You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'protective parent' tag.
This is a repost from another BADASS blogger, Randi James…important information for anyone in California that has had to deal with a corrupt whore of the court, Janelle Burill. The intent of the blogging is to expose the corruption of family court everywhere. If we need to take down the corruption one official at a time so be it. Family court and it’s whores have underestimated the power of a woman….that was your first mistake among many that are coming…because payback IS a bitch…and a mother too.
Payback is a Bitch
I’d like to dedicate this to that special person that likes to Google their name and then get gag orders placed on bloggers:
The first step in exposing a corrupt MFT or LCSW is usually the filing of a complaint with BBS –
{ To : Enforcement Analyst Board of Behavioral Sciences 1625 North Market Blvd, Suite S200, Sacramento, CA 95834. Tel 916-574-7830 http://www.bbs.ca.gov Ref : Fraud & Misconduct by Janelle Burrill LCS 16216 }
A small percent of valid complaints are investigated by the Boards enforcement analysts and actions taken. Serious misconduct that justifies revocation of license and requires further criminal investigation is sent to the Division of Consumer Affairs, Division of Investigation – They are tasked to conduct a detailed investigation and their findings with details are given back to the BBS for action. BBS sends the findings with evidence to the Attorney General’s office for prosecution along with either interim or permanent suspension orders.
There are many complaints against Burrill. Her perjury, fraudulent practices are exposed with evidence that she or her lawyer husband cannot hide, suppress any more. It is with law enforcement and the people who are supposed to protect consumers have seen and heard it. The complaint against Burrill is being actively investigated by a small team of senior investigators at the Division of Investigators since April 2009. Its been six months and they have uncovered necessary and sufficient evidence and are in the process of sending in their findings. If you are a victim – You can supplement their case and send your complaint with any factual evidence of Burrills fraud directly to the investigators – address below
{To : Senior Investigator, Department of Consumer Affairs
Division of Investigation, 444 North 3rd Street, Suite 201, Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel : 916-324-1497
Ref : Fraud & Misconduct by Janelle Burrill LCS 16216}
Burrill is exposed and her corrupt ways will end soon (Another couple of months). We are optimistic that her ability to harm California families especially children will end. All her prior reports and recommendations to the courts will be thrown out. Prepare yourself – The AG’s report on Burrill is public content and you can call BBS or DCA and get a copy to go back to the courts on any bull shit, fraud she served the courts in her career.
If you are in Sacramento or Placer County then you can send a letter to the District Attorney for their help as-well.
Jan Scully, Sacramento DA, 901 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Bradford R Fenocchio, Placer County DA, 10810 Justice Center Drive, Suite #240, Roseville, CA 95678
Be optimistic, don’t give up – Lets get the facts in to the DCA investigators so we can see Burrill in handcuffs for Christmas
JUST SOME OF THE VICTIMS OF BURILL
FOLLOW ME I WILL HELP AND PROTECT YOU.....
Anyone dealing with or has dealt with family court corruption knows what terrors fill the heart of Mothers and especially those that were abused.
There are many ‘leaders’ out there that may say “follow me” and I will help you but yet they will ultimately be the ones profiting off of the pain of others by writing books, using your inner precious light for their own gains.
Do not allow these false profits to line their coffers for their own benefit and gains. With all of those out here that have a story to tell…tell it yourself!
Tell your story of how you were abused not only by the father of your children but by the whole system too.
The more people that expose this corruption and be your own media by blogging…because Oprah hasn’t called back….don’t count on any one organization or advocate to be your Savior, be your own Savior…no one else can do it for you. Just as NO one will advocate better for your child than their Mother. That is what females do, we grow babies in our bodies, we care for them, we protect them. Nobody loves your children more than you do.
Be the wind for change…..and NOT for profiting off others pain.
Let me count the ways…..
It has now come the stand off between my child and the county putting me in jail.
If my crime is protecting my child when she says she’s scared to go to her fathers because he drinks and so does grandma.
When my child told me that she is made to sleep on grandmas living room floor or if she does not like that, she may chose to sleep in the unfinished basement.
She tells me of both her father and grandmother taking her to the bar, drinking and then when they left the bar, grandma got into the wrong car. There was even a witness, several of them that watched as two drunks left a bar with a worried looking girl.
When the child that wet the bed constantly stopped since she refused to go back to him. The child that tells me she doesn’t believe they will put me in jail, that says she would go instead of me. If I have gotten this far and put in jail by the same county that did nothing to protect my daughter from her drunk driving sexual abusive father in 2006. You know who you are and I know what you are and if you think I have contempt for you, you are correct.
I have NOTHING BUT CONTEMPT, DISDAIN AND DISGUST FOR ALL OF YOU
Hon. Frank M. Calvert, Oconto County Family Court Commissioner
Hon. David G. Miron, Marinette County Circuit Court Judge
Attorney/GAL Aaron Krzewinski, Oconto County
Child Protection Worker, Carrie Silbernagel-Burke Oconto County
Hon. Francis Boyle, Marinette County Family Court Commissioner
Psychologist, Michael Mervilde, Green Bay WI
Counselor, Jennifer Werner, Green Bay WI
and my daughter also feels contempt when she grows up and she will thank you for making her who she will become…..your worst nightmare….a child out for revenge for jailing her mother and not protecting either of us when we needed it most. See the wheels of abuse do go round and round. Our bond will never be broken she and I are the same and you can try but you will never succeed.
I don’t understand it….why would my dog hate me? I’m his owner, I give him housing and shelter, he is only here because of me.
I own him, I can do whatever I want to him and he better not hate me for it, I own him.
Why does my dog hate me when I buy him treats but then it is so much fun to tease him by taking them away. Just withholding his milkbone a few extra seconds makes him appreciate me more, I am his owner, I own him.
Why does my dog hate me, he reminds me of his mother… that bitch, I use to kick her around too and then she ran off, I OWNED her. But I still have my little buddy here to keep tormenting….torturing her still…..this dog really hates me…why? Must be his mother that taught him to hate me…what other reason would a dog have to hate it’s owner? He’s my dog to kick…you can’t hate me for that, I own him.
What’s that? You want your Mommy? Sorry….I own you.
F**** YOU CPS
EVEN IF CPS HASN’T PROTECTED YOU DEAR DAUGHTER….THERE IS HOPE
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2130034
B.C. incest victim awarded $600,000 judgment
Keith Fraser, Canwest News Service
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
A 19-year-old Victoria woman who suffered horrific sex assaults at the hands of her father has been awarded nearly $600,000 in damages.
The girl, identified only as C.C.B. in a B.C. Supreme Court ruling, sued her father, identified only as I.B., over sex assaults that occurred while she was between the ages of about five and nine years old.
The crimes were reported to police in 1999 and after a 19-day criminal trial, I.B. was convicted and sentenced to six years in prison. He was released from prison in 2008, but for the civil lawsuit he chose not to appear or be represented by a lawyer.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Victoria Gray concluded that the victim suffers from an anxiety disorder, depression and intrusive thoughts about the abuse, lack of trust in others and low self-esteem and educational underachievement.
The judge said the plaintiff was entitled to a “significant” award of damages because of the severity of the abuse and the many aggravating factors.
“The defendant was the plaintiff’s natural father and sole custodial parent, and in a relationship of trust,” said the judge. “The plaintiff had little support from anyone else, because the defendant kept her from school and insisted that she spend time with him, and as a result the plaintiff was extremely vulnerable.”
The plaintiff was awarded $250,000 for pain and suffering, $300,000 for future earning capacity and $41,800 for cost of future care. Though the defendant did not appear at trial, his father recently passed away and the judge said the inheritance is available to be applied to the judgment.
Canwest News Service
FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTS ME
Freedom of speech, or the freedom of expression, is recognized in international and regional and human rights law.
Looking at my statcounter I’ve seen the nosy county worker searching and googling for their own name….pathetic if you ask me.
Nonetheless…continue reading my blog you might actually be educated on how CPS workers, Judges, Attorneys and other Whores of the Court place children at risk.
You originally called the mother and child a liar, it was proven they were not and then you did what you do best…NOTHING.
This is what has brought us all here and you should know that my blog is very popular within several organizations that are aware of your actions particularly…don’t tread on me.
Hope you enjoyed your time here 
….we’ll be watching
| Number of Entries: Entry Page Time: Visit Length: Browser OS Resolution |
56 22nd October 2009 12:08:13 2 hours 4 mins 40 secs IE 6.0 WinXP unknown |
 |
Returning Visits: Location: IP Address: Entry Page: Exit Page: Referring URL: |
0 Oconto, Wisconsin, United States Centurytel Internet Holdings (207.230.213.135) [Label IP Address] mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/the-grudge/ mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/the-grudge/ No referring link |
Who am I? I’m a Mother and I’m the most deadliest woman on the face of the earth
After years of abuse, threats, coercion and colluding with my abuser one woman is taking on a county (two actually) who have tried very hard to break her and her child. What they don’t know is that the Mother that they decided to use their underhanded tactics on isn’t from around these parts. She’s a warrior…and just like Beatrix Kiddo in Kill Bill…her enemies made her stronger.
So thank you Oconto County for giving me the strength, courage and tenacity to fight for my child and for what is right. Thank you Marinette County for helping me realize that you will never stop colluding with my abuser and for that I will never shut up, give up or go away. My child also has learned from your tactics and you will NEVER break the bonds between us…you have made us stronger….to face our abuser that you allow to stalk us in family court. The days of the corruption, collusion and cronyism is numbered for your ilk. Soon my daughter WILL be of age and I hope she sues ALL of your asses for failing to protect her when you had the chance….but for now….you should all remember that……
YOU NEVER GET BETWEEN A LIONESS AND HER CUB
14th century Japan was mostly a matriarchal society, where women ruled the household
The following is re-posted from “Dastardly Dads”, after reading this story it is amazing how Japanese society still respects mother and child bonds while the American society devalues it as much as possible. I hope the Japanese government stays strong and realizes what dirty little tricks that American courts and fathers play on mothers and children.
Japanese view: American dad kidnapping kids “not news”
I was interested to track down Japanese views on American dad CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE and his attempt to abduct his children from their mother and take them back to the U.S. And I just couldn’t find anything. I kept wondering why my searches of various Japanese newspapers–even in Fukuoka–kept coming up with zero.
Then I found this piece on CNN. Seems the Japanese don’t see this as “news,” so they’re not reporting it. Needless to say, the apparently Japanese reporter who interviewed various Americans found that they all declared–in a rather jingoistic humph–that Japan’s ways of doing things were “archaic and rigid” because they’re different from the way things are now done in U.S. The reporter also asserts that Japan treats DV and child abuse as strictly private affairs, and ignores them somehow because they believe in sole custody. Where the evidence for that is, I don’t know. And you don’t think that Americans try to sweep DV and child abuse under the rug too, especially in family court? Of course they do.
Frankly, I’m not seeing any of it. According to one of the very few articles on the attempted abduction to come out of Japan (Japan Times–posted here earlier today), one of the reasons that Japan doesn’t endorse the Hague Convention is because too many Japanese women are being abused by foreigner husbands, so there’s a need to protect them and their children post-divorce through sole custody. So the Japanese seem to be quite aware of domestic violence, at least no less so than the Americans, who are always trying to push battered women into joint custody with a violent ex-husband.
The comments to this CNN piece are interesting too. Of course, you have the usual self-righteous fathers rights types and disgrunted ex-husbands. But you also see a lot of Japanese anger over American attempts to meddle in their family policies. I’ve reproduced some of these mostly Japanese responses below the CNN piece. Oh, and check out the little digs regarding the U.S. criminal justice system, high violent crime rates, high divorce rates, and lack of universal health care. Juicy stuff!
An interesting question comes to mind here. If the FRs insist that selfish American women get divorces in high numbers because they get everything (in reality, they mostly get poverty and joint custody), then WHY is the divorce rate much lower in Japan? With the promise of sole custody, you’d figure every married Japanese woman would be clamoring for a divorce–if the FR assumption were correct. Quite the opposite. So it doesn’t appear that divorce rates necessarily have much to do with cultural assumptions about custody.
http://inthefield.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/30/family-mans-plight-not-news-in-japan/
Family man’s plight not news in Japan
Posted: 806 GMT
Then I found this piece on CNN. Seems the Japanese don’t see this as “news,” so they’re not reporting it. Needless to say, the apparently Japanese reporter who interviewed various Americans found that they all declared–in a rather jingoistic humph–that Japan’s ways of doing things were “archaic and rigid” because they’re different from the way things are now done in U.S. The reporter also asserts that Japan treats DV and child abuse as strictly private affairs, and ignores them somehow because they believe in sole custody. Where the evidence for that is, I don’t know. And you don’t think that Americans try to sweep DV and child abuse under the rug too, especially in family court? Of course they do.
Frankly, I’m not seeing any of it. According to one of the very few articles on the attempted abduction to come out of Japan (Japan Times–posted here earlier today), one of the reasons that Japan doesn’t endorse the Hague Convention is because too many Japanese women are being abused by foreigner husbands, so there’s a need to protect them and their children post-divorce through sole custody. So the Japanese seem to be quite aware of domestic violence, at least no less so than the Americans, who are always trying to push battered women into joint custody with a violent ex-husband.
The comments to this CNN piece are interesting too. Of course, you have the usual self-righteous fathers rights types and disgrunted ex-husbands. But you also see a lot of Japanese anger over American attempts to meddle in their family policies. I’ve reproduced some of these mostly Japanese responses below the CNN piece. Oh, and check out the little digs regarding the U.S. criminal justice system, high violent crime rates, high divorce rates, and lack of universal health care. Juicy stuff!
An interesting question comes to mind here. If the FRs insist that selfish American women get divorces in high numbers because they get everything (in reality, they mostly get poverty and joint custody), then WHY is the divorce rate much lower in Japan? With the promise of sole custody, you’d figure every married Japanese woman would be clamoring for a divorce–if the FR assumption were correct. Quite the opposite. So it doesn’t appear that divorce rates necessarily have much to do with cultural assumptions about custody.
http://inthefield.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/30/family-mans-plight-not-news-in-japan/
Family man’s plight not news in Japan
Posted: 806 GMT
Christopher Savoie’s case is playing out dramatically over the airwaves and in the blogosphere — an American man with sole legal custody of his young children, jailed in Japan for trying to bring his abducted children back to the U.S.
But if you’re Japanese, you’ve never heard of Savoie, because the story hasn’t been on a newscast or in the newspapers.
Based in Tokyo, among our first calls was to the local press in Fukuoka. The newspaper told us “This isn’t news.” When we asked if they would cover it because of the growing international interest, the paper flatly said, “No.”
That response is a window into the Japanese mindset of the privacy of the home, and helps explain the cultural and legal clash in which Savoie is trapped.
Invading into the domicile is considered taboo, where issues like domestic violence and child abuse still culturally remain private matters.
Japanese family law follows suit, hesitant to order families to recognize joint custody. It prefers to obey the cultural norm of the woman having primary custody, which often means the father never has any contact with the children. That would be unthinkable in a U.S. court, which sees joint custody as a matter of course in divorce.
The Americans I’ve interviewed in this story say they’re flabbergasted by Japan’s archaic and rigid laws. But in this culture, there’s no discussion about it. They don’t even consider it news.
Posted by: Kyung Lah
And a few of the reader responses:
How is it archaic just because it disagrees with American laws and values?
Why is it always that American values are considered fashionable, while East Asian values are considered a thing of the past? Americans need to wake up and start to realize that as they associate themselves more in this ever increasingly globalized world, that them and their values are not superior.
American opinion regarding children and divorce is very onesided. Yesterday the news was about the Japanese wife that kidnapped the kids. If she ever comes back to USA most likely she will be harassed and most likely jailed by the USA justice system ( police, prosecutors, judges, marshals, jail people) . This problem is temporary for until the kids become of age when they will anyway separate from their parents. USA thinks that it’s justice system is perfect and the rest of the world’s is flawed. Just let the kids be happy and with the next wife the man can be more caring. He can also visit them and make his presence known by sending gifts. All in all is not lost.
If this was about a European or any one else besides an American this wouldn`t be news Either. Epic Fail CNN. 85% of your news is about the united states. Sad really.
Well, the gentleman has apparently broken the law, and without knowing any details of his particular case it is impossible to justify his actions. As far as Japanese laws are concerned, the country enjoys 97% crime solvency rates, versus around 19% in the USA. Domestic abuse is a problem in every society, but there is hardly an indication of its predominance in Japan.
Did the father get the Japanese citizenship for a free medical care for his heart ailment? Or was it the mother’s idea to keep him and the kids under the Japanese law, in which case she is a smarter and more fit parent I must say.
CNN Japan site reveals some facts and the other side of the story which caught my attention. Mr. Savoie and the ex- wife is still legally married in Japan since they never filed for divorce in Japan. Japanese police discovered that Mr. Savoie has been Naturalized in Japan since 4years ago and therefore this case is dealt as married couple and the father trying to abduct children from their country.Both children hold Japanese passports.These facts were never discussed on American news.
also, on the talks about american v japans society and their laws, the crime rate here is almost nil in compairison to the US so abduction, even if the american laws said they were your children is a serious offense. also if this news were televised in japan or put in the news papers, it would be the american, mr savoie who is portraid as the criminal because he tried to take the children from the mother, who has sole custody, so if your asking for news coverage you would be asking for another bad light to be shinned on america
I am a Japanese. You are so right about one thing, “invading into the domicile is considered taboo” in Japan. I can’t even believe that picure of his kids and his ex-wife is exposed to the world and being controberted behind their back. I think Japan have many things to learn from other countries, but we have to respect different culture. As to this case, the problem is that they got divorced.Why dovorce rate is high in the States?I hope Japan and U.S. will work together to bring back quiet life to these kids
MOTHER
Child
