You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'FR' tag.
I don’t understand it….why would my dog hate me? I’m his owner, I give him housing and shelter, he is only here because of me.
I own him, I can do whatever I want to him and he better not hate me for it, I own him.
Why does my dog hate me when I buy him treats but then it is so much fun to tease him by taking them away. Just withholding his milkbone a few extra seconds makes him appreciate me more, I am his owner, I own him.
Why does my dog hate me, he reminds me of his mother… that bitch, I use to kick her around too and then she ran off, I OWNED her. But I still have my little buddy here to keep tormenting….torturing her still…..this dog really hates me…why? Must be his mother that taught him to hate me…what other reason would a dog have to hate it’s owner? He’s my dog to kick…you can’t hate me for that, I own him.
What’s that? You want your Mommy? Sorry….I own you.
“Hey! My name’s Tony and I wanted to to let you in on a how you can make your child a mess and get back at the kids mother, all you got to do is accuse them of PAS…that’s right Parental Alienation Syndrome, a.k.a. “brainwashing”.
Don’t worry that it was invented by a total loon and pro-pedophile, Dr. Richard Gardner, who wound up offing himself by stabbing himself…a lot.
Don’t even fuss about the fact that PAS is not even accepted by any mental health care provider worth their salt anyways….hehehe If you think you might be a victim of PAS or your kids were or are a victim of PAS, or wait a minute, you’re the victim, but then the kids are the victim too, no, okay, you’re the victim but the child is the TRUE victim…yeah…that’s the ticket….fool me twice, shame on you…ah, you get it.
Please take the below quiz to find out if one of yous guys is a victim.
Question 1 Are you an Asshole?
Question 2 Does or did more than one person have a restraining order against you?
Question 3 Do/did you hit your wife/girlfriend?
Question 4 Do/did you hit your wife/girlfriend?
If you answered yes to any of these questions…then congratulations!
You have PAS or your kid does…doesn’t matter….somebody has it and your lawyer, the judge, the guardian ad litem and other court whores are going to profit from it and your kids are seriously going to hate you for accusing their mother of it, but they already do anyways don’t they?
BTW….if you can’t spell “brainwashing” or use the word “brainsmashing” instead of using the correct word…you probably shouldn’t use it at all.
We lost our green land, we lost our clean air ,
We lost our true wisdom and we live in despair.
O sisters, o sisters, lets stand up right now,
Its never too late to start from the start.
O wisdom, o wisdom, thats what we ask for,
And, yes, my dear sisters, we must learn to ask.
Wisdom, o wisdom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
Wisdom, o wisdom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
O sisters, o sisters, lets wake up right now,
Its never too late to shout from our hearts.
O freedom, o freedom, thats what we fight for,
And, yes, my dear sisters, we must learn to fight.
Freedom, o freedom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
O freedom, o freedom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
O sisters, o sisters, lets give up no more,
Its never too late to build a new world .
O new world, o new world, thats what we live for,
And, yes, my dear sisters, we must learn to live.
New world, O new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
O new world , o new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
New world, o new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
O new world, o new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
lyrics by Yoko Ono
Angels, Duncan & Jack
A Mothers worst nightmare came true the day her ex-husband didn’t return their two sons, Duncan & Jack, back to their Mother Amy Leichtenberg.
In fact this mother had tried tirelessly to protect them, as we all do from abusive men. This case is not rare, in fact the increasing court ordered abuse is causing children to placed in danger by their father makes the news on a daily basis.
The justice system failed this family and now two little boys are taken forever from their Mother because the abuser knew that was the one thing that would hurt the Mother the most…this is their modus operandi, it’s the ultimate act of control, which is what an abuser does best.
Today Susan Murphy-Milano talks with Amy Leichtenberg about her tragedy from March. Don’t miss this important show can help others see the warning signs and how to protect yourself against your abuser and Family Court. Most importantly we need to learn how we can hold accountable the Judge and any other person(s) affiliated with the court ordered murder. A law should be in place so that other children will never part from their Mother, for ANY reason.
Show Time: 4:00 PM EST 3:00 PM CST 1:00 PM PST Call-in Number:
(347) 326-9337
If you have a question for Amy… and are unable to call in please email Susan Murphy-Milano at: contact@movingoutmovingon.com and it will be read on air Wednesday, September 9, 2009
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/susanmurphymilano
http://duncanandjackconnolly.com/
Duncan
Jack
CONFUSION
CONFUSION
NEXT THING YOU KNOW MEN WILL WANT YEARLY PAP SMEARS AND MAMMOGRAMS……….yeah right.
I try not to get into the habit of giving any of the father rights idiots anymore attention, but then I think about all the people that need to be educated on the blatant misogyny that Glenn Sacks and his minions bathe in.
In a recent post on Glenn Sacks rag “Mens Daily News” he confesses that,
“I posed as a male victim of domestic violence and called every domestic violence shelter in all of Los Angeles and San Diego counties.”
Isn’t it illegal to prank call?
According to Sacks,
“Not a single one would accept me or offer assistance, with the exception of Valley Oasis. Most flatly refused any assistance at all, but a couple did offer me space in a homeless shelter.” Apparently Sacks cares not for the women that may be stalked there and an ex may pretend he’s abused to gain entrance? All those calls must have put all residents and staff on high alert, how awful to be stressed more.
Mr. Sacks must be confused about a lot of things, mainly his gender. Sacks goes on to say when he asks them “Am I supposed to take my children to a homeless shelter?”
If you TRULY are a abused man allegedly with children and you are escaping an abuser a homeless shelter seems like the safest place to be.
But this is the typical trash from a man that makes you wonder how he treats other women in his life, wife, mother, sister or child?
The world according to these father rights activists is that feminism destroyed their lives.
They want you to believe that men are abused equally if not MORE than women but yet they do NOTHING to get their OWN shelters for the throngs of men who get their ass whipped by their women. Women and men saw a need and they built shelters for women with their children a safe haven from abusers.
The intention was clear, if your men group needs to have some place to go after they get raped by their wives after a night of boozing it up….build a male sexual abuse shelter!
If one of your brethren gets his face shoved into the carpet because he didn’t do ALL the dishes…by all means build that man a place to live.
IF he gets a baby bottle “tossed” at his face (while he’s holding a baby) then I say build a SHELTER! Instead of blaming shelters and everyone else for your problems do something about it!
END YOUR CONFUSION
CALLING ALL FATHER RIGHTS GROUP….WE’RE STILL KEEPING COUNT…..WHERE IS YOUR STATISTICS THAT WOMEN/MOTHERS KILL MORE THAN MEN/FATHERS? COME ON…..WE KNOW YOU CAN LIE SOME MORE…..JUST ASK MENS DAILY FUCKS
MURDERER
By Jim Staats
Marin Independent Journal
The 27-year-old son of the late pornography king Jim Mitchell was booked into Marin County Jail early Monday on suspicion of beating to death the Novato mother of his 1-year-old daughter.
James Raphael Mitchell, of Pittsburg, was detained late Sunday night in Citrus Heights, near Sacramento, after fleeing with the toddler, triggering a statewide Amber Alert.
James Mitchell is suspected of killing 29-year-old Danielle Keller, a Novato High School graduate who was living with her mother and the couple’s daughter, Samantha Mitchell, on Diablo Court in Novato. Police found Keller dead in the backyard when they responded to a call at 6:53 p.m. Sunday about a possible assault.
Mitchell was located using cell phone technology in Citrus Heights and arrested at 11:59 p.m. Sunday by local police. Samantha was recovered unharmed and was placed with child protective services in Sacramento, according to Novato police Capt. Jim Berg.
“They will most likely contact Marin County child protective services to coordinate the best location for the child,” Berg said.
Mitchell was booked in Marin County Jail at 6:50 a.m. Monday on suspicion of murder, child concealment, violation of court orders and domestic violence, according to police. He was due to be be arraigned in Marin Superior Court at 1:30 p.m. Tuesday. His attorney was reported to be former San Francisco district attorney Terence Hallinan.
Marin County Coroner Kenneth
Holmes said the cause of death was blunt force head trauma. Berg said police have a suspected weapon, though he declined further comment. There have been unconfirmed reports that a baseball bat was used.Keller’s mother, Claudia Stevens, spoke outside her home Monday morning as investigators searched for evidence on the property and yard behind her.
Stevens said she arrived home at about 5 p.m. Sunday after a Giants afternoon baseball game and was playing with Samantha, who was celebrating her first birthday. They had an ice cream cake ready for the young girl and Stevens went to visit some friends at 5:30 p.m. when she received a phone call from neighbors.
“They said I better get back over here right away,” said Stevens, a retired California Highway Patrol officer from Bakersfield. “I asked if Dani was OK and they told me she was dead and Samantha was missing.
“She was such a wonderful mother,” said Stevens of her daughter, who moved in with her six months ago after leaving the Pittsburg home she had shared with Mitchell.
Shaking with emotion as she spoke, Stevens said she saw Samantha on television Monday morning in the arms of a police officer.
“She seemed to be OK,” Stevens said. “She’s such a loving child.”
Stevens said her daughter, who worked in the cosmetics industry, had been interviewing for a new job and was trying to get her life back together after exiting an abusive relationship with Mitchell. She said the two had met two years ago at a club in San Francisco.
San Rafael attorney Charlotte Hideko Huggins represented Keller six months ago, helping her to gain a domestic violence restraining order against Mitchell.
Hideko Huggins said she had just mailed paperwork for a three-year restraining order Friday to Mitchell that he likely received Saturday.
Gina Stahl-Ricco of Novato was a fellow Novato High School graduate with Keller in 1998 who reconnected with “Dani” recently through Novato Mothers Club events.
“She moved back here six months ago to get away from this horrible person,” Stahl-Ricco said. “She always seemed bubbly and happy even though she was going through hard times. She was so committed to Sam. She was trying to get a support system here. She was trying to make a good life for Sam. She knew that’s what it was all about.”
Stahl-Ricco said although Mitchell had been abusive to her, Keller wavered in recent months about going back to him until she caught him doing drugs a month ago.
“She was sympathetic to his cause and would say ‘Oh, I hope he gets some help he’s had a tough past’ and I would tell her it doesn’t matter” and that she should stay away from him because he had allegedly hit her.
She said Keller was constantly having to ignore calls on her cell phone from Mitchell and had become increasingly scared of his recent messages.
“Sadly, it’s like you hear: You have a child together with somebody and you want it to work out and be ideal,” Stahl-Ricco said. “It didn’t seem like he wanted help.”
Hideko Huggins said Sunday was also the two-year anniversary of the death of porn king Jim Mitchell, the suspect’s father.
The elder Mitchell had developed a multimillion-dollar adult-film empire with his younger brother, Artie, and later was convicted of killing Artie in 1991 in Corte Madera. Jim Mitchell died on July 12, 2007 at his ranch near Petaluma at age 63 after serving three years of a six-year sentence for manslaughter in San Quentin State Prison.
Longtime Mitchell family friend Warren Hinckle, a veteran Bay Area author and journalist, said he saw Mitchell on July 5 at a party celebrating the 40th anniversary of the opening of the Mitchell brothers’ O’Farrell Theater. Hinckle said Mitchell had recently been doing well, having worked for a time at his family’s theater and serving in the Marines as a weekend reserve.
“He seemed in good shape to me, but a little tense,” he said. “I’m not sure how well domestic life suited him.”
A donation fund in the name of both Danielle Keller and Samantha Mitchell has been set up at Chase Bank, 1595 Grant Ave. in Novato.
Contact Jim Staats via e-mail at jstaats@marinij.com; IJ reporters Jim Welte and Brent Ainsworth contributed to this report.
DEAD BEAT DAD, DEAD BAT...ANY SIMILIARITY?
The militant “father’s rights” group F4J is at it again. Although this blog doesn’t like spreading their hateful propaganda it is too good to pass up a chance to show their insanity.
Geoff Hibbert, an activist with the group has put his “life and freedom on the line” as he enters day 21 of his hunger strike.
What do you say to that? This is how a MAN acts in everyday life because he dresses and thinks he’s a superhero. Mr. Hibbert a.k.a. “THE M25 Batman” has been convicted by a jury after police had to halt traffic for several hours on the M25 highway in August 2008 and faces a 7 YEAR sentence.
So….you become a public nuisance, justice is SERVED to you and then you starve yourself over a 7 year stint in prison? Well, at least this is one father that won’t be able to murder his children…..for 7 years…..or less.
This one is somewhat shocking to me…but not totally.
We reposted a post from a mom’s group in Indiana which was pretty shocking….an Indiana ”shared parenting” advocate by the name of Stuart Showalter blamed a mother (Angie Warnock) for her own death when her violent husband stabbed her to death on Father’s Day in front of their children. She had gotten a Protective Order against him three days prior because she feared him. Stuart claimed she was practicing “parental alienation” because she went to get the Protective Order, and blamed her for her own death because she enflamed the situation by getting it. Stuart’s view in his comment on the above post suggests any father, violent or not, deserves shared parenting. While I have no problem with sharing parenting, I do have a problem with abusive, violent parents of either gender sharing parenting of children.
“Shared Parenting” Advocate Stuart Showalter of IndianaStuart is “Executive Director” of the Indiana Custodial Rights Advocates and runs a “law blog.” This is also a front for “Boone County Fathers.” Stuart claims he has the ear of many politicians in the State of Indiana. I wonder if they really know who they are talking to and that he is accusing dead mothers of so-called “parental alienation.” If Indiana politicians are listening to this nutcase, God help them all.
As I always had thought and feared, many father’s rights organizations are run by violent men like this. They are accusatory…blaming mothers for any and everything. They are huge supporters of using the so-called “parental alienation” claim. Their very drivel is abusive. Unfortunately, good fathers hurting from a break in their relationship are lured into these groups, a goal of these nutcase leaders to make themselves look legitimate. One of the commenter’s on our repost noted he was probably a neonazi…and they were right! Yesterday, the mom’s group posted a story about it…and I thought it was just too good to let go…
Wanna see a little of Stuart’s history:
933 F.2d 573
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stuart W. SHOWALTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-1361.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided May 30, 1991.
Robert M. Barnes, Susan E. Heckard, Asst. U.S. Attys., Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff-appellee.
Daniel J. Coffey, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendant-appellant.
Before CUDAHY, RIPPLE, and MANION, Circuit Judges.
MANION, Circuit Judge.
1 Stuart Showalter pleaded guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861(d). He appeals the length and conditions of his supervised release. We remand for resentencing because the length of supervised release exceeds the amount authorized by statute, but affirm the conditions of Showalter’s supervised release imposed by the district court.I.
2 Showalter headed an Indianapolis organization called the “Pure American Freedom Party,” which was loosely associated with other white supremacist “skinhead” and “neo-Nazi” groups in Indiana and around the United States. Showalter, then 20 years old, was prominently featured in a July 1989 article in the Indianapolis Monthly magazine called “Skinhead Society: Should a Local Group of Neo-Nazis be Feared, Tolerated or Ignored?” The article described the weaponry in Showalter’s apartment, and discussed the group’s potential for committing acts of violence. This publicity apparently brought him to the attention of his landlords, who sought to evict him from his apartment (in a predominantly black neighborhood) for late payment of rent and violation of the lease by having too many occupants. Showalter failed to leave on time, and was seen outside the apartment brandishing a weapon, so the police were called in to assist in his departure. When he failed to respond to their request to drop his gun and come out, the police broke in and arrested him and another occupant.
II.
3 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Showalter pleaded guilty to possession of an unregistered firearm–a “Remington Wingmaster .12 gauge sawed-off shotgun with an obliterated serial number”–in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861(d). He was sentenced within the guidelines to 14 months imprisonment, followed by five years supervised release. The terms of supervised release included the condition that Showalter “shall not participate in, or associate with those who do participate in, the organization known as ’skinheads,’ or in any neo-Nazi organization.” Showalter appealed both the length and conditions of his supervised release.
III.
4 The government concedes the district court erred in imposing a five-year period of supervised release. Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(b)(2) provides that the maximum length of supervised release for a “Class C” felony–where the maximum term of imprisonment is between 10 and 25 years, pursuant to Sec. 3559(a)(3)–is three years. The maximum term for violating 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861(d) is 10 years. See 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5871. Thus, under guidelines Sec. 5D3.2(b)(2) (renumbered November 1, 1989 to Sec. 5D1.2(b)(2)), Showalter must receive a term of supervised release of “at least two years but not more than three years.” We remand to the district court for the purpose of adjusting the length of supervised release.
5 Showalter does not challenge the condition of supervised release that he not participate in white supremacist organizations, but does raise three related objections to the requirement that he avoid associating with other skinheads and neo-Nazis. We review the district court’s imposition of conditions of supervised release under the deferential “abuse of discretion” standard. United States v. Alexander, 743 F.2d 472, 479-80 (7th Cir.1984) (citations omitted).
6 He first contends that the condition lacks the “certainty” required by the new Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 “because skinheads and neo-nazis are not readily identifiable groups.” No case law is cited to support the contention that the Sentencing Reform Act was intended to limit the broad discretion given district courts to determine conditions of supervised release (formerly conditions of probation). See Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 220, 53 S.Ct. 154, 155, 77 L.Ed. 266 (1932); United States v. Williams, 787 F.2d 1182, 1185 (7th Cir.1986).
7 The district court placed similar conditions on Showalter during the time between the guilty plea and sentencing, and Showalter had no difficulty understanding them then. At the sentencing hearing, the district court reprimanded Showalter for writing a letter espousing his white supremacist views to a newspaper in Washington state.1 Showalter responded:As regards to this happening after my plea agreement, I was under the understanding I was not to hang out with the skinheads out on the street up in Broad Ripple, so forth, have them over at my house, things like that. I wasn’t aware that it covered giving my opinion to a newspaper.
8 We hold that the condition is sufficiently clear to put Showalter on notice regarding the parameters of the court’s restriction on his associational activities.
9 Next Showalter argues that the condition of probation is not specific enough to comply with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3563(b)(7), which allows the district court to order the defendant to “refrain from frequenting specified kinds of places or from associating unnecessarily with specified persons; …”. Pressed at oral argument, Showalter’s counsel did not say that these “specified persons” must be listed by name, but he did contend they must be specified to some greater, but unexplained, degree.
10 We first point out that the district court is empowered, under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(d), to impose “any other condition it considers to be appropriate.” That would seem to provide an independent authority for the district court’s decision here. Even so, we think the condition imposed by the district court is authorized by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3563(b)(7).
11 In Malone v. United States, 502 F.2d 554, 555 (9th Cir.1974), the Ninth Circuit upheld similar conditions of probation on a defendant who was convicted of unlawful exportation of firearms from the United States to the United Kingdom. These conditions prevented him from participating in any American Irish Republican movement, from belonging to any Irish organization, from participating in any Irish Catholic organization, from visiting any Irish pubs, and from accepting employment that would directly or indirectly associate him with any Irish organization. The court found that the conditions of probation … are not too vague and are reasonably related to the goals of probation and the accomplishment of public order and safety and … do not constitute an abuse of the Court’s discretion in the circumstances.
13Id., 502 F.2d at 557.
14 We cited Malone with approval in Alexander, 743 F.2d at 480-81, where we noted that district courts frequently were allowed to prevent defendants from being involved in different types of “gainful activity” as a condition of probation. While the restriction on Showalter’s associational activity is significant, it is no more significant than that approved in Malone, and it is justified by the court’s concern that Showalter not involve himself with those who might fuel his proclivity for lawbreaking.
15 Finally, Showalter suggests that this condition does not comport with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(d)(2)’s requirement that it involve “no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to deter future criminal conduct and protect the public from further crimes. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3553(a)(2)(B), (C) and (D). However, the district court’s explanation of the condition adequately supports depriving Showalter of the liberty to associate with skinheads and neo-Nazis:
16 Because those groups embrace violence and the threat of violence as a method of advancing their views, I find that your association with them would create a high likelihood that you would be drawn into that same behavior, and that’s the reason for the restriction.
The court also reminded Showalter that (17) supervised release is intended to be a period of time when you’re under close supervision by the court to make sure that after you get out of prison you can abide by the terms and conditions that hopefully will keep you within a lawful groove and keep you from slipping back into your criminal behavior.
18 After reviewing the entire record, including the magazine article about Showalter and his organization, we conclude the district court was correct that Showalter needs to be separated from other members of white supremacist groups to have a chance of staying out of trouble. This condition of supervised release therefore meets the statutory requirements of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(d)(2).
19 The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering special conditions of supervised release, and that portion of the sentence is affirmed. We remand to the district court to resentence on the length of supervised release in a manner consistent with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(b)(2), and guidelines Sec. 5D3.2(b)(2), now Sec. 5D1.2(b)(2).
20AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
1 Although the district court seemed to think the conditions placed on Showalter prior to sentencing should have at least discouraged him from writing controversial letters to newspapers, there is nothing to that effect in the conditions imposed at sentencing. This incident illustrates the importance of specificity in formulating conditions of supervised release.
Geez….I hope some people start waking up to the fact that dangerous individuals run groups like these…
http://www.madhunt.com/paulette-macdonal-20090629.html
Bradford fire wants Alliston’s ‘Bat Girl’ to pay for broken truck
Posted June 29, 2009
An Alliston woman charged with mischief for climbing the Cookstown Outlet Mall’s water tower in April is facing about $50,000 in potential restitution costs, including a $36,921 bill by the Bradford fire department because the truck that responded to the call, broke down on the way back to the station.
Paulette MacDonald, dressed as Bat Girl, climbed the tower to draw attention to Parental Alienation Awareness Day, made a second court appearance last week, and learned from the Crown’s disclosure the total cost being sought by South Simcoe Police, Innisfil Fire, and Bradford Fire, is $48,944.
Ms. MacDonald had scaled the tower before sunrise, unfurled a banner supporting her cause, then spent several hours unnoticed before “I finally yelled down to a group of young ladies coming out of the mall and requested that she notify the mall security for me.”
Police were called, as were firefighters, first from Innisfil, but then Bradford for its aerial truck.
“When the fireman asked me to come down the ladder of the firetruck, I didn’t want to,” said Ms. MacDonald in a press release from the group Fathers 4 Justice (F4J). “I felt much safer getting back down the way I came up.”
The F4J has also weighed into the situation, suggesting that Bradford should thank “Bat Girl.”
“In my eyes, Ms. MacDonald should receive thanks for highlighting flaws in the fire department’s equipment before it was actually needed in an emergency,” said Kris Titus, F4J National Coordinator. “This might have more to do with the competence of their maintenance system than our featherweight superhero. We’re obviously glad that she was safe during the rescue, considering the circumstances.”
Ms. MacDonald is due back in Bradford court July 23.
