduct and protect the public from further crimes. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3553(a)(2)(B), (C) and (D). However, the district court’s explanation of the condition adequately supports depriving Showalter of the liberty to associate with skinheads and neo-Nazis:

16 Because those groups embrace violence and the threat of violence as a method of advancing their views, I find that your association with them would create a high likelihood that you would be drawn into that same behavior, and that’s the reason for the restriction.

The court also reminded Showalter that (17) supervised release is intended to be a period of time when you’re under close supervision by the court to make sure that after you get out of prison you can abide by the terms and conditions that hopefully will keep you within a lawful groove and keep you from slipping back into your criminal behavior.

18 After reviewing the entire record, including the magazine article about Showalter and his organization, we conclude the district court was correct that Showalter needs to be separated from other members of white supremacist groups to have a chance of staying out of trouble. This condition of supervised release therefore meets the statutory requirements of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(d)(2).

19 The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering special conditions of supervised release, and that portion of the sentence is affirmed. We remand to the district court to resentence on the length of supervised release in a manner consistent with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(b)(2), and guidelines Sec. 5D3.2(b)(2), now Sec. 5D1.2(b)(2).

20AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

1 Although the district court seemed to think the conditions placed on Showalter prior to sentencing should have at least discouraged him from writing controversial letters to newspapers, there is nothing to that effect in the conditions imposed at sentencing. This incident illustrates the importance of specificity in formulating conditions of supervised release.

Geez….I hope some people start waking up to the fact that dangerous individuals run groups like these…

DEAD BEAT DAD, DEAD BAT...ANY SIMILIARITY?

DEAD BEAT DAD, DEAD BAT...ANY SIMILIARITY?

The militant “father’s rights” group F4J is at it again. Although this blog doesn’t like spreading their hateful propaganda it is too good to pass up a chance to show their insanity.

Geoff Hibbert, an activist with the group has put his “life and freedom on the line” as he enters day 21 of his hunger strike.

What do you say to that? This is how a MAN acts in everyday life because he dresses and thinks he’s a superhero. Mr. Hibbert a.k.a. “THE M25 Batman” has been convicted by a jury after police had to halt traffic for several hours on the M25 highway in August 2008 and faces a 7 YEAR sentence.

So….you become a public nuisance, justice is SERVED to you and then you starve yourself over a 7 year stint in prison? Well, at least this is one father that won’t be able to murder his children…..for 7 years…..or less.

COFFMAN

San Jose man recounts murder-suicide that left wife dead

Shane Coffman kissed his wife goodbye, and opened the garage door in his San Jose home — expecting to slip on his shoes, drive his stepdaughter to Chinese school, and face a typical Monday morning at work. Instead the electrical engineer faced his wife’s ex-boyfriend.

He had a gun. It was pointed right at Coffman.

Before Coffman’s five-hour ordeal was over, he had dodged a hail of bullets, sprinting down the street in his socks. Neighboring townhomes and a mobile home park were evacuated, and San Jose police flooded the area, believing Coffman’s wife was being held hostage.

But Ying “Brandi” He was dead, slain in her kitchen in front of her 9-year-old daughter. After fatally shooting her, Jian Ming “Nelson” Liang turned the gun on himself, according to police.

On Thursday, for the first time since the murder-suicide in their Montecito Vista townhouse, Coffman told his story in an exclusive interview with the Mercury News. He described how his pretty, cheerful wife had come into his life after leaving China and then her obsessive, troubled boyfriend. He described in detail what happened that day as the bullets cut past him, one tearing his earlobe. And he told of his grief and confusion that no one could save his wife.

“We were starting a very good life together,” Coffman said. “We just bought a house. We were elated. Life was good. Now I have to accept what happened and deal with the consequences. “

“But I’m also

asking, ‘Is there something else that should have been done?’ ” he said. “I expected something could have been done right then to stop the torment of my wife.”

His family’s tragedy began that morning with Coffman facing the armed Liang.

“I froze, he froze,” Coffman, 35, said. “He was nervous, I think. He dropped his clip on the floor. I went for it. He picked it up and ran away to reload.”

Liang came back quickly, firing. Bullets whizzed past Coffman. His stepdaughter ran inside to hide. His wife phoned 911. It was 8:39 a.m.

Coffman ran inside. Liang fired again and again, chasing him out of the townhome. Coffman ran down the street, followed by Liang in his gold Lexus.

“I was thinking, ‘He wants to take me out first.’ “

Then Liang appeared to drive away. Coffman ran back home, only to find it locked. He later realized Liang had somehow returned to the home first. Coffman decided to run for help at a neighbor’s.

His stepdaughter joined him minutes later, screaming, “Mommy’s bleeding all over the place.”

Police arrived. It was 8:49 a.m.

Try at establishing contact

The San Jose Police Department’s MERGE team — also known as SWAT — arrived at the scene soon after patrol officers. At this point, police believe the woman was dying or dead. But the elite team did not enter the home because there were no signs of shooting or life inside, sources told the Mercury News. Facing earlier reports of gun shots and then silence, they set up a perimeter, and tried unsuccessfully to establish contact. When they finally determined there were no threats, they went in.

Inside they found the two bodies.

Coffman is left with a stepdaughter and memories.

He and Brandi met seven years ago while she was waitressing. He was her regular customer and then her friend. He became her husband in South Lake Tahoe two years ago.

The couple had long been leery of Liang and worried he could be capable of violence. A 2003 stalking charge was dismissed against Liang for threatening to kill the two of them, even though Coffman said neither he nor his wife were called as witnesses.

Ying He and Liang came to the United States from China in 1999, Coffman said. They had a baby girl in the Bay Area on June 14, 2000. Liang sent the girl to live with his wealthy parents in Guangzhou, and because Ying He had pending immigration status, she couldn’t freely travel between the countries.

In 2006, Ying He discovered her daughter and Liang were living in Southern California. She also discovered, Coffman said, that her ex-boyfriend, a gambler, was short on cash.

“They made a deal,” Coffman said. “Brandi said she’d give Nelson some money and he said he’d give her their daughter.”

But Liang reneged on his part of the deal, Coffman said, and disappeared with the girl. Coffman and his wife hired an attorney to find Liang and fight for full custody. After about two years, Liang and the girl surfaced again in Southern California. In March, Liang didn’t pick his daughter up from school one day, and police reports show Liang told school officials in Arcadia that he no longer wanted to care for his child. He was soon arrested and pleaded no contest to child endangerment. The girl was put in state care.

Daughter home with Mom

Finally, on April 6, Ying He was able to bring her daughter home for the first time. They painted Easter eggs together. They went to therapy. They played ball in the yard. Ying He, by then a respiratory therapist at El Camino Hospital, took her daughter to work. Colleagues said she was beaming.

Liang still had visitation rights and weekly phone calls.

On Sunday, the day before the shooting, Liang called to speak with his daughter, asking her strangely specific questions about her schedule. Coffman believes Liang was casing the family for the attack.

When Coffman and his stepdaughter were about to go to New Concept Chinese School in Sunnyvale on Monday morning at 8:35 a.m., Liang was waiting.

Now, Coffman is trying to put back together his life, make funeral arrangements for a woman he calls “someone very special and a beautiful person inside,” and establish legal custody to raise his stepdaughter as his own.

“She’s a beautiful little girl,” Coffman said. “I’m going to provide for her the life that she deserves.”

COFFMAN

gal

GUARDIAN AD CHARGEM a.k.a. GUARDIAN AD LITEM

Appointed by a judge to act in a child’s best interest, some lawyers can also help themselves by billing a small fortune

By Bob Whitby

For most people who help kids entangled in the legal system, the only reward is the warm glow that comes from having done a good deed. For a lucky few, however, the payback is more pecuniary. Downright lucrative in some cases.How do you go from being a concerned citizen to being a concerned citizen who gets paid? By becoming a private guardian ad litem. But there are a few hurdles you’ll have to clear first.

First you’ll need a law degree, and membership in the Florida Bar helps to get in this club. Besides, there’s really no better way to meet and schmooze with family court judges, which is the second thing you want to do. Make sure the judges know you like kids.

Then sit back and wait for a juicy divorce or custody case to pop up, preferably one involving at least one rich parent able to pony up big time and several kids. You might have to handle a couple smaller cases for 1000 bucks or less to prove your worth. But sooner or later, if you’ve done your networking, the judge might remember you fondly and put your name on an order appointing a guardian ad litem in a contentious case involving well-heeled parents. If you’re extra lucky, the judge won’t dictate how much you can charge or how many hours you can put into the case. Now you’re in the money.

A guardian ad litem is a person appointed to act in a child’s best interest in legal proceedings, usually a shield between warring parents. The guardians are also investigators. In custody cases, for example, the court needs to know which parent is best suited to have primary custody. Parents who don’t want to lose their children are not the best sources of objective information, so it falls to the guardian ad litem to make a recommendation.

Every circuit court system in Florida has a publicly funded Guardian Ad Litem Program. Usually administered by a few overworked staffers, these programs recruit and train laypeople — non-lawyers — to be guardians ad litem, which is Latin for “guardians at law.” These guardians are volunteers; they serve because they want to help kids and are to be commended for it. Putting oneself in the middle of a disintegrating family is, as one guardian put it, “like sticking your head in a meat grinder.”

Volunteer guardians are assigned in cases where the parties cannot afford a private guardian. (Broward County is in desperate need of volunteer guardians, with about 1000 kids waiting for their services.)

But if a judge decides one party or the other can pay, then pay they must. That happens in a small percentage of cases and usually only in divorce or custody matters. Dependency cases, where abuse and neglect are the issue, tend to involve foster children and people who simply don’t have much money. As one guardian ad litem put it, “Dependency is the redheaded stepchild of the court house.”

A private guardian ad litem is almost always a lawyer (but isn’t serving in that capacity, which would be a conflict of interest), and that’s when the bills can start to mount.

Unless you regularly sit in on court proceedings, there is no way to determine which lawyers repeatedly get assigned as guardians ad litem. The county’s Guardian Ad Litem Program keeps tabs only on volunteers, not private, paid guardians.

Court watcher Eleanor Mendlein has sat through a lot of divorce and custody cases in the last few years, and she sees patterns in who gets assigned. “The same people get appointed over and over again,” says Mendlein. “It’s money. If you have deep pockets, you get due process.”

Through the court watchers, New Times found three instances in which paid guardians made big money — as much as $40,000-plus for a single case — advocating for children. Not surprisingly, such dollar figures raise questions of bias. If your ex is paying a guardian ad litem thousands of dollars, will the guardian be influenced by the one who foots the bill?

“The concern is real, but I don’t know if it’s justified,” says Melinda Brown, a family-law attorney who also works as a private guardian ad litem. “I deal with a whole lot more issues than who pays me.”

But the people who’ve been through the system in divorce or custody cases think differently. “These guardians don’t care anything about kids,” says Teresa Cummings, who battled with her ex-husband over custody of their two children. “Believe me, they don’t.”

After their divorce, Cummings’ husband decided he wanted custody of their children. The judge appointed a private guardian ad litem, and Cummings’ ex-husband paid the bills. “They got money from the person who has it, which in this case was my ex,” she says.

She can’t quite put her finger on it, but Cummings had the feeling the guardian ad litem was swayed by her ex-husband. “She would say things to me to aggravate me,” Cummings says. She also says she had no idea the guardian was an attorney and didn’t realize who was paying the bills until the case was almost over.

Perhaps Cummings’ fears were overstated, because she ultimately prevailed in the case and kept primary custody of her children. The guardian’s bill was about $5000.

That’s small change compared to a $27,000 bill for guardian ad litem work in the case of Ulbrich v. Ulbrich.

John Ulbrich and Christina Coolidge Ulbrich were already divorced when guardian ad litem Jeffrey Bryer came into their lives. At issue was visitation for Christina’s daughter, Nichole. Though he is neither Nichole’s biological nor adoptive father, John wanted visitation rights with the child. Christina didn’t feel her ex was entitled but gave in to avoid a costly legal battle. The case was settled out of court but not before the guardian ad litem wrote a 55,000-word journal on every aspect of the Ulbrich’s lives and charged John Ulbrich $75 for each of the 365 hours he spent doing it.

“I think he is a frustrated writer,” says John Ulbrich.
And not a very good guardian ad litem to boot, he adds. “It was just an absolute horror, a nightmare. [Bryer] had no ability to gain confidence with my daughter.”

Bryer recommended that John Ulbrich be granted visitation rights and devised a somewhat complicated schedule to that effect. Though he was the one who requested that a guardian ad litem be appointed in the first place, Ulbrich refused to pay what he believed to be a wildly inflated bill. Not that he couldn’t have paid if he wanted — Ulbrich owns a Jaguar dealership on Sunrise Boulevard. Bryer, who did not answer repeated phone calls for this story, settled for $16,500.

And then there’s the granddaddy of all guardian ad litem bills, a $40,000-plus whopper for services rendered in the divorce case of Gumberg v. Gumberg.

Again the pattern: Rich husband pays the bill, less financially endowed wife feels shafted by the system.

The Gumbergs’ divorce case defines contentious — the case file sprawls over 21 volumes. Lorraine Abruzzo Gumberg says her legal bill alone is more than $200,000. She estimates her ex-husband’s bill at close to $800,000, a figure which could not be confirmed because Andrew Gumberg did not return phone calls from New Times.

At the heart of this mess is the custody of a four-year-old boy. The guardian ad litem recommended custody be awarded to the father, with the mother having visitation rights. Not surprisingly, that didn’t sit well with Lorraine Gumberg. “I didn’t stand a chance,” she says. “I lost custody of my child.”

Gumberg says the guardian ad litem criticized her for picayune things, like feeding her son from a bottle though he was 20 months old and letting him sleep in bed with her. The guardian also suggested that, should custody be awarded to the husband, the wife should live close by so the child’s life would not be unduly interrupted. Gumberg scoffs at the notion, noting that her ex-husband, whose worth is put at some $32 million in court records, lives in a $2.5 million waterfront home in Fort Lauderdale. “The idea was that Jordan should not have to go from dad’s beautiful house to mom’s trailer park,” she says. “That’s bullshit.”

Anne Alper, the guardian ad litem in the Gumberg case, was out of town and could not be reached for this story.

In the end Gumberg says her ex-husband got the best legal help money could buy. “I just don’t think the system works right,” she says. “I think the system sucks. He has money. I don’t. That’s the bottom line.”

SatanLawyer

sos11

Who is listening?

What did we do to deserve this?

Where is our advocates?

When will the murders stop?

How are you sleeping at night?


Below is map of most of the murder-suicides

that are plaguing our world.



View Larger Map

CALLING ALL FATHER RIGHTS GROUP….WE’RE STILL KEEPING COUNT…..WHERE IS YOUR STATISTICS THAT WOMEN/MOTHERS KILL MORE THAN MEN/FATHERS? COME ON…..WE KNOW YOU CAN LIE SOME MORE…..JUST ASK MENS DAILY FUCKS

MURDERER

MURDERER

By Jim Staats

Marin Independent Journal

The 27-year-old son of the late pornography king Jim Mitchell was booked into Marin County Jail early Monday on suspicion of beating to death the Novato mother of his 1-year-old daughter.

James Raphael Mitchell, of Pittsburg, was detained late Sunday night in Citrus Heights, near Sacramento, after fleeing with the toddler, triggering a statewide Amber Alert.

James Mitchell is suspected of killing 29-year-old Danielle Keller, a Novato High School graduate who was living with her mother and the couple’s daughter, Samantha Mitchell, on Diablo Court in Novato. Police found Keller dead in the backyard when they responded to a call at 6:53 p.m. Sunday about a possible assault.

Mitchell was located using cell phone technology in Citrus Heights and arrested at 11:59 p.m. Sunday by local police. Samantha was recovered unharmed and was placed with child protective services in Sacramento, according to Novato police Capt. Jim Berg.

“They will most likely contact Marin County child protective services to coordinate the best location for the child,” Berg said.

Mitchell was booked in Marin County Jail at 6:50 a.m. Monday on suspicion of murder, child concealment, violation of court orders and domestic violence, according to police. He was due to be be arraigned in Marin Superior Court at 1:30 p.m. Tuesday. His attorney was reported to be former San Francisco district attorney Terence Hallinan.

Marin County Coroner Kenneth

Holmes said the cause of death was blunt force head trauma. Berg said police have a suspected weapon, though he declined further comment. There have been unconfirmed reports that a baseball bat was used.Keller’s mother, Claudia Stevens, spoke outside her home Monday morning as investigators searched for evidence on the property and yard behind her.

Stevens said she arrived home at about 5 p.m. Sunday after a Giants afternoon baseball game and was playing with Samantha, who was celebrating her first birthday. They had an ice cream cake ready for the young girl and Stevens went to visit some friends at 5:30 p.m. when she received a phone call from neighbors.

“They said I better get back over here right away,” said Stevens, a retired California Highway Patrol officer from Bakersfield. “I asked if Dani was OK and they told me she was dead and Samantha was missing.

“She was such a wonderful mother,” said Stevens of her daughter, who moved in with her six months ago after leaving the Pittsburg home she had shared with Mitchell.

Shaking with emotion as she spoke, Stevens said she saw Samantha on television Monday morning in the arms of a police officer.

“She seemed to be OK,” Stevens said. “She’s such a loving child.”

Stevens said her daughter, who worked in the cosmetics industry, had been interviewing for a new job and was trying to get her life back together after exiting an abusive relationship with Mitchell. She said the two had met two years ago at a club in San Francisco.

San Rafael attorney Charlotte Hideko Huggins represented Keller six months ago, helping her to gain a domestic violence restraining order against Mitchell.

Hideko Huggins said she had just mailed paperwork for a three-year restraining order Friday to Mitchell that he likely received Saturday.

Gina Stahl-Ricco of Novato was a fellow Novato High School graduate with Keller in 1998 who reconnected with “Dani” recently through Novato Mothers Club events.

“She moved back here six months ago to get away from this horrible person,” Stahl-Ricco said. “She always seemed bubbly and happy even though she was going through hard times. She was so committed to Sam. She was trying to get a support system here. She was trying to make a good life for Sam. She knew that’s what it was all about.”

Stahl-Ricco said although Mitchell had been abusive to her, Keller wavered in recent months about going back to him until she caught him doing drugs a month ago.

“She was sympathetic to his cause and would say ‘Oh, I hope he gets some help he’s had a tough past’ and I would tell her it doesn’t matter” and that she should stay away from him because he had allegedly hit her.

She said Keller was constantly having to ignore calls on her cell phone from Mitchell and had become increasingly scared of his recent messages.

“Sadly, it’s like you hear: You have a child together with somebody and you want it to work out and be ideal,” Stahl-Ricco said. “It didn’t seem like he wanted help.”

Hideko Huggins said Sunday was also the two-year anniversary of the death of porn king Jim Mitchell, the suspect’s father.

The elder Mitchell had developed a multimillion-dollar adult-film empire with his younger brother, Artie, and later was convicted of killing Artie in 1991 in Corte Madera. Jim Mitchell died on July 12, 2007 at his ranch near Petaluma at age 63 after serving three years of a six-year sentence for manslaughter in San Quentin State Prison.

Longtime Mitchell family friend Warren Hinckle, a veteran Bay Area author and journalist, said he saw Mitchell on July 5 at a party celebrating the 40th anniversary of the opening of the Mitchell brothers’ O’Farrell Theater. Hinckle said Mitchell had recently been doing well, having worked for a time at his family’s theater and serving in the Marines as a weekend reserve.

“He seemed in good shape to me, but a little tense,” he said. “I’m not sure how well domestic life suited him.”

A donation fund in the name of both Danielle Keller and Samantha Mitchell has been set up at Chase Bank, 1595 Grant Ave. in Novato.

Contact Jim Staats via e-mail at jstaats@marinij.com; IJ reporters Jim Welte and Brent Ainsworth contributed to this report.

EVEN I WOULDN'T FUCK ME

CONFUSION


NEXT THING YOU KNOW MEN WILL WANT YEARLY PAP SMEARS AND MAMMOGRAMS……….yeah right.

I try not to get into the habit of giving any of the father rights idiots anymore attention, but then I think about all the people that need to be educated on the blatant misogyny that Glenn Sacks and his minions bathe in.

In a recent post on Glenn Sacks rag “Mens Daily News” he confesses that,

“I posed as a male victim of domestic violence and called every domestic violence shelter in all of Los Angeles and San Diego counties.”

Isn’t it illegal to prank call?

According to Sacks,

“Not a single one would accept me or offer assistance, with the exception of Valley Oasis. Most flatly refused any assistance at all, but a couple did offer me space in a homeless shelter.” Apparently Sacks cares not for the women that may be stalked there and an ex may pretend he’s abused to gain entrance? All those calls must have put all residents and staff on high alert, how awful to be stressed more.

Mr. Sacks must be confused about a lot of things, mainly his gender. Sacks goes on to say when he asks them “Am I supposed to take my children to a homeless shelter?”

If you TRULY are a abused man allegedly with children and you are escaping an abuser a homeless shelter seems like the safest place to be.

But this is the typical trash from a man that makes you wonder how he treats other women in his life, wife, mother, sister or child?

The world according to these father rights activists is that feminism destroyed their lives.

They want you to believe that men are abused equally if not MORE than women but yet they do NOTHING to get their OWN shelters for the throngs of men who get their ass whipped by their women. Women and men saw a need and they built shelters for women with their children a safe haven from abusers.

The intention was clear, if your men group needs to have some place to go after they get raped by their wives after a night of boozing it up….build a male sexual abuse shelter!

If one of your brethren gets his face shoved into the carpet because he didn’t do ALL the dishes…by all means build that man a place to live.

IF he gets a baby bottle “tossed” at his face (while he’s holding a baby) then I say build a SHELTER! Instead of blaming shelters and everyone else for your problems do something about it!

END YOUR CONFUSION

ballsacks

Q.%20Lazzarus%20-%20bihvharthemesong.MP3

opri

Let it be known that I have had a love/hate relationship with Oprah since I was a child. I am almost 41 years of age but I can say that as a child in Chicago I watched Oprah when she was a lowly reporter on AM Chicago.

Oprah started to have shows that women really cared about and she cared about us. She got us to leave our abusers and that one day when I watched a woman named Susan sit with Oprah and talking about her life of abuse, soon after that show I left my abuser, for good.

So now in this August isssue of “O” magazine there is an article “Why Didn’t They Stop Him?,” by Phoebe Zerwick. It details of how Vernetta Cockerham

“did everything by the book. She took her abusive husband to court. Got a protective order. Reported his violations to the police. Yet in the end, none of that was enough to prevent the worst tragedy she could imagine. Why aren’t the laws against domestic violence enforced?”

Gee…let’s think about this one

Instead of the chastising that women received about the Rhianna case, where Oprah instructed that if “he hits you once he’ll hit again” now we’re getting understanding, finally. Oprah is finally wrapping her head around the concept that it’s easier said than done getting out of an abusive relationship and harder still when children are involved.

As we’ve seen in 2009 with the surge in domestic violence and subsequent murders (murder-suicides)

The most dangerous time for a woman is when she leaves her abuser.

Abusers make it hard for you to leave and when and if you do they really make your life hell. I lost my job because my ex vandalized my vehicle not to mention the other economic, social and other forms of control. The most important factor in leaving an abuser is having family, friends and government to be your support system, that doesn’t usually happen.

Family and friends will shy away from an abused woman…not wanting to get involved and the government will ignore you and usually fail to protect you.

NOT to mention what they do to you in Family Court.

I am a lucky one because I am literally a survivor. I saw the future if I stayed and I saw death, his or mine and I was sure it wasn’t going to be mine.

So thank you once again Oprah for shedding a light on the dirty secrets of domestic violence….we could have done it without you….mostly.

Although we survivors have learned, the hard way, that we won’t get the help we need or deserve so we’ll have to do it ourselves as with leaving an abuser and don’t expect any Oprah’s on white horses to save you….save yourself first.

http://www.oprah.com/article/omagazine/200908-omag-domestic-violence

British scientists grow sperm in laboratory

GUESS SOMEONE JUST GOT DOWNSIZED

SPERM

Women who say they don’t need a man may well be right – after human sperm was created in the lab.

I already know what is going to be said, I hate men and that is a lie, because there is one in particular I love very much. He is the man that I wished I could of made a father because he is the one that very much deserved to be one.

Still….I can’t help but wonder what it would be like if you took out the factor of the one thing allegedly women only want men for and the one thing that they are good at (impregnating their sperm). This could be an end of child support! This could be the start of something beautiful…..

Discrimination and abuse wrongly backed by doctrine are damaging society, argues the former US president

by Jimmy Carter

“Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status …” (Article 2, Universal Declaration of Human Rights)“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)I have been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world.

So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when th e convention’s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be “subservient” to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service. This was in conflict with my belief – confirmed in the holy scriptures – that we are all equal in the eyes of God.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. It is widespread. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths.

Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women’s equal rights across the world for centuries. The male interpretations of religious texts and the way they interact with, and reinforce, traditional practices justify some of the most pervasive, persistent, flagrant and damaging examples of human rights abuses.

At their most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in Britain and the United States. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for everyone in society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and out-dated attitudes and practices – as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive area to challenge.

But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy – and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights. We have recently published a statement that declares: “The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable.”

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world’s major faiths share.

Although not having training in religion or theology, I understand that the carefully selected verses found in the holy scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place – and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence – than eternal truths. Similar Biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

At the same time, I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn’t until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted holy scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

I know, too, that Billy Graham, one of the most widely respected and revered Christians during my lifetime, did not understand why women were prevented from being priests and preachers. He said: “Women preach all over the world. It doesn’t bother me from my study of the scriptures.”

The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter.

Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

• Jimmy Carter was US president from 1977-81. The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity.

SHARLONA

Jealousy,

threats of violence part of Fort Lewis gunman’s

history

The man who fatally shot his ex-girlfriend before killing himself at Fort Lewis on Wednesday had previously threatened his former wife, according to court records.

By Christine Clarridge

Seattle Times staff reporter

The tipping point for the 59-year-old retired soldier who killed his former girlfriend at Fort Lewis before turning the gun on himself seemed to come when he learned she was dating another man, the victim’s family said.

Lafayette Meminger found out that Sharlona White, 33, had reunited with her high-school boyfriend and that the new man was moving to Washington state, White’s daughter said on Thursday.

“He told her that if he couldn’t have her, no one could,” said 14-year-old Zeunna Woodruff.

According to law-enforcement and Army officials, Meminger walked into the crowded main post exchange at Fort Lewis and fatally shot White at around 11:20 a.m. Wednesday. He then shot himself in the head, and he died a few hours later.

Meminger, of Lakewood, Pierce County, had retired from the Army as a sergeant first class in 1992. White was a civilian vendor, according to the Army.

The FBI, which is investigating the murder-suicide because both Meminger and White were civilians who died on a federal installation, did not release new information on Thursday.

According to court records and White’s family, jealous rage was not unusual for Meminger.

His former wife had sought an order of protection from him from a Pierce County Superior Court judge in November 2002. In her request, she stated that she had divorced Meminger in 1999 after 30 years of marriage.

“He did not bother me until one month ago when he found out that I am dating,” she stated in court documents.

Since that time, she wrote, he had staked out her apartment, left dirty and threatening messages on her voice mail and threatened to kill her boyfriend.

He had told relatives and friends that he planned to get a gun, go to the firing range and then “take me out,” she wrote.

“I think he is consumed by jealousy,” she stated. “He says a restraining order won’t stop him, that it’s just a piece of paper.”

The former wife also said Meminger had been arrested for stalking and harassing her in 1994. “He was dangerous then and I feel he is even more dangerous now,” she wrote.

The protection order was granted.

White, an East St. Louis, Mo., native who loved fashion and design ever since she was a child, moved to Washington before her children were born. She was working at a kiosk at the post exchange, or PX, selling clothing and jewelry of her own design.

She also ran a small clothing store in University Place that she’d named “ZnZ Wear” after her daughter and her 10-year-old son, Zaron.

Meminger was working as an unarmed guard at Western State Hospital.

Woodruff said her mother, a devoted Christian, had been introduced to Meminger about 18 months ago through a woman in her church.

“He was really good to us at first. He cooked and cleaned and said he would never hurt my mother, but then he tried to strangle her,” Woodruff said.

When that happened, about eight months ago, White broke up with Meminger, her family said.

“He became crazily obsessed, worse than in the movies,” Woodruff said. “He was coming around the house all the time, banging on the doors, banging on the windows. He would send crazy text messages to her and show up at her work all the time.”

About a week before she was killed, White and her two children had taken shelter at the Tacoma home of White’s parents. The night before her death, she had bought a dog for protection, her daughter said.

Her family urged her to get a restraining order, said her mother, Rose Braggs, but White didn’t believe that would help.

Meminger’s ex-wife couldn’t be reached Thursday. But the couple’s son said his family’s thoughts and condolences are with White’s family.

Maurice Meminger said his father had been a “good man and an awesome father.”

Nevertheless, “his actions don’t reflect our family,” he said.

The_shining_heres_johnny

FACTS

MALES KILL MORE OFTEN THAN FEMALES…..

MALES ABUSE MORE OFTEN THAN FEMALES….

MURDER-SUICIDE, ABUSE OR ANY OTHER VIOLENT CRIME IS MORE OFTEN A MALE

I CHALLENGED ANY ONE TO PROVE ME WRONG…THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING….BUT I AM NOT QUIET

NEITHER IS USA TODAY WHO REPORTS THAT THE ECONOMY IS NOT THE ONLY REASON FOR THE HIGH VOLUMES OF MURDERS, SUICIDES, VIOLENCE AND FAMILICIDES.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-02-04-family_N.htm

Wendy Koch of USA TODAY reports that the economy has been blamed for a lot and that financial problems can be a factor but the scholars do suggest that the crime of “familicide” is rare.

“The economic downturn is not triggering a rash of this,” says Louis Schlesinger, professor of forensic psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Hundreds of thousands have been laid off recently, he notes, and more have lost money in the stock market, without killing their families.”

Since October, at least three men who lost jobs or money, two in California and one in Pennsylvania, killed themselves and their families.

The people who commit such crimes are almost always men, Schlesinger says.

“They honestly believe their family is better off dead than without them,” says Kristen Rand of the Violence Policy Center, a gun-control research group.

Her group has done three studies on slayings followed by suicide, but most did not involve the deaths of an entire family. In the first half of 2007, the most recent study found, murder-suicides caused 554 deaths, including 45 children under 18. Firearms were used in nine out of 10 cases.

Most murder-suicides, 78.5%, are caused by problems between intimate partners, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A CDC report, using 2005 data from 16 states, found that financial problems were a factor in 8% of the 199 deaths studied.

Family slayings are usually one of two types, says Phillip Resnick, psychiatry professor at Case Western Reserve University. Some involve men who are angry at partners, who may have been unfaithful or want to leave the relationship, he says. Others involve men who lose their jobs or savings and, if they are vulnerable to depression, become hopeless or psychotic.

“There is a relationship (to finances), particularly when a man loses his job,” he says.

“It’s a combination of factors,” says Sampson Blair, a sociology professor at the University of Buffalo in New York. He says suicide, spouse-battering and child abuse increase slightly in bad times.

“It’s not the economic conditions per se but the stress created,” Blair says. “The sense of desperation pushes them right off the edge.”

He says that when people lose their jobs, they are at least twice as likely to commit suicide.

“Familicide is different,” Schlesinger argues. “Most people don’t kill their families when they lose their jobs.”

He says no one should expect family killings to increase in an economic downturn.

Schlesinger says it’s difficult to explain such horrific events. The killer doesn’t live to answer questions, so unless he leaves a suicide note, the reason may be unknown.

In Spring Garden Township, Pa., John Goodman, 39, left no note before killing his wife, their 2-year-old son and himself in November. He had lost his job of six years in August.

Police don’t know why he acted, but his job loss may have been a “stressor,” says Police Chief George Swartz.

In Whitehall, Ohio, last week, Mark Meeks, 51, killed himself, his wife and two children. He left a note but police won’t reveal its contents.

Detective Steven Brown says “financial problems were not a factor.” Meeks had just been hired at a car dealership.

Also last week, Ervin Lupoe, 40, killed himself, his wife, 8-year-old daughter, 5-year-old twin girls and 2-year-old twin boys in Wilmington, Calif. He and his wife had both lost their jobs.

HE WON'T BE BACK

HE WON'T BE BACK Gov. Schwarzenegger Cut 100% of Domestic Violence Funding and What Californians Can Do About It

Please look at WHO is getting the grants, and look at the bar chart below — in 2009, suddenly, it’s Zero.” (OR data not in yet?). . . .

I know some of these groups. Others I don’t.  They’re doing training and web-based webinars, conferences, etc.

They are not STREET-level help, and this is the bulk of the funding, too:

Here’s who got the money in CA in 2008:

ASIAN-AMERICAN HEALTH FORUM California $400,000 1831831360
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS California $75,000 005138644
FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION FUND California $1,323,812 6183756870

in 2007:

CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS California $75,000 005138644
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELESDIV OF ADOLES M California $75,000 52277936 0
EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION California $95,648 084516632
FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION FUND California $1,394,127 6183756870
SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS INC California $75,000 1134077790

(2006 — no one; 2005):

Now look at 93.591.  It’s going straight to the COALITIONS, one/state.  Even though the title includes the word “grants to battered women’s shelters,” I don’t think the money ever gets to these shelters through these grants.

California Alliance Against Domestic Violence (WHO?)

The Feds are instead sending money DIRECTLY to the State Coalitions Against Domestic Violence, under the new “grant” program # 93.591, which contains the words “Grants to Battered Women’s Shelters” IN it, but the money is not going to probably go to shelters.  It is going to web-based trainings such as the ones we were looking at by the Battered Women’s Justice Centers.  It is getting centralized and streamlined.

this category “93.591″ only came into being in 2008.

93l.592 is also for shelters, and we should ask EVERY recipient what they did with their money.

FVPF, a group that (I heard) is majorly responsible for the VAWA passing to start with, has had a real injection of federal funding (including under 93.592, which is SHELTERS, but it’s a high-class conference and training initiative.

STEPMONSTER KELA PRICE

STEPMONSTER KELA PRICE

Wow, I couldn’t believe this until I saw it myself.  Indianapolis “stepfamily counselor” Kela Price published something I find quite astonishing for someone who claims she is for children.  Here is her bio from the Examiner, where she recently posted an article titled “Children speak up about relationships with their fathers post divorce“:

Kela Price has been an ex/second wife, mom/stepmom for over 8 yrs. As Founder of www.blendedfamilysoapopera.com and a Certified Stepfamily Counselor, she is well-versed when it comes to divorce and remarriage issues. Kela can be reached at kela@blendedfamilysoapopera.com.

Second wives are often recruited to the Father’s Rights movement, to show they have women on board with them and give them more credibility.  Often though, after several years, the FR groups will throw them away when they have lost their usefulness.  They are easy recruits…they see what their current husbands deal with their exwives and the children.

Kela recently published an article on her local blog called “Blended family karma – what goes around always comes back around.”

Read what Kela gets miffed over:

Two weeks ago my husband went to visit his son (he lives 3 hours way). Two weeks prior to that, he informed his ex-wife that he was coming to see him play in his baseball game. She responded by giving him directions and the phone number to the facility just in case he got lost.

Gee, sounds pretty nice of her to do that, I know a lot of custodial fathers who would not do that, much less even let the moms see their own kids.

When he got there the game was being cancelled due to rain, so he told his son (K) that he’d take him out to dinner instead.  K was excited and ran to tell his mom that he was going out to dinner with my husband and she said no because they had plans. My husband told her that they couldn’t have plans because they had planned to be at the baseball game but it was cancelled. He took him to dinner anyway and returned him to her home 2 hours later.

That is pretty crappy, they had plans and her husband took him anyway….oh well.  Life goes on, dad had dinner with son.  This is where it gets nasty…the very next paragraph, still carrying on about the same event:

At nine months pregnant she was still up to her old game of “keep away.” I couldn’t believe that she had the energy or even the desire to do so. There was absolutely no reason why she shouldn’t have agreed to let him go. Did she really expect my husband to drive 3 hours to see his son for 5 minutes and then leave? Surely not.  My husband came home really upset; mainly because of the position that she put K in. He didn’t want to argue with her in front of K, but he also didn’t want to turn around after driving 3 hours and not spend any time with his son. It was a tough decision and he didn’t understand why he had to be in that position in the first place.  He was tired and completely frustrated with the situation and we all have been for quite some time now. Two days later, while walking our dog, my husband received a phone call from a very emotional K saying that his mother LOST THE BABY! She was 36 weeks pregnant, went into the hospital for spotting and the doctors told her that the baby had no heartbeat. The universe is shifting!

It is no coincidence that the same woman who snatched my husband’s son away from him after years of developing a close bond and wonderful relationship with him and for no reason at all, had her baby snatched away as well. Hopefully now she and her husband truly understand what it feels like to love, prepare for, bond with and sacrifice so much for a child, only to have him snatched away for reasons that can’t be explained…

Well, I don’t have the words now for this “certified” counselor.  Telling a mom she deserves to have her baby die is very wicked.  I hope that Indianapolis people become aware of this so-called “counselor” and how she really feels about children.  Who in the hell certified her?  They need to know about this!  I believe she may need some heavy-duty counseling for herself and her own twisted issues.  Kela Price puts the monster into Stepmonster…

blended

To the mom who lost her baby, my condolences to you dear.

COMMENTS FROM ORIGINAL BLOG POST ON

http://mothersoflostchildren.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/local-stepfamily-counselor-celebrates-babys-death/

  1. It’s too bad that you are basing your judgement on something that you have no knowledge of. I wish you knew our entire story before publishing this post, but we all speak from our respective pain. I’m sorry about what you have experienced that has caused you to write this vicious post about someone you do not know, but you are certainly free to have your own opinion; even if it’s without substance. Go back and re-read the post. It is not a celebration of a baby’s death. As a matter of fact, I expressed my sympathy for the ex-wife, despite what she’s done to my family. It is about a life lesson! I’ll pray for you.

    Peace and Blessings,

    Kela Price
    Certified Stepfamily Counselor (who has helped MANY with the challenges of stepfamily life.

    Kela

    July 31, 2009 at 10:16 pm

  2. This is disgusting and thank you for finding this.

    Exposethetruth

    August 1, 2009 at 2:11 am

  3. Wow Kela, your idea of a life lesson is pretty icky.

    mothersoflostchildren

    August 1, 2009 at 2:20 am

  4. It is said that true understanding comes only from a person who has experienced a similar event. I could wish that this-”Kela”? experience this kind of learning.
    Apart from that-many humans have a sense of empathy- that enables them to appreciate another’s situation-even if they have not had a similar experience. Those that don’t- have a serious lack. Even animals of different species have been seen playing together and helping each other.Animals of the same species often help each other.Only predators attack a vulnerable- – — -. What an atrocious example of a human-an example of the worst kind.

    Cold North Wind

    August 1, 2009 at 3:22 am

  5. Just re-read a comment by- the-one-who-has-no-empathy. A life lesson? So- if you get cancer- it will only be a life lesson-for the text you published. Pray for -the blog writer ? Somehow that is an insult of the lowest kind. Perhaps I should pray for you to have a life lesson.

    Cold North Wind

    August 1, 2009 at 3:26 am

  6. Just sad and so typical for a wanna be mother aka stepmonster. I am so glad tonight I was at a place where there were moms, stepmoms, stepdads, and none of them disagreed. They at least can be grownup UNLIKE this wanna be.

    Mz. Petunia Pigg

    August 2, 2009 at 3:18 am

  7. Oh and Kela, we know YOUR side of the story. What is MOM’s side of the story? Truth is probably somewhere in between. And who knows whose side it is closer to, but reading some of your monster rants, I think she is probably telling more truth.

    But that again is just MY opinion in dealing with hundreds of stepMONSTERS through my blog.

    Mz. Petunia Pigg

    August 2, 2009 at 3:19 am

  8. …I hope mothers like you don’t ever get your children back. Oh and before I get a bunch of angry emails, the email address isn’t real. I don’t wish to engage in a bunch of childlike behavior that so many ex-wives wish to do. We “stepmonsters” are just trying to raise children…

    Kela, Kela, Kela. You do need help. Get checked for multiple personality syndrome. Your credibility isn’t looking so hot. Of course the e-mail isn’t real…you went to gmail and made a fake account, then posted the comment from your computer. These are your words posted here, expressing some type of twisted joy over a baby dying. You really are certified…

    Candace’s IP: Author Candace (IP: 70.236.4.32 , ppp-70-236-4-32.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net)

    Kela’s IP: Author Kela (IP: 70.236.4.32 , ppp-70-236-4-32.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net)

    Candace

    August 2, 2009 at 12:23 pm

  9. …You are the monsters and like Candace said….

    ROFLMAO!!! Kela, you need to wait before the fake comment is posted before commenting on it….LOL. Really, check into that multiple personality thing, and maybe ask about getting a special on anger management classes…

    Author : Kela (IP: 70.236.4.32 , ppp-70-236-4-32.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net)

    Author : Candace (IP: 70.236.4.32 , ppp-70-236-4-32.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net)

    Author : Arielle (IP: 70.236.4.32 , ppp-70-236-4-32.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net)

    Arielle

    August 2, 2009 at 12:45 pm

  10. Oh my, Kela that’s not very nice coming from someone who is “qualified”. It seems like your true personality has been revealed over and over.
    I feel so sorry for any children in your care, step and biological.
    How did you find this blog anyway, googling your name daily?

    Exposethetruth

    August 2, 2009 at 9:20 pm

  11. Hello,

    Those comments were made from a friend and family member who were at my house and against my wishes. I apologize on their behalf. I’m sorry you ladies feel this way, but let’s just agree to disagree and move on.

    Sincerely,

    *Kela*

    Kela

    August 2, 2009 at 9:26 pm

  12. Not nice at all…you think that by saying that somehow this woman has lost her baby is karma? The universe is shifting…you should be aware of what you say…and put in PRINT.

    mamaliberty

    August 2, 2009 at 10:49 pm

  13. You are SO outed!! LOL….

    mamaliberty

    August 2, 2009 at 11:00 pm

  14. Bullshit! Kela apart from being a witch, you are also a liar!

    Exposethetruth

    August 2, 2009 at 11:08 pm

heman

Glenn Sacks, Ned Holstein, Dr. Richard Gardner, Warren Farrell…just to name a few….are all a part of a group of men who insist that poor little them get discriminated against, abused and women are just downright mean to them….poor little fellas.  :(    

Right Spanky?

The best part of their little club is that not all MEN feel as they do. They know  the reality IS that woman are abused more often than men….AND men do have many more advantages than that of a women.

Another former member of this group is George Sodini. George seethed with anger and frustration toward women. He couldn’t understand why they ignored him, despite his best efforts to look nice. He hadn’t had a girlfriend since 1984, hadn’t slept with a woman in 19 years.

“Women just don’t like me. There are 30 million desirable women in the US (my estimate) and I cannot find one. Not one of them finds me attractive,” the 48-year-old computer programmer lamented in a chilling diary he posted on the Internet.

For months, he also wrote vaguely about using guns to carry out his “exit plan” at his health club, where lots of young women worked out.

Yesterday his plan was executed.

He went to the sprawling L.A. Fitness Club in this Pittsburgh suburb, turned out the lights on a dance-aerobics class filled with women, and opened fire with three guns, letting loose with a fusillade of at least 36 bullets.

He killed three women and wounded nine others before committing suicide.

“He just had a lot of hatred in him and (was) hell-bent on committing this act, and no one was going to stop him,” Allegheny County Police Superintendent Charles Moffatt said Wednesday.

The 4,610-word Web diary appeared to be a nine-month chronology of his plans to end his misery with a shocking act of carnage at the health club. He portrayed himself as painfully and inexplicably lonely.

“Every evening I am alone, and then go to bed alone,” he wrote. “I see twenty something couples everywhere. I see a twenty something guy with a nice twentyish young women. I think those years slipped right by for me. Why should I continue another 20+ years alone?”

It was unclear when the Web diary was posted and whether it had been updated online repeatedly since November or posted in its entirety recently. Moffatt said investigators are trying to determine whether anyone saw it online before the rampage.

“If anyone knew of it, they would have a moral and ethical obligation and legal obligation to bring it forward,” the police superintendent said.

Killed were Heidi Overmier, 46, of Carnegie, a sales manager at an amusement park; Jody Billingsley, 37, of Mount Lebanon, who worked for a medical-supply company; and Elizabeth Gannon, 49, of Pittsburgh, an X-ray technician at Allegheny General Hospital.

“She can’t be gone,” said Gannon’s next-door neighbor and close friend, Carl Rady, who knew her for 35 years and said she loved to work out and pamper her dog. “It can’t happen that way.”

Sodini was a member of the health club and had been there two times Tuesday before he came back at night, police said. He did not have a relationship with any of his victims, according to police.

In his Web diary, Sodini wrote of planning the attack since at least November and said he tried to carry it out when the same Tuesday-night aerobics class met on Jan. 6. “I cannot wait for tomorrow!” he exulted the night before. But he backed out at the last moment.

“It is 8:45PM: I chickened out!” he wrote. “I brought the loaded guns, everything. Hell!”

In his diary, he complained that women “don’t even give me a second look ANYWHERE” even though he was tan and fit and claimed to dress well and smell nice. He listed his status as “Never married.” In a chilling addition, he recorded the date of his death as Aug. 4, 2009.

On that evening, he walked into the health club wearing black workout gear and a headband, and entered the “Latin impact” class with four guns.

Jordan Solomon, 14, said she thought it was weird when a man walked into the all-female class and put a black duffel bag on the ground and reached into it.

“All of a sudden all the lights went out and I turned around, he started firing. I turned around and I saw him holding a gun,” she said.

Solomon said the man was expressionless, and she didn’t hear him say anything as he sprayed bullets. The teenager ran out of the room and into the parking lot, bolting into a restaurant where she told the workers to call 911.

Lauren Dooley, 27, who was exercising on a treadmill on the second floor, ran down the fire escape and out the rear of the building, where bystanders were applying pressure to victims’ gunshot wounds.

“You just feel like you’re in a movie … a horrible movie where someone comes in and unleashes fire on everyone. You just don’t know what to do,” Dooley said.

She returned to the gym Wednesday morning to retrieve her purse and cell phone, but the doors were locked. A sign read: “Each of us in the LA Fitness family are shocked and saddened by the senseless acts of violence that took place at our Bridgeville club Tuesday evening.”

Sodini did not have a criminal record, and he legally bought the guns he used, police said. Sodini used his cell phone a few minutes before the shooting, but Moffatt would not say whom he called.

Sodini’s family issued a brief statement: “Our hearts and prayers are with the victims and their families and we pray for the full recovery of the survivors.”

Six patients remained hospitalized, including the aerobics instructor, Mary Primis, 26, who was listed in fair condition. Primis is pregnant but said doctors told her the baby is fine.

Authorities initially had difficulty identifying the victims because they had workout clothes on and weren’t carrying wallets.

Sodini graduated in 1992 from the University of Pittsburgh with a degree in computer science and had worked as a systems analyst at a Pittsburgh law firm since 1999.

A neighbor, Connie Fontanesi, said Sodini was so anti-social that “we really didn’t learn anything personal about him.”

Roberta Kozel, co-owner of Salon IAOMO, said Sodini was a regular at the tanning salon and last visited on Saturday.

The best line of all….“He was just pretty normal, a little quiet — like the classroom nerd,” Kozel said.

My predication from the He-Man Woman Haters Club? I’m sure they will blame women for not wanting to be with this psychopath….guess women saw more than a nerd.


Rest In Peace HEIDI, JODY and ELIZABETH

Copy of 3Angels

listen

Two little girls ages 5 and 8 have literally had their lives turned upside down in the last 87 hours since their mother Suzan Annette Sowlers-Fuller and Grandmother Sharon Sue Cannon were killed, before their eyes.
The very system that was supposed to protect their mother and grandmother likely aided in their murders when they failed to upgrade the case and properly charge the estranged husband.
In those 87 hours the girls have lost their in what I refer to as their “country.” A place where they each learned to ride their first horse. Where the girls learned how to roller skate down the drive-way, they each played their first game of hopscotch. At night their mom would read them a bedtime story, they would say their prayers and then Suzan or Annette as she liked to be called would kiss her daughters goodnight.
In a matter of moments, gone. They can never return, because, their warm safe world, has vanished. Since Saturday they have been whisked from strange beds, to people with badges to interviews with forensic investigators, appearances in court and questions from strangers who are unable to tell the girls why their mommy is dead.
The order of protection is a document to track the abuse, nothing more. Leading experts are commenting that these cases do not often end in murder when a victim obtains a court order. Well perhaps those experts need to examine these cases a bit closer. Many women do not obtain a court order for fear of being killed. A woman for numerous reasons decides on various factors usually not disclosed to others that prevents her from seeking assistance. It is more of a damn if you do and damn if you do not decision on the part of each victim.
On The Susan Murphy Milano show, we will discuss the various obstacles highlighting this tragedy in hopes that those listening will learn what direction they need to take when faced with imminent danger. This is also a case of “maternal deprivation abuse” that ended in murder. Simply, the father and killer hijacked the children from their mother. We will be joined on the show by Claudine Dombrowski a leading expert in the area of motherswithout custody. And a we will be joined by a close relative and friend who was in daily contact with both women who died.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/SusanMurphyMilano/2009/08/12/The-Susan-Murphy-Milano-Show

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,540388,00.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a16:g2:r5:c0.076968:b27221128:z0

dasilva

A former choreographer for “So You Think You Can Dance” was arrested again for allegedly sexually assaulting four women — but this time he’s actually being charged with a crime … or eight, to be exact.Cops say Alex Da Silva was arrested this morning at his North Hollywood home, after the District Attorney filed an arrest warrant charging him with eight felony counts of assault.

That includes four counts of forcible rape, two counts of assault with intent to commit rape and two counts of sexual penetration by a foreign object.

The D.A. says the alleged assaults occurred between August 2002 and March 2009. The four alleged victims were between the ages of 20 and 26 and were all dancers or aspiring dancers who say they met Alex through his dance instruction classes.

Alex was arrested for pretty much the same thing back in April, but prosecutors declined to press charges — saying further investigation was needed to move forward.

Alex is being held on $6.2 million bail.

Judge_Dredd_GEN_ScreenShot1

Convicted former Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge Gerald P. Garson has been granted parole, 25 months after he began serving a 3 to 10-year prison term for bribery and receiving rewards for official misconduct.

Garson, 77,  had been convicted in April 2007 of fixing divorce cases and accepting a box of Dominican cigars worth $250 and $1,000 in cash.  He had turned down a plea deal in October 2006 that would have given him 16 months in jail in exchange for a guilty plea to bribery charges.

Garson’s release has been sent for Dec. 23 by the state Parole Board.  The board has stipulated that following his release, he is prohibited from being affiliated with any law firm.  Garson has been disbarred due to his felony convictions.  He is also required to participate in an alcohol abuse treatment program and to submit to substance abuse testing.

Garson had gotten a 12-day reprieve on reporting to prison in June 2007 so that he could “dry out”.  He has been in state prison since July 7, 2007.

Garson, former leader of the Brooklyn Democratic Party, had argued that his bladder cancer, heart condition as well as admitted severe alcoholism would likely result in his death should he be incarcerated.

Garson’s release was “strongly opposed” by the Kings County district attorney’s office.

Michael F. Vecchione, chief of the district attorney’s Rackets Division who was the lead prosecutor at Garson’s trial said “This was an overwhelming case of greed, of him selling his office for drinks, lunches, dinners and gifts and a violation of the trust voters and citizens of Brooklyn placed in him”.

the-grudge3

WARNING

THIS SHIT IS ABOUT TO GET

PERSONAL

In the coming days this blog is about to get really personal. We will not only continue to report the truth about Family Court we are going to name names.

That’s right….all you criminals of the organized crime system a.k.a Family Court….shit is hitting the proverbial fan.

We have reported the blood money trail from Responsible Fatherhood Intiatives and we have followed the scum of neo-natzi skinheads that are trying to pawn themselves off as human. Now we will report for every mother and child that have been silenced by you. We will be their voice.

Oh and by the way….to the child protection worker who said that just because a child was in a car driven by their drunk father didn’t make him a “bad father he made a bad choice”….your wrong sweetie…and you’re going to be first, everything personal.

child_gun

Posted previously by RightsForMothers.com

Another custodial father allegedly killed by child because of ongoing abuse…again.  As the rant by father’s groups and “shared parenting” groups continue, and abusive fathers get custody more and more, we will see these incidents increase.  This is, because in the eyes of some of these groups, an abusive father is better than no father at all.  I bet this little boy thought differently.

Why in the world would an abusive father have custody of children?  Because, when they try for custody, they get it 70% of the time.   Research has shown that these fathers who abused the mother will start abusing the children 40-60% of the time, if they hadn’t been already.

The Children, Youth and Families Department had SEVEN reports of abuse in the household, and did NOTHING.

And AGAIN…neighbors are quoted as saying what a nice guy this was…geezzzz.  Who could ever believe a father would abuse a child…not many men’s rights advocates I know which I won’t name.

Someone needs to take charge here and stop abusive parents from getting custody of children and to have abuse allegations taken seriously.  Child protective service’s agencies are a JOKE, and will excuse any reports of abuse if it is in the context of custody disputes.   For more on this, see:

I’m as Mad as Hell, and I’m Not Going to Take This Anymore

How many more children will be put in this position of “him or me” in determining survival?  How many children will not be able to take one more beating, or one more rape, and then break?

From the Digital Journal:

Boy, 10, could face murder charges in death of his father

Published 3 hours ago by Chris Dade

A 10-year-old boy from Belen, New Mexico is facing a possible charge of first-degree murder after his 42-year-old father died from a wound to the head, allegedly inflicted by his son.

According to ABC News, which in turn quotes a report by KOAT-TV, a boy allegedly used his own gun to shoot his father. Police were then called to the home of Byron Hilburn last Thursday evening, where they found him dead with a head wound.

Police believe the boy’s 6-year-old sister witnessed the shooting.

Hilburn was eventually pronounced dead at the University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque.

The motive for the killing is apparently that the dead man, divorced and with custody of his three children, disciplined his son too harshly and too frequently, according to the boy. As the London Times reports, the man’s third child, a 9-year-old boy, was on a visit to other members of his family when the shooting occurred.

Police have reportedly not ruled out the possibility the shooting was an accident; the London Times says that the boy, who will be appointed a legal guardian prior to any police interviews, cannot be charged with murder without the approval of the New Mexico juvenile probation department.

The boy’s younger sister is now being cared for by family members, as their mother’s whereabouts and her involvement in their lives’ has not been made clear. The 10-year-old himself is in the custody of the New Mexico’s Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD). And the CYFD has confirmed that since 2003 it has received seven anonymous calls alleging child abuse and neglect within the victim’s household. But its inquiries into the welfare of the children have not produced sufficient evidence to warrant removing the three children from the household.

Neighbors of the family reported nothing untoward in their experience of them, with descriptions such as “a good family” and “the kind of family you’d like to live next to” being used.

If the boy is eventually charged with his father’s murder, there are expected to be protests from human rights groups, among them Amnesty International. The London-based organization has been critical in the past of the record of the U.S. with regard to the human rights of children.  (YES, YES, YES)

Personally, I just signed up my child for gun safety and shooting…

WATCH OUT DADDY

I learned from the best on how to abuse and now my aim is getting better!

shooting-gun-safety-meter-slogan-close-e8611

im_wheel

For many abused women the above “wheel of abuse” will be familiar although changes have been made to reflect that the abuse that some women have endured is continued in the Family Court system. The statistics are nauseating, the American Psychological Association’s Presidential Task Force on Violence in the Family, the leading review of the research as of 1996, found that men who abuse their partners contest custody at least twice as often as non-abusing fathers. Makes you wonder what the statistics would tell for 2009. (American Psychological Association Presidential Task on Violence in the Family, 1996 at p. 40. )

The Family Court system is not set up to resolve “high conflict” divorces/custody disputes, they are set up to instigate, aggravate and allow your abuser to continue the circle of abuse all in the name of greed and professional gains.  All figures in the Family Court system profit in some form or another (legally and illegally) and everyday women and children are placed at risk by abusive men.

As we’ve seen in the Judge Garson case in New York, where he accepted bribes by his favorite court appointed Guardian Ad Litem.  According to Michael F. Vecchione, chief of the district attorney’s Rackets Division and also lead prosecutor at Garson’s trial said, “This was an overwhelming case of greed, of him selling his office for drinks, lunches, dinners and gifts and a violation of the trust voters and citizens of Brooklyn placed in him”. Judge Garson is not an isolated incident this happens everyday in Family Court.  In order for change to begin then we must make these elected officials accountable and expose the dirty little secrets of the Family Court, this is the mission of many. Action is needed as we speak to expose the greed and corruption.  As anyone who has faced abused, survived, moved on and empowered yourself we will also stand up to our abuser, Family Court and say, ENOUGH!


Domestic violence ad2

Note: Cross posted from [wp ridezstormz] Silent No More!.

“Domestic violence is about control, not anger. Once a victim says ‘I’m leaving you,’ the last thing the batterer has over the victim is the children“.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-familyviolence_27met.ART0.North.Edition1.3e56364.html

Advocates of domestic violence victims say a growing number of batterers are using the tactic in court to gain custody of their children.

“In cases where domestic violence is alleged, the perpetrator’s attorney can put in this alleged parental alienation syndrome,” said Dallas psychologist Jane Toler, who will give a presentation on the issue at the conference. “Then, all of a sudden, it takes the focus off the perpetrator and puts it back onto the victim.”

Dr. Toler, who has a private practice and also works for The Family Place for victims of domestic abuse, said lack of awareness about the complex concept can lead to a violent parent gaining custody. That can raise questions about the safety of the children involved, she said.

The one-day family violence conference also will include presentations about women who use violence, elder abuse, the clergy’s response to victims, and domestic violence in the gay community. The keynote speaker is Carolyn Thomas, a Waco woman whose ex-boyfriend shot her in the face and caused extensive injuries in December 2003.

The conference, which is expected to draw about 200 people, is sponsored by the Dallas County district attorney’s office and the Dallas County Domestic Violence Awareness, Child Abuse Awareness and Elder Abuse coalitions.

Parental alienation syndrome recently has become a leading defense in custody cases – and a controversial topic among family violence experts.

Casey Alexander, president of Texas Fathers for Equal Rights in Fort Worth, said the defense should not be discounted.

“I tend to believe there are far more cases of legitimate alienation than there are guys beating their wives who are using this to get their children,” Mr. Alexander said, adding that he experienced parental alienation syndrome during his divorce.

Paige Flink, executive director of The Family Place, said parental alienation syndrome has increasingly been used against her clients.

“A lot of it is rooted in blaming the victim,” she said. “We’ve seen the judges taking the kids from the mother and giving them to the abuser.”

State law prohibits family court judges from awarding full or joint custody to an abusive parent if there is a finding of family violence. However, advocates say such evidence is not always presented in court, sometimes because the victim cannot afford legal representation.

Some abusers have gone so far as to accuse victims of domestic violence of going to a shelter just to keep the children away from them, said Katie Foster, regional training coordinator for the family violence division of the Dallas County district attorney’s office.

“Domestic violence is about control, not anger. Once a victim says ‘I’m leaving you,’ the last thing the batterer has over the victim is the children,” she said.

The division also conducted training on the issue in February, Ms. Foster said.

“There is a need for more awareness about this issue. There’s a need for more education about it,” she said.

rotten-apple-thumb11

http://justice4mothers.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/fatherhood-initiative-bill-senator-evan-bayh-d-in-is-not-his-fathers-son/

This is from the Indiana Mothers For Custodial Justice, covering the recently introduced Fatherhood Initiative Bill:

Evan Bayh is Not His Father’s Son

I heard this comment in a meeting yesterday, and how true it is. ” Evan Bayh is not his father’s son.”

In Birch Bayh’s eyes, women should be given the same chances that men have.  Women deserved equality and this was evident in his legislation.

‘Father’ Of Title IX Honored

By Richard Veilleux

Former U.S. Sen. Birch Bayh of Indiana, considered the “father” of Title IX, the landmark federal legislation created more than 30 years ago that greatly expanded educational and athletics opportunities for girls and women, was honored during half-time of the women’s basketball game between UConn and Rutgers on Martin Luther King Day.

Image: Former U.S. Senator Birch Bayh
Former U.S. Senator
Birch Bayh

“Thanks to Title IX, women have taken their rightful place in American education – as students, teachers, administrators, and athletes,” said U.S. Sen. Christopher R. Dodd, in joining University President Philip Austin to present the award. “Sen. Bayh’s leadership as original author of this legislation has directly impacted the millions of young women whose lives have been touched and bettered through equality in education, collegiate athletics, and opportunities for success in virtually every aspect of American life.”

Although UConn began admitting women in 1893, many publicly funded universities did not admit women, and many women who did enter universities were discouraged from studying math, science, law, or medicine, before Title IX became law in 1972, Dodd said. Perhaps the most profound change came in the area of athletics, however; and participation by women in virtually every sport has boomed since passage of the act.

“Title IX represented a major advance not just for women, but for all Americans and for higher education,” said University President Philip E. Austin. “I’m proud that UConn has a long and worthy tradition in making a university education accessible to women, and I’m especially proud of our efforts to encourage women to pursue their aspirations in fields in which they have been historically underrepresented.

“And of course, the success of our women’s sports programs and what that means for all the people of Connecticut speaks for itself,” Austin added.

Sen. Bayh also played a leadership role in many other areas and in framing two Constitutional amendments: the 26th Amendment, which lowered the legal voting age to 18, and the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed Constitutional amendment guaranteeing equal rights to women, which has been ratified by 35 states, including Connecticut.

Bayh, who also served in the Indiana House of Representatives, represented Indiana in the U.S. Senate from 1963 to 1981.

But for Evan Bayh, the apple has fallen far from the tree…he supports fatherhood (not parenthood)…this being sent out in preparation of the reintroduction of a Fatherhood Initiative Bill into the U.S. Senate:


Senator Bayh sent out this wonderful message for fathers on Father’s Day to the Hoosiers he represents. He missed sending out a message for mothers…tells you a lot, doesn’t it. He is up for re-election next year….Hoosiers mothers, are you paying attention?


Bayh

Watch out for these bill just introduced:

S. 1309, introduced by Sen. Evan Bayh, (D-IN) and two co-sponsors.

H.R. 2979, introduced by Rep. Danny K. Davis (IL-7) and 27 co-sponsors.

President Obama told Senator Bayh last year he would sign the bill when he gets it.

The 2006 attempt at this bill (with U.S. Senator Barack Obama as one of the two co-sponsors) died:

The list below shows legislation in this and previous sessions of Congress that had the same title as this bill. Often bills are incorporated into other omnibus bills, and you may be able to track the status of provisions of this bill by looking for an omnibus bill below. Note that bills may have multiple titles.

This one needs to die too.

bad-apple11


Is it fair for our government tax dollars to go help take children from mothers, to help fund a custody battle in court (among other ‘fatherly’ support things), help that is only available to fathers? These funds pay for dads to do this. All dads are not good (see Dastardly Dads