You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'fathers' tag.
I don’t understand it….why would my dog hate me? I’m his owner, I give him housing and shelter, he is only here because of me.
I own him, I can do whatever I want to him and he better not hate me for it, I own him.
Why does my dog hate me when I buy him treats but then it is so much fun to tease him by taking them away. Just withholding his milkbone a few extra seconds makes him appreciate me more, I am his owner, I own him.
Why does my dog hate me, he reminds me of his mother… that bitch, I use to kick her around too and then she ran off, I OWNED her. But I still have my little buddy here to keep tormenting….torturing her still…..this dog really hates me…why? Must be his mother that taught him to hate me…what other reason would a dog have to hate it’s owner? He’s my dog to kick…you can’t hate me for that, I own him.
What’s that? You want your Mommy? Sorry….I own you.
What the “Father Rights” Joke about? Below is a joke found on FR group…..how appropos….since they’re always complaining about how much child support they have to pay.
Tired of constantly being broke & stuck in an unhappy marriage, a young husband decided to solve both problems by taking out a large insurance policy on his wife with himself as the beneficiary, and then arranging to have her killed.
A ‘friend of a friend’ put him in touch with a nefarious dark-side underworld figure who went by the name of ‘Artie.’ Artie then explained to the husband that his going price for snuffing out a spouse was $5,000. The husband said he was willing to pay that amount, but that he wouldn’t have any cash on hand until he could collect his wife’s insurance money.
Artie insisted on being paid at least something up front, so the man opened his wallet, displaying the single dollar bill that rested inside. Artie sighed, rolled his eyes, & reluctantly agreed to accept the dollar as down payment for the dirty deed.
A few days later, Artie followed the man’s wife to the local Super Wal-Mart store. There, he surprised her in the produce department & proceeded to strangle her with his gloved hands. As the poor unsuspecting woman drew her last breath & slumped to
the floor ……. The manager of the produce department stumbled unexpectedly onto the murder scene Unwilling to leave any living witnesses behind, ol’ Artie had no choice but to strangle the produce manager as well.
However, unknown to Artie, the entire proceedings were captured by the hidden security cameras & observed by the store’s security guard, who immediately called the police. Artie was caught and arrested before he could even leave the store.
Under intense questioning at the police station, Artie revealed the whole sordid plan, including his unusual financial arrangements with the hapless husband who was also quickly arrested.
The next day in the newspaper, the headline declared…
*’ARTIE CHOKES 2 for $1.00 @ WAL-MART!’*
Why doesn’t Family Court get “it” that there is no such thing as joint/shared parenting when mothers have to deal with this type of a man?
Then this today…
Northfield man gets 15 years for killing mother of his five children
MAYS LANDING – Friday used to be the day Louis Ceresa took his five children out for pizza.
But this Friday, instead of picking them up, the Northfield man was sentenced to 15 years in prison for killing their mother.
Ceresa admitted in July that he strangled Amanda Carmen, 34, while the two sat in her minivan outside his Revere Avenue home during a scheduled custody exchange Jan. 11.
Superior Court Judge Bernard DeLury called the plea agreement’s recommended 15-year sentence “lenient,” but said that Ceresa’s willingness to admit his guilt spared his children from a painful trial and his eldest from having to testify in court.
The couple’s 11-year-old son witnessed the killing.
“I can’t tell you what I did that night or why I did it,” Ceresa, 33, told the judge Friday. “I don’t know what happened.”
When he pleaded to aggravated manslaughter in July, Ceresa said “I exploded” after Carmen told him she was moving away with their children.
“I didn’t mean for this to happen,” he said at the time.
“To lose a child, at any age, from illness or accident is horrific,” Carmen’s mother, Margaret, said in a statement read in court by victim counselor Trisha Hayek. “But to lose her because someone was angry and just ‘didn’t mean to kill her’ is unbearable.”
Now, Carmen’s children will not have their mother with them for all the important things in life, she said: “What Louis did will have an effect on our family not just now, but also for generations to come.”
“I have no excuse for what I did,” Ceresa said.
He apologized to his children – who were not in court – as well as the dozen family members there to support him. He also apologized to the Carmens, explaining, “they were my family for many years.”
And once again, as he had when he pleaded, Ceresa professed his love for Carmen.
“Louis claims he loved Amanda,” Margaret Carmen wrote. “How do you put your hands around the throat of someone you love and watch them take their last breath of life? How is his defense, ‘I didn’t mean to’?”
But defense attorney Anthony Previti said the killing was an anomaly, and Ceresa is a good man who has shown consistent remorse since the killing.
Previti said Ceresa asked that nothing positive be said about him in court, “but I am compelled to say it.”
“I don’t feel like a good person,” Ceresa said. “I do feel rotten. I do feel like crap, and I should. I’ll make sure I come down on myself for the rest of my life.”
For at least the next 12 years, that life will be in prison. He must serve 85 percent of the imposed sentence before he is eligible for parole.
By that time, the victim’s mother said, the children “will have the time to grow up and understand the situation and how they feel about it.”
She said she would like to see Ceresa spend the rest of his life in jail, but the family accepted the plea deal to spare her 11-year-old grandson “the agony of having seen his mother strangled to death by his father and then have to testify and put his father in prison.”
It is more time than the nine years Millville police Sgt. Robert Vanaman received after admitting during jury selection for his murder trial in March that he killed his wife and tried to cover up the crime in 2006.
In August, DeLury sentenced Rosina McKinnie to nine years in prison under a plea agreement in which she admitted to fatally stabbing her live-in boyfriend Aramis Smith during a 2008 party at the couple’s Pleasantville home. There was a history of domestic violence against McKinnie in that case.
Previti told DeLury on Friday how the judge often said domestic violence cases are one step away from homicide. But in this case, “there was no warning,” Previti said.
Police had not broken up fights between the two. Ceresa had no criminal background.
“I don’t believe he’s even had a parking ticket,” Previti said.
But there was daily alcohol consumption and a history of cocaine use, DeLury pointed out.
“This defendant was not entirely a law-abiding person, as evidence by his frequent (drug) abuse.”
Ceresa relinquished his parental rights. The children, ages 5 to 11, now live with their maternal grandmother in Egg Harbor Township.
“I lost my children. I lost Amanda. I lost everything over something stupid,” Ceresa told the judge. “When I die, I’ll pay for this again. I’ll be judged again.”
We lost our green land, we lost our clean air ,
We lost our true wisdom and we live in despair.
O sisters, o sisters, lets stand up right now,
Its never too late to start from the start.
O wisdom, o wisdom, thats what we ask for,
And, yes, my dear sisters, we must learn to ask.
Wisdom, o wisdom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
Wisdom, o wisdom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
O sisters, o sisters, lets wake up right now,
Its never too late to shout from our hearts.
O freedom, o freedom, thats what we fight for,
And, yes, my dear sisters, we must learn to fight.
Freedom, o freedom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
O freedom, o freedom, thats what we ask for,
Thats what we live for no-oo-ow.
O sisters, o sisters, lets give up no more,
Its never too late to build a new world .
O new world, o new world, thats what we live for,
And, yes, my dear sisters, we must learn to live.
New world, O new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
O new world , o new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
New world, o new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
O new world, o new world, thats what we live for,
Thats what we must now learn to build.
lyrics by Yoko Ono
Angels, Duncan & Jack
A Mothers worst nightmare came true the day her ex-husband didn’t return their two sons, Duncan & Jack, back to their Mother Amy Leichtenberg.
In fact this mother had tried tirelessly to protect them, as we all do from abusive men. This case is not rare, in fact the increasing court ordered abuse is causing children to placed in danger by their father makes the news on a daily basis.
The justice system failed this family and now two little boys are taken forever from their Mother because the abuser knew that was the one thing that would hurt the Mother the most…this is their modus operandi, it’s the ultimate act of control, which is what an abuser does best.
Today Susan Murphy-Milano talks with Amy Leichtenberg about her tragedy from March. Don’t miss this important show can help others see the warning signs and how to protect yourself against your abuser and Family Court. Most importantly we need to learn how we can hold accountable the Judge and any other person(s) affiliated with the court ordered murder. A law should be in place so that other children will never part from their Mother, for ANY reason.
Show Time: 4:00 PM EST 3:00 PM CST 1:00 PM PST Call-in Number:
(347) 326-9337
If you have a question for Amy… and are unable to call in please email Susan Murphy-Milano at: contact@movingoutmovingon.com and it will be read on air Wednesday, September 9, 2009
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/susanmurphymilano
http://duncanandjackconnolly.com/
Duncan
Jack
Posted previously by RightsForMothers.com
Another custodial father allegedly killed by child because of ongoing abuse…again. As the rant by father’s groups and “shared parenting” groups continue, and abusive fathers get custody more and more, we will see these incidents increase. This is, because in the eyes of some of these groups, an abusive father is better than no father at all. I bet this little boy thought differently.
Why in the world would an abusive father have custody of children? Because, when they try for custody, they get it 70% of the time. Research has shown that these fathers who abused the mother will start abusing the children 40-60% of the time, if they hadn’t been already.
The Children, Youth and Families Department had SEVEN reports of abuse in the household, and did NOTHING.
And AGAIN…neighbors are quoted as saying what a nice guy this was…geezzzz. Who could ever believe a father would abuse a child…not many men’s rights advocates I know which I won’t name.
Someone needs to take charge here and stop abusive parents from getting custody of children and to have abuse allegations taken seriously. Child protective service’s agencies are a JOKE, and will excuse any reports of abuse if it is in the context of custody disputes. For more on this, see:
I’m as Mad as Hell, and I’m Not Going to Take This Anymore
How many more children will be put in this position of “him or me” in determining survival? How many children will not be able to take one more beating, or one more rape, and then break?
From the Digital Journal:
Boy, 10, could face murder charges in death of his father
Published 3 hours ago by ■ Chris Dade
A 10-year-old boy from Belen, New Mexico is facing a possible charge of first-degree murder after his 42-year-old father died from a wound to the head, allegedly inflicted by his son.
According to ABC News, which in turn quotes a report by KOAT-TV, a boy allegedly used his own gun to shoot his father. Police were then called to the home of Byron Hilburn last Thursday evening, where they found him dead with a head wound.
Police believe the boy’s 6-year-old sister witnessed the shooting.
Hilburn was eventually pronounced dead at the University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque.
The motive for the killing is apparently that the dead man, divorced and with custody of his three children, disciplined his son too harshly and too frequently, according to the boy. As the London Times reports, the man’s third child, a 9-year-old boy, was on a visit to other members of his family when the shooting occurred.
Police have reportedly not ruled out the possibility the shooting was an accident; the London Times says that the boy, who will be appointed a legal guardian prior to any police interviews, cannot be charged with murder without the approval of the New Mexico juvenile probation department.
The boy’s younger sister is now being cared for by family members, as their mother’s whereabouts and her involvement in their lives’ has not been made clear. The 10-year-old himself is in the custody of the New Mexico’s Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD). And the CYFD has confirmed that since 2003 it has received seven anonymous calls alleging child abuse and neglect within the victim’s household. But its inquiries into the welfare of the children have not produced sufficient evidence to warrant removing the three children from the household.
Neighbors of the family reported nothing untoward in their experience of them, with descriptions such as “a good family” and “the kind of family you’d like to live next to” being used.
If the boy is eventually charged with his father’s murder, there are expected to be protests from human rights groups, among them Amnesty International. The London-based organization has been critical in the past of the record of the U.S. with regard to the human rights of children. (YES, YES, YES)
Personally, I just signed up my child for gun safety and shooting…
WATCH OUT DADDY
I learned from the best on how to abuse and now my aim is getting better!
British scientists grow sperm in laboratory
GUESS SOMEONE JUST GOT DOWNSIZED
Women who say they don’t need a man may well be right – after human sperm was created in the lab.
I already know what is going to be said, I hate men and that is a lie, because there is one in particular I love very much. He is the man that I wished I could of made a father because he is the one that very much deserved to be one.
Still….I can’t help but wonder what it would be like if you took out the factor of the one thing allegedly women only want men for and the one thing that they are good at (impregnating their sperm). This could be an end of child support! This could be the start of something beautiful…..
CONFUSION
CONFUSION
NEXT THING YOU KNOW MEN WILL WANT YEARLY PAP SMEARS AND MAMMOGRAMS……….yeah right.
I try not to get into the habit of giving any of the father rights idiots anymore attention, but then I think about all the people that need to be educated on the blatant misogyny that Glenn Sacks and his minions bathe in.
In a recent post on Glenn Sacks rag “Mens Daily News” he confesses that,
“I posed as a male victim of domestic violence and called every domestic violence shelter in all of Los Angeles and San Diego counties.”
Isn’t it illegal to prank call?
According to Sacks,
“Not a single one would accept me or offer assistance, with the exception of Valley Oasis. Most flatly refused any assistance at all, but a couple did offer me space in a homeless shelter.” Apparently Sacks cares not for the women that may be stalked there and an ex may pretend he’s abused to gain entrance? All those calls must have put all residents and staff on high alert, how awful to be stressed more.
Mr. Sacks must be confused about a lot of things, mainly his gender. Sacks goes on to say when he asks them “Am I supposed to take my children to a homeless shelter?”
If you TRULY are a abused man allegedly with children and you are escaping an abuser a homeless shelter seems like the safest place to be.
But this is the typical trash from a man that makes you wonder how he treats other women in his life, wife, mother, sister or child?
The world according to these father rights activists is that feminism destroyed their lives.
They want you to believe that men are abused equally if not MORE than women but yet they do NOTHING to get their OWN shelters for the throngs of men who get their ass whipped by their women. Women and men saw a need and they built shelters for women with their children a safe haven from abusers.
The intention was clear, if your men group needs to have some place to go after they get raped by their wives after a night of boozing it up….build a male sexual abuse shelter!
If one of your brethren gets his face shoved into the carpet because he didn’t do ALL the dishes…by all means build that man a place to live.
IF he gets a baby bottle “tossed” at his face (while he’s holding a baby) then I say build a SHELTER! Instead of blaming shelters and everyone else for your problems do something about it!
END YOUR CONFUSION
DEAD BEAT DAD, DEAD BAT...ANY SIMILIARITY?
The militant “father’s rights” group F4J is at it again. Although this blog doesn’t like spreading their hateful propaganda it is too good to pass up a chance to show their insanity.
Geoff Hibbert, an activist with the group has put his “life and freedom on the line” as he enters day 21 of his hunger strike.
What do you say to that? This is how a MAN acts in everyday life because he dresses and thinks he’s a superhero. Mr. Hibbert a.k.a. “THE M25 Batman” has been convicted by a jury after police had to halt traffic for several hours on the M25 highway in August 2008 and faces a 7 YEAR sentence.
So….you become a public nuisance, justice is SERVED to you and then you starve yourself over a 7 year stint in prison? Well, at least this is one father that won’t be able to murder his children…..for 7 years…..or less.
Father and Murderer Leslie Schuler Didn’t Want to be a “Visitor” to His Child Anymore
Seven year-old Nathaniel Turner will be taken off of life support following a brutal father’s day beating by none other than his father. According to what I have gathered from the media, this case has many twists and turns–almost every one of them a relevant issue that I continuously write about…It is all very confusing but I’ll try to sort it out.
Father Leslie Schuler was an absent father who paid child support when he felt like it.
There was a paternity test–don’t know if the father initiated, or perhaps the mother was on government assistance and thus the Child Support Office would have surely gone after their money the money due to the child. After paternity was established, a child support order was issued.
At some time, the mother, Alicia Taylor, asked for child support to be increased whilst simultaneously, father Leslie Schuler asked for visitation. No mention if perhaps the Child Support Office or the local fatherhood groups/program put this nonsense (asking for visitation) into the father’s head (see The Purpose of Child Support Enforcement). And God knows how both the fatherhood groups and the Child Support Office target Black men. Oh, whoops, my bad, the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) and the fatherhood groups ARE THE SAME THING!!! (see The Office of Child Support Enforcement Wants to Promoted Both Agreed Upon Child Support Orders and Visitation Orders)
The judge denied the child support increase request and also the visitation request because a Department of Revenue (DOR= Child Support) lawyer told the judge that the mother didn’t have custody of the child. I have heard this same scenario repeated many times in my circles. Remember that when DOR comes into your case, you, the custodial parent, are no longer a party to what was originally your own case.
But the father didn’t have the child at that time either. It seems that the Nathaniel had been with his grandmother in Alabama because the mother had “mental problems.” Could her mental problems have been related to…um…maybe not having enough money to support her son…or…um. ..maybe.. .her history [of abuse] with the father of her child? I don’t know. Just speculating.
However, the father does have a “lengthy criminal record.”
But what does this mean?
According to the fresh U.S. Department of Justice Special Report: Practical Implications of Current Domestic Violence Research for Law Enforcement, Judges, and Prosecutors:
Most studies agree that the majority of domestic violence perpetrators that come to the attention of criminal justice or court authorities have a prior criminal history for a variety of nonviolent and violent offenses against males as well as females, and of a domestic or nondomestic nature.
…Similarly, 84.4 percent of men arrested for domestic violence in Massachusetts had
prior criminal records, averaging a little more than 13 prior charges (resulting from five to six arrests) — including four for property offenses, three for offenses against persons, three for major motor vehicle offenses, two for alcohol/drug offenses, one for public order violations, and 0.14 for sex offenses.
More eye opening, in light of the fact that many men are not charged or convicted (money and power)…you know, since “false allegations” are so prevalent:
Even if abusers have no prior arrest records, they may be known to local police..
Studies of abusers brought to court for protective orders find similarly high rates of criminal histories, ranging from slightly more than 70 percent in Texas to 80 percent in Massachusetts.
Anyway, moving forward, since most of the corruption is occurring with the law enforcement, judges, and prosecutors who don’t give a damn about the report…
Of course DCF is covering its ass saying that they investigate people before they give them custody. When the hell did they start doing that? And obviously, absent father Leslie Schuler wasn’t a part of this investigation.
And CPS won’t comment on whether they were previously involved with the family. Well, of course they won’t comment if there could be any possibility of negligence on their behalf. CPS, like DCF and DOR/CSE are all government entities.
Somehow, the grandmother is lead to believe that the father has court-ordered summer visitation with Nathaniel. She never sees an order, but want to be sure she is in compliance with the law. Grandmas don’t want to be caught up in no shit (ask Eddy Curry’s child’s grandmother). BUT, somehow, no one from the court can find any order granting custody or visitation to the father. WTF?
And so, the father gets his wish to “meet the child and build a relationship,” and while he is doing so, proceeds to emotionally and physically abuse his son Nathaniel who has ADD (which, by the way is an oh-so common condition that manifests itself during and after abuse). This ends in the father’s day demise of the young boy.
Father Leslie Schuler is originally charged with assault and battery. Additionally, his girlfriend, Tiffany Hyman, is charged with the same for failing-to-protect. There goes that infamous woman-only charge again. Failure-to-protect.
Now I have read the comments on the article and they really paint girlfriend Tiffany out to be a monster accomplice. I MAJORLY disagree, based on the little bit on info that we have so far.
Tiffany is 28 years old. Is she a mother also? Does it matter? Was she responsible for this child? If so, who made her responsible? And is she legally responsible?
I know no one wants to hear the “maybe she was a victim of abuse, too” argument, because society is woman-blaming. ..but I have to present this to you:
- Are we, as a society, saying that it is some random person’s responsibility to protect other people?
- Is it some random person’s responsibility to protect someone just because that person is a child? Or disabled? Or what?
- In which scenarios must we intervene? And who gets to decide if we properly intervened, or not?
- What about the risk to ourselves?
- Are we saying that every person is required by law to take on the hero/heroine/ shero role given some specific or non-specific situation?
This is major!!!
Unless Tiffany participated in the beating, I think it is insane to hold her accountable. We could have had two dead human beings.
Why don’t we hold Child Support, DCF and the legal system responsible?
And then, to top it off, bringing the child off of life support is now a public forum with the decision subject to a judge’s approval. Is this necessary? Can’t families make decisions for their own loved ones. The government fucked this whole thing up and now it wants end-of-life decision-making powers?
Fatherhood. Fatherless. Visitation. Child custody. Child Support. DCF. CPS. Judges. Children. Access/Visitation. Your tax dollars
Who’s paying attention?
